A key part of this is the new helper, get_user_by_delivery_email. Its
verbose name is important for clarity; it should help avoid blind
copy-pasting of get_user (which we'll also want to rename).
Unfortunately, it requires detailed understanding of the context to
figure out which one to use; each is used in about half of call sites.
Another important note is that this PR doesn't migrate get_user calls
in the tests except where not doing so would cause the tests to fail.
This probably deserves a follow-up refactor to avoid bugs here.
If a user deletes message between when it triggered a potential push
notification for another user, and when that notification was actually
sent, we'd end up with a situation where the `Message` table didn't
have an entry for the requested message ID.
The clean fix for this is to still throw an exception in the event
that the message doesn't exist at all, but if it exists in
ArchivedMessage, don't throw a user-facing exception.
This adds a function that sends provided email to all administrators
of a realm, but in a single email. As a result, send_email now takes
arguments to_user_ids and to_emails instead of to_user_id and
to_email.
We adjust other APIs to match, but note that send_future_email does
not yet support the multiple recipients model for good reasons.
Tweaked by tabbott to modify `manage.py deliver_email` to handle
backwards-compatibily for any ScheduledEmail objects already in the
database.
Fixes#10896.
This provides a nice user experience for folks where we do know what
their LDAP credentials are.
Though we need to fix#10917 before the content in the email with be
correct.
The various vars here that had recipient_subject
in the name now have either bucket or bucket_tup
there.
The shorter names are a bit easier to read, and the
original names were misleading for the PM case.
This was basically two search/replaces, and we have
good test coverage here, so it's pretty low risk
despite the messy diff.
Extracting this helper library will help us avoid an import loop
between notifications.py and message.py (with bugdown in between).
But in addition to that, it's a more natural model, since some of the
uses for these functions weren't part of the notifications code
anyway.
This modifies the logic for formatting outgoing missed-message emails
to support the upcoming stream email notifications feature (providing
a new format for the subject, etc.).
Because we're passing through the trigger for notifications to
do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip, we don't need to go back
to the database to determine which messages actually mentioned the
user.
This change converts our logic for determining whether the current
user was mentioned in a group of messages from the implicit "if it was
sent to a stream, it's a mention" to the explicit "we actually know
there was a mention in the message". This is an important
prerequisite for our upcoming feature to support getting email
notifications for streams always (even without a mention).
Because in upcoming commits, we'll want to pass additional per-message
data into do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip, we need to
expand the format for how we represent messages to account for that.
The only changes visible at the AST level, checked using
https://github.com/asottile/astpretty, are
zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py:
'\x1b\\[(1|0)m' ↦ '\\x1b\\[(1|0)m'
'\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\n' ↦ '\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\\n'
which is fine because re treats '\\x1b' and '\\n' the same way as
'\x1b' and '\n'.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
This changes the followup_day2 emails delay from one day later to two days
later if it is getting delivered on any working days(i.e. Mon - Fri).
For Thursday it is compromised to next day as it would be too late to
postponed to Monday and for Friday it should be Monday.
At last actually, emails should send one hour before the above calculated so
that user can catch them when they are dealing with these kinds of stuff.
Fixes: #7078.
If user has disabled message content in missed email notifications,
we shouldn't send any informations about missed messages i.e. sender,
stream, message text, etc. to email servers.
We are already hiding this informations in email templates, but we
shoudln't expose any information about message content if user
has disabled this setting.
This changes the missed-message logic to use the new encoding
scheme for stream url fragments that prefixes them with
"{stream_id}-".
For simplicity sake, we just get a Stream object to pass to
the helper functions, and we only call get_display_recipient()
now for the HUDDLE case. (We were calling it wastefully before
for the PM case.)
This commit prefixes stream names in urls with stream ids,
so that the urls don't break when we rename streams.
strean name: foo bar.com%
before: #narrow/stream/foo.20bar.2Ecom.25
after: #narrow/stream/20-foo-bar.2Ecom.25
For new realms, everything is simple under the new scheme, since
we just parse out the stream id every time to figure out where
to narrow.
For old realms, any old URLs will still work under the new scheme,
assuming the stream hasn't been renamed (and of course old urls
wouldn't have survived stream renaming in the first place). The one
exception is the hopefully rare case of a stream name starting with
something like "99-" and colliding with another stream whose id is 99.
The way that we enocde the stream name portion of the URL is kind
of unimportant now, since we really only look at the stream id, but
we still want a safe encoding of the name that is mostly human
readable, so we now convert spaces to dashes in the stream name. Also,
we try to ensure more code on both sides (frontend and backend) calls
common functions to do the encoding.
Fixes#4713
Users having only account in one realm will not be distracted by realm
name in subject lines of every email. Users who have multiple
accounts in realms can turn this setting on and receive a
corresponding realm name in email's subject.
Tweaked by tabbott to rebase and address a few small issues.
Fixes#5489.
For messages where the entire rendered body is a message_inline_image
object, we actually don't display any text and just display the
image. These messages may have links to images which might or might
not be internal to Zulip but in both cases there is a chance of this
links being broken when accessed by an email server like Gmail that
doesn't possess the recipient user's cookies.
We don't want to have ugly looking broken images displayed in email
notifications. So we patch this by inserting a replacement for the
`message_inline_image` block in which we essentially replace the
content with the textual link.
Edited for clarity by tabbott.
We have shifted to a generic queue to send all the emails. This queue
can retry in case of network issues; this makes sure that the emails are
always sent.
I think an hour after signup is not the right time to try to get someone to
re-engage with a product.
This also makes the day1 email clearly a transactional email both in
experiencing the product and in the eyes of various anti-spam laws, and
allows us to remove the unsubscribe link.
Tim Abbott
Raymond Akornor
Vishnu Ks
Steve Howell
Abhilash Verma
Shubham Dhama
Sarah
Anders Kaseorg
Yago González
Sampriti Panda
jkiely
Aditya Bansal
Rishi Gupta
YJDave
Roman Godov
rht
Rohitt Vashishtha
Umair Khan
Robert Hönig
Harshit Bansal