An implicit coercion from an untyped dict to the TypedDict was hiding
a type error: CapturedQuery.sql was really str, not bytes. We should
always prefer dataclass over TypedDict to prevent such errors.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit adds a new test to check how the visibility policy updates
when moving messages to a topic that didn't exist previously.
This test also helps us adding coverage for the code which just
skips setting visibility_policy if there is no need to update the
value because both previous and new value of visibility policy
is INHERIT. The "actions/message_edit.py" file has 100% coverage
now and thus is removed from "not_yet_fully_covered" list.
The code for updating visibility policy values on moving messages
had two bugs.
- There was a typo in elif condition where "user_profile" was being
used instead of "user_profile_with_policy".
This commit fixes the typo.
- It was assumed that there would be no UserTopic rows for target
topic if the target topic didn't exist. But there can be such case
where some messages were sent to that topic and the user muted
the topic. But then the messages in that topic was deleted. In
such case there can be UserTopic rows for a stream-topic pair
that does not exist.
This commit fixes the code to handle such case as well and set
the visibility policy of new topic to what was set for the original
topic. This change simplifies the condition to just check whether
new_visibility_policy is equal to target_topic_visibility_policy
and skip if so, and update the visibility policy otherwise.
Due to this change, we now do not try to mute the already muted
topic if the topic is moved to a topic which didn't exist
previously and thus we modify the existing test to not expect
any INFO logs.
This commit adds tests to cover the case of message editing
not allowed due to allow_message_editing set to False and
the case when there is no limit set when moving all messages
in a topic.
The "actions/message_edit.py" file does not have 100% coverage
still and it will be addressed in the next commit.
This commit updates the logic for migrating user_topic rows
during the move-messages operation when the target topic
already has messages.
Previously, the target_topic's visibility_policy was simply
set to the original_topic's visibility_policy,
and the original_topic's visibility_policy was set to INHERIT.
This commit updates the move-messages code path to determine
the new visibility_policy depending on the visibility policies
of the original and target topics.
The target_topic's visibility_policy is then updated.
The number of db queries has increased by two:
One query corresponds to determining if 'target_topic_has_messages'.
Another query corresponds to 'get_users_with_user_topic_visibility_policy'
to determine 'target_topic_user_profile_to_visibility_policy'.
This commit fixes the comment about number of database queries
when moving message from muted topic to mention clearly about
the number of queries added due to original topic being muted.
We do not include the queries that is executed to check whether
the topic is muted or not, as they will be executed in all cases.
We previously allowed moving messages that have passed the time limit
using "change_all" value for "propagate_mode" parameter. This commit
changes the behavior to not allow moving messages (both stream and
topic edit) that have passed the time limit for non-admin and
non-moderator users.
Previously, editing topic of "(no topic)" messages was allowed
irrespective of time limit or the "edit_topic_policy" setting.
Since we are working in the direction of having "no topic" messages
feel reasonable, this commit changes the code to not consider them
as a special case and topic editing restrictions apply to them as
well now like all other messages.
We still highlight the topic edit icon in recipient bar without
hovering for "no topic" messages, but it is only shown when user
has permission to edit topics.
This commit renames the 'tornado_redirected_to_list' context
manager to 'capture_send_event_calls' to improve readability.
It also refactors the function to yield a list of events
instead of passing in a list data structure as a parameter
and appending events to it.
Improve the Notification Bot by adding a hyperlink to the new location
of a moved single message. The link will make it easier for users to
find the message in its new context.
Fixes#24604.
Previously, there was a stale code that didn't verify
if 'muted_topics' and 'user_topic' events are sent correctly.
This commit updates the test to verify if the expected
users are notified via 'muted_topics' and 'user_topic'
events.
This commit updates the move-topic codepath to perform
bulk database operations on the UserTopic record using
user_profiles for each visibility_policy instead of
previously looping over each user_profile one by one.
This commit refactors 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to perform bulk database operations and the related changes.
There is an increase in database query count because requests
to delete user_topic rows now take two queries instead of one.
This is required for logging the info for a request to delete
a non-existent user_topic row while performing bulk operations
at the same time.
The overall query count will be lower while performing
bulk operations (multiple user_profiles instead of one).
This commit updates the 'do_update_message' codepath to
update the UserTopic records regardless of visibility policy
during the "move-topic" operation.
This is required before offering new visibility policies
in the UI.
Previously, UserTopic records were moved or deleted only
for objects with a MUTED visibility policy.
Fixes: #24574
This is a prep commit that renames 'set_topic_mutes' and
'topic_is_muted' to 'set_topic_visibility_policy' and
'topic_has_visibility_policy' respectively, and refactors
them to work with any visibility_policy, not only MUTED.
Previously, when a user moves a message to another topic, the Notification
bot will post a message saying "This topic was moved here from..." This is
confusing when the topic already contains messages. The changes aims to make
the messages more clear by changing the logic for the Notification bot. When
there is already messages in the topic, the bot will post "A message was
moved here from..." or "N messages were moved here from...". The bot will
post "This topic was moved here from (somewhere) by (someone)." when the
topic is empty.
Fixes#23267.
This commit updates 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to not raise an error when deleting a UserTopic row and the user
doesn't have a visibility_policy for the topic yet, or when setting
the visibility_policy to its current value.
Also, it includes the changes to not send unnecessary events
in such cases.
In order to support different types of topic visibility policies,
this renames 'add_topic_mute' to
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
and refactors it to accept a parameter 'visibility_policy'.
Create a corresponding UserTopic row for any visibility policy,
not just muting topics.
When a UserTopic row for (user_profile, stream, topic, recipient_id)
exists already, it updates the row with the new visibility_policy.
In the event of a duplicate request, raises a JsonableError.
i.e., new_visibility_policy == existing_visibility_policy.
There is an increase in the database query count in the message-edit
code path.
Reason:
Earlier, 'add_topic_mute' used 'bulk_create' which either
creates or raises IntegrityError -- 1 query.
Now, 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy' uses get_or_create
-- 2 queries in the case of creating new row.
We can't use the previous approach, because now we have to
handle the case of updating the visibility_policy too.
Also, using bulk_* for a single row is not the correct way.
Co-authored-by: Kartik Srivastava <kaushiksri0908@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar841301@gmail.com>
This commit adds time restriction on moving messages between streams
using the move_messages_between_streams_limit_seconds setting in the
backend. There is no time limit for admins and moderators.
We now use the newly added move_messages_within_stream_limit_seconds
setting to check for how long the user can edit the topic replacing
the previously used 3-day limit. As it was previously, there is no
time limit for admins and moderators.
When 'resolve|unresolve' and 'move stream' actions occurs in
the same api call, 'This topic was marked as resolved|unresolved'
notification is not sent.
Both 'topic moved' and 'topic resolved' notification should be generated.
This commit updates the logic of when and where to send
'topic resolve|unresolve' notification. Unlike previous logic, notification
may be sent even in the case 'new_stream' is not None.
In general, 'topic resolved|unresolved' notification is sent to
'stream_being_edited'. In this particular case ('new_stream' is not None),
notification is sent to the 'new_stream' after check.
Test case is included.
Fixes: #22973
Accessing .realm will cause a fetch query from the database if the
attribute hasn't been fetched already earlier in the codepath. That's
completely redundant if we're just comparing realms, and we should only
access .realm_id attribute. This seems to eliminate a query in some
codepaths, which is nice in this performance-sensitive function.
Additionally, migrate existing EditMessageTest to use this helper
method, with the side effect of migrating the tested flow from a
/json/messages URL to a /api/v1/messages URL.
This commit changes the topic edit permssions to not depend whether the user
editing the message had sent the message or it was sent by someone else.
We only do backend changes in this commit and frontend changes will be done
in further commits.
Previously, we always allowed topic edits when the user themseleves had
sent the message not considering the edit_topic_policy and the 3-day time
limit. But now we consider all messages as same and editing is allowed only
according to edit_topic_policy setting and the time limit of 3 days in
addition for users who are not admins or moderators.
We change the topic and stream edit permssions to not depend on
allow_message_editing setting in the API and are allowed even
if allow_message_editing is set to False based on other settings
like edit_topic_policy and can_move_message_between_streams.
Fixes a part of #21739.
This solves the problem that resolving a topic with a long name (>60
characters) will cause the topic name to be truncated, and thus the edit
message code path thinks that the topic is being moved in addition to
being resolved.
We store the pre-truncation topic and use it to check against the
original topic when determining whether a topic is being moved while
getting (un)resovled or not.
Fixes#23482
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We intended to send both the "topic was resolved" and the "topic was
moved here" notification when resolving and moving a topic at the same
time in #22312.
The previous implementation did not work as expected and it was only
sending the "topic was moved here" notification.
This removes the check for old_topic and new_topic that have
RESOLVED_TOPIC_PREFIX stripped in maybe_send_resolve_notifications, so
that the notification will be sent regardless if the topic name without
the prefix stays the same or not.
Note that weird topic handling ("✔ ✔✔ some topic") in the comments
was added in e231a03eff is unaffected. In case of confusion, the lstrip
check is not essential to detecting topic being unresolved/resolved.
As we mainly have that handled in the latter part of the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This adds a helper based on testing patterns of using the "queries_captured"
context manager with "assert_length" to check the number of queries
executed for preventing performance regression.
It explains the rationale of checking the query count through an
"AssertionError" and prints the queries captured as assert_length does,
but with a format optimized for displaying the queries in a more
readable manner.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Previously we did not send notification for topic-only edits.
Now, we add backend support for sending notification to topic-only
edits as well.
We would add support for this in webapp in further commits since
message edit UI will be updated as well. We just make sure that no
notifications are sent when editing topic using pencil icon in
message header.
We also change the API default for moving a topic to only notify the
new location, not the old one; this matches the current defaults in
the web UI.
Includes many tests.
We also update the puppeteer tests to test only content edit as
we are going to change the UI to not allow topic editing from
message edit UI. Also fixing the existing tests to pass while
doing topic edits is somewhat complex as notification message
is also sent to new topic by default.
Fixes#21712.
Co-authored-by: Aman Agrawal <amanagr@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This is preparatory commit for #18941.
Importing `do_delete_message` from `message_edit.py` was causing a
circular import error. In order to avoid that, we create a separate
message_delete.py file which has all the functions related to deleting
messages.
The tests for deleting messages are present in
`zerver/tests/test_message_edit.py`.
Fixes a part of #18941
This commit changes the code to consider zero as an invalid value for
message_content_edit_time_limit_seconds. Now to represent the setting that
user can edit the message anytime, the setting value will be "None" in
database and "unlimited" will be passed to API from clients.
Since we not allow enabling public access on limited plan realms,
we set the enable_spectator_access setting to False when downgrading
to a limited plan. Setting is still shown in the UI but it is
disabled.
Since `HttpResponse` is an inaccurate representation of the
monkey-patched response object returned by the Django test client, we
replace it with `_MonkeyPatchedWSGIResponse` as `TestHttpResponse`.
This replaces `HttpResponse` in zerver/tests, analytics/tests, coporate/tests,
zerver/lib/test_classes.py, and zerver/lib/test_helpers.py with
`TestHttpResponse`. Several files in zerver/tests are excluded
from this substitution.
This commit is auto-generated by a script, with manual adjustments on certain
files squashed into it.
This is a part of the django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit changes the error message from "Invalid stream id"
to "Invalid stream ID" for cases where invalid stream IDs are
passed to API endpoints to make it consistent with other similar
error messages.
We were not setting the `historical` flag correctly for
messages fetched via `json_fetch_raw_message` when used didn't
have any UserMessage.
Extended relevant tests to fetch check message flags too.
This avoids an error when a user has already muted the new topic name.
We do this by ignoring duplicates, rather than catching the
IntegrityError, because this edit happens in a transaction, and that
would abort the transaction.
Our original implementation of moving muted topic records when a topic
is moved took a shortcut of treating all change_later usage as
something with intent to move the whole topic.
This works OK when moving the whole topic via this interface, but not
when moving a last off-topic message in the topic.
Address this by changing the rule to match the existing
moved_all_visible_messages variable.
Previously, Attachment.is_realm_public and its cousin,
Attachment.is_web_public, were properties that began as False and
transitioned to True only when a message containing a link to the
attachment was sent to the appropriate class of stream, or such a link
was added as part of editing a message.
This pattern meant that neither field was updated in situations where
the access permissions for a message changed:
* Moving the message to a different stream.
* Changing the permissions for a stream containing links to the message.
This correctness issue has limited security impact, because uploaded
files are secured both by a random URL and by these access checks.
To fix this, we reformulate these fields as a cache, with code paths
that change the permissions affecting an attachment responsible for
setting these values to the `None` (uncached) state. We prefer setting
this `None` state over computing the correct permissions, because the
correct post-edit permissions are a function of all messages
containing the attachment, and we don't want to be responsible for
fetching all of those messages in the edit code paths.
Add support for moving MutedTopic entries to another stream where
the user has access to shared history in both streams and
`propagate_mode != "change_one"`.
Also, we delete them the current user does not have access to the
target stream.
Previously, when a topic was edited (including being resolved), it
would become unmuted for any users who had muted it, which was
annoying.
While it's not possible to determine the user's intent completely,
this is clearly incorrect behavior in the `change_all` case, such as
resolving a topic.
The comments discuss some scenarios where we might want to enhance
this further, but this is the best we can do without large increases
in complexity.
Fixes#15210.
Co-authored-by: akshatdalton <akshat.dak@students.iiit.ac.in>
Previously, this URL just returned the `raw_content` field. It seems
cleanest to just make it a single-message variant of GET /messages,
deprecating the only format.
Since we've changed the database to contain these new fields, we just
need to stop dropping them in the API code.
This also changes the public API to match the database format again
by removing `prev_subject` from edit history API.
Adds an API changelog feature update for the renamed `prev_subject`
field (to `prev_topic`) and new fields (`topic` and `stream`)
in the message `edit_history`.
Also, documents said `edit_history` in the `MessagesBase` schema
in the api documentation, which is used by the `/get-messages`,
`/get-events` and `/zulip-outgoing-webhooks` endpoints.
Fixes#21076.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn.menard@gmail.com>
Now that we have code to support reading prev_topic, this is no longer
necessary.
We'll want to deploy this change to production before running the
migration to remove prev_subject from edit history entries, so that
prev_subject can be fully purged from the database.
We modify the message_edit_history marshalling code so that this
commit does not change the API, since we haven't backfilled the data
yet.
FormattedEditHistoryEvent, introduced in the previous commit, doesn't
directly inherit fields from EditHistoryEvent, so no changes are
required there.
Various backend tests use the `PATCH /messages/{msg_id}` endpoint.
For that endpoint, the message ID is encoded in the URL path and
ignored if provided as a parameter in the the query.
Verified that the tests were providing the same message ID to both
the path and then removed the ignored parameter in the query.
The message ID is encoded in the URL, not the PATCH parameters, so
this argument was ignored. I verified that it appears to have always
matched the value present in the URL.
The new logic better matches reasonable user expectations, that if you
move all the messages, that's a whole-topic move, regardless of which
propagation mode you selected.
When moving only part of a topic, it's useful to display that
information to users in these notifications so that it's clear what's
happening.
The most important consequence is actually just increasing confidence
that when you see that the whole topic was moved, that's accurate.
Substantially modified by tabbott.
Fixes#20575.
Previously, users found it annoying that the automated "Resolve topic"
notifications triggered an unread for everyone in the stream; this
discouraged some users from using the feature on older threads for
fear of being annoying. We change this to a better default, of only
users who participated in the topic (via either messages or reactions)
being eligible for the new message being unread.
We will likely want to create global and stream-level notifications
settings to control this behavior as a follow-up -- some users, like
me, might prefer the simpler "Always unread" behavior in some streams.
Note that the automated notifications that a topic was resolved will
still result in the topic being moved to the top of the left sidebar.
This would be somewhat difficult to change, since the left sidebar
algorithm just looks at the highest message ID in the topic.
Fixes#19709.
Tests added by Aman Agrawal (amanagr@zulip.com).
Under the unicodedata distributed with Python 3.6, some Emoji are
classified as `Cn`, and not `So`:
```
$ unicode 1f929 --long
U+1F929 GRINNING FACE WITH STAR EYES
UTF-8: f0 9f a4 a9 UTF-16BE: d83edd29 Decimal: 🤩 Octal: \0374451
🤩
Category: So (Symbol, Other); East Asian width: W (wide)
Unicode block: 1F900..1F9FF; Supplemental Symbols and Pictographs
Bidi: ON (Other Neutrals)
$ python3.6 -c 'import unicodedata; print(unicodedata.category("\U0001f929"))'
Cn
$ python3.7 -c 'import unicodedata; print(unicodedata.category("\U0001f929"))'
So
```
Drop `Cn` from the list of excluded Unicode character classes, and
replace it with an explicit list of the 66 non-characters, which are
invariant.
Co-authored-by: Shlok Patel <shlokcpatel2001@gmail.com>
An explanatory note on the changes in zulip.yaml and
curl_param_value_generators is warranted here. In our automated
tests for our curl examples, the test for the API endpoint that
changes the posting permissions of a stream comes before our
existing curl test for adding message reactions.
Since there is an extra notification message due to the change in
posting permissions, the message IDs used in tests that come after
need to be incremented by 1.
This is a part of #20289.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
This commit adds code to check whether a user is allowed to use
wildcard mention in a large stream or not while editing a message
based on the realm settings.
Previously this was only checked while sending message, thus user
was easily able to use wildcard mention by first sending a normal
message and then using a wildcard mention by editing it.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
`rendered_content` in historical messages may be empty; examining the
history of them may thus require diff'ing two empty strings, which
itself produces an empty string.
Use `lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` to be able to successfully parse
these, rather than 500.
Part of #19559.
Since the calls to the translation function `_()` are made outside
of the `send_message_moved_breadcrumbs` function, these strings are
translated outside of the `with override_language` block, leading to
translated strings even when we don't intend them to be translated.
We now use gettext_lazy with appropriate testing to avoid this.
This commit replaces 'allow_message_deleting' boolean setting
with an integer setting 'delete_own_message_policy'. We have a
separate dropdown now for deciding which user-roles can delete
messages sent by themselves and the time-limit setting droddown
is different.
This new setting has two options - everyone and admins only. Other
options including moderators will be added further.
We also remove the "Never" option from the original time-limit
dropdown, as admins are always allowed to delete message. This
never option resembled the case of only admins being allowed to
delete but this state is now resembled by setting the dropdown
to "admins only" and we also disable the time-limit dropdown in
this case as admins are allowed to delete irrespective of limit.
Note, this setting is only for deleting messages sent by the
deleting user themselves, and only admins are allowed to delete
messages sent by others as before.
We make zero invalid value for message_content_delete_limit_seconds and
for handling the case of "Allow to delete message any time", the API-level
value of message_content_delete_limit_seconds is "anytime" and "None"
as the DB-level value. We also use these values for message retention
setting, so it helps maintain consistency.
This adds a new class called MessageRenderingResult to contain the
additional properties we added to the Message object (like alert_words)
as well as the rendered content to ensure typesafe reference. No
behavioral change is made except changes in typing.
This is a preparatory change for adding django-stubs to the backend.
Related: #18777
We already have this data in the `flags` for each user, so no need to
send this set/list in the event dictionary.
The `flags` in the event dict represent the after-message-update state,
so we can't avoid sending `prior_mention_user_ids`.
Previously, it was possible for an unusual series of topic-edit
actions to result in Notification Bot reporting that a topic was
marked as resolved that had already been marked as resolved, etc.
A buggy client might send a message_edit request to change the topic
field, sending the current topic as the new value. Previously, we
would treat that as a normal request to edit the topic; now we act as
though the API request had not requested a topic change. In the
common case that only the topic was in the edit request, this now
results in an error that should help client implementations identify
their bug.
This fixes a bad interaction with the "unresolve topic" logic, which
assumed that upstream logic had verified that the topic was actually
changing.
This is a prep commit for adding members, full members and moderator
options to edit_topic_policy. As we will be adding tests for these
options, we will need to add a login statment repeatedly and this
helps us in avoiding that.
This is a prep commit for adding moderators, full
members and member roles in edit_topic_policy.
As we add these new options, we will add tests with
user with all these roles and thus we would need to
login as iago repeatedly when changing parameters.
So, to avoid this we instead login as Iago in
set_message_editing_params itself.
This commit replaces the allow_community_topic_editing boolean with
integer field edit_topic_policy and includes both frontend and
backend changes.
We also update settings_ui.disable_sub_settings_onchange to not
change the color of label as we did previously when the setting
was a checkbox. But now as the setting is dropdown we keep the
label as it is and we don't do anything with label when disabling
dropdowns. Also, this function was used only here so we can safely
change this.
Further commits will start locking the message rows while
adding related fields like reactions or submessages,
to handle races caused by deleting the message itself at the
same time.
The message locking implemented then will create a possibility
of deadlocks, where the related field transaction holds a lock
on the message row, and the message-delete transaction holds a
lock on the database row of the related field (which will also
need to be deleted when the message is deleted), and both
transactions wait for each other.
To prevent such a deadlock, we lock the message itself while
it is being deleted, so that the message-delete transaction
will have to wait till the other transaction (which is about
to delete the related field, and also holds a lock on the
message row) commits.
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/near/1185943 has more details.
This commit fixes a bug where moving messages between streams was
not allowed for non-admins when allow_community_topic_editing was
set to false and move_messages_between_streams_policy was set to
Realm.POLICY_MEMBERS_ONLY.
The bug is fixed by calling can_edit_content_or_topic only when
topic or content edit is there and not in the case where only
message is moved from one stream to another.
Anders Kaseorg
Sahil Batra
Prakhar Pratyush
Akarsh Jain
Joelute
Kartik Srivastava
Lauryn Menard
Mateusz Mandera
Josh Klar
Zixuan James Li
Julia Bichler
madrix01
Zixuan James Li
Alex Vandiver
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Lauryn Menard
Shubh Gupta
Sharif Naas
Eeshan Garg
Steve Howell
sahil839
akshatdalton
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas