We now allow users to change email address visibility setting
on the "Terms of service" page during first login. This page is
not shown for users creating account using normal registration
process, but is useful for imported users and users created
through API, LDAP, SCIM and management commands.
This implements the core of the rewrite described in:
For the backend data model for UserPresence to one that supports much
more efficient queries and is more correct around handling of multiple
clients. The main loss of functionality is that we no longer track
which Client sent presence data (so we will no longer be able to say
using UserPresence "the user was last online on their desktop 15
minutes ago, but was online with their phone 3 minutes ago"). If we
consider that information important for the occasional investigation
query, we have can construct that answer data via UserActivity
already. It's not worth making Presence much more expensive/complex
to support it.
For slim_presence clients, this sends the same data format we sent
before, albeit with less complexity involved in constructing it. Note
that we at present will always send both last_active_time and
last_connected_time; we may revisit that in the future.
This commit doesn't include the finalizing migration, which drops the
UserPresenceOld table.
The way to deploy is to start the backfill migration with the server
down and then start the server *without* the user_presence queue worker,
to let the migration finish without having new data interfering with it.
Once the migration is done, the queue worker can be started, leading to
the presence data catching up to the current state as the queue worker
goes over the queued up events and updating the UserPresence table.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
We previously created RealmAuditLog entries for user notification
settings only. This commit changes the code to create entries for
all user settings. We cannot backfill the entries since we don't
have the data to do that.
This commits update the code to use user-level email_address_visibility
setting instead of realm-level to set or update the value of UserProfile.email
field and to send the emails to clients.
Major changes are -
- UserProfile.email field is set while creating the user according to
RealmUserDefault.email_address_visbility.
- UserProfile.email field is updated according to change in the setting.
- 'email_address_visibility' is added to person objects in user add event
and in avatar change event.
- client_gravatar can be different for different users when computing
avatar_url for messages and user objects since email available to clients
is dependent on user-level setting.
- For bots, email_address_visibility is set to EVERYONE while creating
them irrespective of realm-default value.
- Test changes are basically setting user-level setting instead of realm
setting and modifying the checks accordingly.
Previously, user objects contained delivery_email field
only when user had access to real email. Also, delivery_email
was not present if visibility setting is set to "everyone"
as email field was itself set to real email.
This commit changes the code to pass "delivery_email" field
always in the user objects with its value being "None" if
user does not have access to real email and real email otherwise.
The "delivery_email" field value is None for logged-out users.
For bots, the "delivery_email" is always set to real email
irrespective of email_address_visibility setting.
Also, since user has access to real email if visibility is set
to "everyone", "delivery_email" field is passed in that case
too.
There is no change in email field and it is same as before.
This commit also adds code to send event to update delivery_email
field when email_address_visibility setting changes to all the
users whose access to emails changes and also changes the code to
send event on changing delivery_email to users who have access
to email.
In zerver.management.commands.logout_all_users,
we pass a values queryset containing the ids into
this function, which is not actually a list. This
broadens the type annotation so that the ValuesQuerySet
is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`extra_data` as a `TextField` expects a `str`, but we had been passing
`dict` instead. This is a temporary solution before #18391 to fix the
type annotation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Sahil Batra
Tim Abbott
Zixuan James Li
Adam Sah
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg