On realms with large numbers of custom emoji, the typeahead emoji picker
often isn't useful. This is exacerbated by the fact the picker prefers
longer matches, so if there are five emoji that share a prefix, and an
emoji that is just the prefix, the only-prefix emoji will never show in
the typeahead emoji picker. This means that if someone thinks that there
is an emoji that shares a prefix with many other emoji, but they don't
remember for sure, they cannot use the typeahead emoji picker to check
that the emoji that they are entering exists.
There are two "real" fixes to this, neither of which this commit
addresses:
First, we should adjust the emoji ranking code such that exact string
matches for existing emojis are always shown in the picker. This would
be an improvement overall (the current behaviour is surprising and
frustrating), but it doesn't fundamentally solve the problem - if there
are many matching emoji, some of them will be pushed off the list.
Second, we should allow scrolling through the entire list of matching
entries in a typeahead, instead of only looping through the top N
matches. This will completely fix the problem (although there is some
UI/UX consideration in how to make it clear that the box is scrollable),
but seems like significantly more work to implement.
However, increasing the typeahead box size should improve the user
experience here independently of either of those changes.
I've chosen 8 as the max size for no particularly principled reason -
the fact that it's larger than 5 makes it more useful, but it's not so
large that it covers an obnoxious amount of the screen. Possibly it
would make sense to make it a bit bigger, but 8 seems like a good place
to start.
I've tested this on my laptop, which has a Intel i5-7200U CPU (~4.5 years
old, middle of the line when it was released) on a test instance with
5000 users, as well as on chat.zulip.org, and didn't see any noticeable
performance regression in completing @-mentions or emoji on either.
This means that in steady-state, `zulip-puppet-apply` is expected to
produce no changes or commands to execute. The verification step of
`setup-apt-repo` is quite fast, so this cleans up the output for very
little cost.
This warning was added in #6551. It’s not for any version of the
current Electron app, which we warn about on the server side with
DESKTOP_WARNING_VERSION, but rather some pre-Electron app so ancient I
don’t even know what it is. Apparently it communicated using the
window.bridge global, so eradicate that too.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Appling i18 to reaction tooltips (#16585) caused usernames to be
double-escaped, for instance, if there is a single-quote in a username.
This disables escaping of usernames by i18next, since they're escaped
again later by the rendering code.
Fixes: #16785
Usually we increase the opacity of an interactable icon on hover, but the search-icon at the top of the
right sidebar was missing the behavior.
Co-authored-by: ritik <ritikcn05@gmail.com>
test_signup: This test was wrong, because the inviter UserProfile was
from a different realm. Such a PreregistrationUser shouldn't be
considered valid.
test_tutorial: The direct call to internal_send_private_message was
using sender's realm as the realm argument which is not valid. It
doesn't lead to any error because the codepath seems to mostly not care
about the realm arg if the sender is a cross-realm bot. From my reading
of the code I think that wrong realm arg here would break user mentions,
because it makes its way to check_message() and then to
build_message_send_dict - but overall the message gets sent without
errors. Either way, this was a bug in the test and should be fixed.
Currently, the ID and Type fields didn't have a description,
and weren't being displayed. Added a schema component to add
descriptions, and display on the api page. Fixes part of #15967.
This commmit includes ROLE_MODERATOR in realm_user_count_by_role.
We also update test_change_role in test_audit_log.py to include
changes for moderator role as well.
Note that at this point, it's not possible to create moderator users;
this just will make it easier to write tests for logic involving them
as we develop the feature.
Have not included "ROLE_MODERATOR" in UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES
in this commit because did not want to update the openapi
docs at this stage as it will be a user-facing change and
not updating the openapi docs with moderator role included in
UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES gives error in ./tools/check-schemas.
‘function’ and ‘=>’ are not equivalent because they bind ‘this’
differently. For these functions, the ‘function’ semantics are
intentional.
This reverts part of commit 1a241cef88
(#17388).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The `message_id` was made an `str` object because
the request expected `Dict[str, str]`. The request is now
casted to `Dict[str, Any]` to fix the issue and removed
typecast of `message_id` to str.
python-zulip-api reference:
https://github.com/zulip/python-zulip-api/pull/653
We now call $.clear_all_elements at the top
of run_test.
We have to exempt two modules from the new regime:
compose
settings_user_groups
Also, if modules do set_global("$", ...) we don't
try to call the non-existent function.
It's possible we'll want to move to something like
this, but we might want to clean up the two
sloppy_$ modules first:
// AVOID THIS:
// const $ = require("zjquery")
run_test("test widget", ({override, $}) => {
override(foo, "bar", ...);
$.create(...);
// do stuff
});
Steve Howell
Wesley Aptekar-Cassels
nikhilmaske-2001
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver
aryanshridhar
Megamind
Mateusz Mandera
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Ganesh Pawar
sahil839
LoopThrough-i-j