We had this API:
people.add_in_realm = full-fledged user
people.add = not necessarily in realm
Now the API is this:
people.add = full-fledged user
people._add_user = internal API for cross-realm bots
and deactivated users
I think in most of our tests the distinction between
people.add() and people.add_in_realm() was just an
accident of history and didn't reflect any real intention.
And if I had to guess the intention in 99% of the cases,
folks probably thought they were just creating ordinary,
active users in the current realm.
In places where the distinction was obviously important
(because a test failed), I deactivated the user via
`people.deactivate`.
For the 'basics' test in the people test suite, I clean
up the test setup for Isaac. Before this commit I was
adding him first as a non-realm user then as a full-fledged
user, but this was contrived and confusing, and we
didn't really need it for test coverage purposes.
Explicitly stubbing i18n in 48 different files
is mostly busy work at this point, and it doesn't
provide much signal, since often it's invoked
only to satisfy transitive dependencies.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Apparently, our use of JavaScript string `.replace()` here was buggy,
because replace() has several special escape sequences starting with
`$` if they appear in the replacement content string. We can work
around this through something of a hack, which is to pass a function
as the second argument to replace, which seems cleaner than replacing
all $s with $$s.
Thanks to Shreya for the report.
The correct behavior here is that we want to ensure there is
whitespace in between the syntax being added and the content on either
side. Our smart_insert logic handled this for the cases that were
common with inserting emoji (etc.), but didn't handle the more complex
cases with "quote and reply".
Fixes#11702.
This run_test helper sets up a convention that allows
us to give really short tracebacks for errors, and
eventually we can have more control over running
individual tests. (The latter goal has some
complications, since we often intentionally leak
setup in tests.)
This appends a space when text is inserted at the end of a message
using `compose_ui.insert_syntax_and_focus`. This is definitely what
users expect when using this feature.
Fixes: #8569.
This fixes compose.test_video_link_compose_clicked to just
use a stub for compose_ui.insert_syntax_and_focus.
It also adds direct tests for compose_ui.insert_syntax_and_focus.
Fixes#6362
clarammdantas
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Vinit Singh
Tim Abbott
Marco Burstein
Shubham Dhama