I rewrote most of tools/lib/pretty-printer.py, which
was fairly easy due to being able to crib some
important details from the previous implementation.
The main motivation for the rewrite was that we weren't
handling else/elif blocks correctly, and it was difficult
to modify the previous code. The else/elif shortcomings
were somewhat historical in nature--the original parser
didn't recognize them (since they weren't in any Zulip
templates at the time), and then the pretty printer was
mostly able to hack around that due to the "nudge"
strategy. Eventually the nudge strategy became too
brittle.
The "nudge" strategy was that we would mostly trust
the existing templates, and we would just nudge over
some lines in cases of obviously faulty indentation.
Now we are bit more opinionated and rigorous, and
we basically set the indentation explicitly for any
line that is not in a code/script block. This leads
to this diff touching several templates for mostly
minor fix-ups.
We aren't completely opinionated, as we respect the
author's line wrapping decisions in many cases, and
we also allow authors not to indent blocks within
the template language's block constructs.
This reverses the policy that was set, but incompletely enforced, by
commit 951514dd7d. The self-closing tag
syntax is clearer, more consistent, simpler to parse, compatible with
XML, preferred by Prettier, and (most importantly now) required by
FormatJS.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We're migrating to using the cleaner zulip.com domain, which involves
changing all of our links from ReadTheDocs and other places to point
to the cleaner URL.
Punctuate marketing headings with a period. Fix a couple of
title-cased headings to sentense case. Consistently use curly
apostrophes, curly quotation marks, and Unicode ellipses.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The `overflow: auto;` from the `.markdown` class hides the description
of the picture. I moved the description outside the div with the
`markdown` class.
I didn't remove zulip_version from context_processors since it seems likely
that we'll want to put that information somewhere on portico at some point.
This commit transitions landing-page.css from the Django pipeline
to being compiled by webpack as landing-page.scss under the
'landing-page' and 'integration' bundles.
Apparently, essentially every one of our landing pages extending
portico.html had two copies of portico.css included in their head
section; one from porticocustomhead (or the super of customhead) and
the other directly included.
Clean this up by removing all these duplicate inclusions of the
portico stylesheet.
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Alexandra Ciobica
Rishi Gupta
Armaan Ahluwalia
Tim Abbott