This adds a new special UserProfile flag can_change_user_emails(disabled
by default) and the ability for changing the email address of users in
the realm via update_user_backend. This is useful for allowing
organizations to update user emails without needing to set up a SCIM
integration, but since it gives the ability to hijack user accounts, it
needs to be behind this additional permission and can't be just given to
organization owners by default. Analogical to how the
create_user_backend endpoint works.
Creates a new "realm_deactivated" email that can be sent to realm
owners as part of `do_deactivate_realm`, via a boolean flag,
`email_owners`.
This flag is set to `False` when `do_deactivate_realm` is used for
realm exports or changing a realm's subdomain, so that the active
organization owners are not emailed in those cases.
This flag is optional for the `deactivate_realm` management command,
but as there is no active user passed in that case, then the email
is sent without referencing who deactivated the realm.
It is passed as `True` for the support analytics view, but the email
that is generated does not include information about the support
admin user who completed the request for organization deactivation.
When an active organization owner deactivates the organization, then
the flag is `True` and an email is sent to them as well as any other
active organization owners, with a slight variation in the email text
for those two cases.
Adds specific tests for when `email_owners` is passed as `True`. All
existing tests for other functionality of `do_deactivate_user` pass
the flag as `False`.
Adds `localize` from django.util.formats as a jinja env filter so
that the dates in these emails are internationlized for the owner's
default language setting in the "realm_deactivated" email templates.
Fixes#24685.
It's going to be helpful in the future to record the reason for realm
deactivation.
- For information tracking
- For making a distinction between cases where we can allow realm owners
to reactivate their realm via a self-serve flow (e.g.
"owner_request") vs where we can't (ToS abuse).
This commit renames reset_emails_in_zulip_realm function to
reset_email_visibility_to_everyone_in_zulip_realm which makes
it more clear to understand what the function actually does.
This commit also adds a comment explaining what this function
does.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Mypy can’t follow absolute imports based on directories other than the
root. This was hiding some type errors due to ignore_missing_imports.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Fixes#17795
In PR #17014, we added support for deactivate-own-user.
And while doing so, we first deactivated the client and
then reactivated it. But this implementation is a bit
hacky.
So, to fix this, we're now deactivating a test_user so that
we don't have to reactivate it. We did so by changing the value
of authentication_line.
As we want to keep endpoint code out of the
“test_curl_examples”, we changed the value of
authentication_line in `curl_param_value_generators.py`.
To work this out, we create a new global variable named
AUTHENTICATION_LINE in “curl_param_value_generators.py”
and change its value in function “deactivate_own_user” and
to use this change in “test_curl_examples,” we import
AUTHENTICATION_LINE.
AUTHENTICATION_LINE is of list data type because we want a
pointer to original mutable object so that changes made during
run time show across the module. Another way to do this is to change
the way we import variable, but that will be inconsistent to
the way we had in all other files.
To remove confusion between AUTHENTICATION_LINE and
authentication_line we renamed authentication_line
to default_authentication_line.
In `validate_account_and_subdomain` we check
if user's realm is not deactivated. In case
of failure of this check, we raise our standard
JsonableError. While this works well in most
cases but it creates difficulties in handling
of users with deactivated realms for non-browser
clients.
So we register a new REALM_DEACTIVATED error
code so that clients can distinguish if error
is because of deactivated account. Following
these changes `validate_account_and_subdomain`
raises RealmDeactivatedError if user's realm
is deactivated.
This error is also documented in
`/api/rest-error-handling`.
Testing: I have mostly relied on automated
backend tests to test this.
Fixes#17763.
In validate_account_and_subdomain we check if
user's account is not deactivated. In case of
failure of this check we raise our standard
JsonableError. While this works well in most
cases but it creates difficulties in handling
of deactivated accounts for non-browser clients.
So we register a new USER_DEACTIVATED error
code so that clients can distinguish if error
is because of deactivated account. Following
these changes `validate_account_and_subdomain`
raises UserDeactivatedError if user's account
is deactivated.
This error is also documented in
`/api/rest-error-handling`.
Testing: I have mostly relied on automated
backend tests to test this.
Partially addresses issue #17763.
Currently, there was no markdown page for deactivate-own-user API
endpoint. Created deactivate-own-user.md for the API page and
created a new owner client in test-api to reactivate the client
deactivated during testing.
Also changed endpoint name from deactivate-my-account to
deactivate-own-user, for better consistency with other endpoints.
Fixes#16163.
This commit renames --force argument used with various tests to
--skip-provision-check. As a consequence of this name change all other
files that set --force option for the test commands have been updated.
This change is done in order to provide more clarity for using this
option for runnning tests.
This commit addresses issue #17455.
This commit moves --force option used with various tests to
test-scripts.py to have it alongside the logic that does provisioning
status assertion.
This is a step towards providing more clarity over use of this
argument with tests as asked in issue #17455.
Allowing any admins to create arbitrary users is not ideal because it
can lead to abuse issues. We should require something stronger that
requires the server operator's approval and thus we add a new
can_create_users permission.
A few major themes here:
- We remove short_name from UserProfile
and add the appropriate migration.
- We remove short_name from various
cache-related lists of fields.
- We allow import tools to continue to
write short_name to their export files,
and then we simply ignore the field
at import time.
- We change functions like do_create_user,
create_user_profile, etc.
- We keep short_name in the /json/bots
API. (It actually gets turned into
an email.)
- We don't modify our LDAP code much
here.
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This commit adds python code to call javascript_examples.js in its
two supported modes. tools/test-api asserts that the example output
is as expected, whereas the API markdown extension is used to render
these examples in the docs.
We now restrict emails on the zulip realm, and now
`email` and `delivery_email` will be different for
users.
This change should make it more likely to catch
errors where we leak delivery emails or use the
wrong field for lookups.
Upcoming changes in test_generated_curl_examples_for_success modifies
various data of iago user heavily. So it's much easier to run
test_the_api initially than making various changes in tests of
test_the_api function.
This new test runs each generated curl example against the Zulip API,
checking whether it returns successfully without errors.
Significantly modified by tabbott for simplicity.
django.setup is already called (with different/better environment
variables) inside test_server_running; we shouldn't be calling it just
before that to make imports work.
I discovered this because imports done at the wrong time would
potentially incorrectly have `testserver` as the EXTERNAL_HOST.
Now reading API keys from a user is done with the get_api_key wrapper
method, rather than directly fetching it from the user object.
Also, every place where an action should be done for each API key is now
using get_all_api_keys. This method returns for the moment a single-item
list, containing the specified user's API key.
This commit is the first step towards allowing users have multiple API
keys.
This commit adds tests for the fixture for when a user is not
authorized (perhaps because the query requires the use of admin
privileges) for a particular query.
In templates/zerver/api/update-message.md, we have a sample fixture
for when a zulip.Client does not have the permission to update/edit
a particular message. This commit adds a test for that fixture.
Also, tools/test-api now also uses a non-admin client for this test,
which might come in handy in the future.
We now have a separate page for common error payloads, for example,
the payload for when the client's API key is invalid. All error
payloads that are presented on this page will be tested similarly
to our other non-error sample fixtures.
Now that the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples depended on code in the
tools/lib/* directory, it caused the production tests to fail since
the tools/ directory wouldn't exist in a production environment.
Mateusz Mandera
Shubham Padia
Lauryn Menard
Anders Kaseorg
Sahil Batra
100RABHpy
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
shanukun
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Rohitt Vashishtha
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
Vishnu Ks
Hemanth V. Alluri
Tim Abbott
Aman Agrawal
Anders Kaseorg
Yago González
Eeshan Garg
rht