The previous version with e.target would give the element that was
clicked lying inside an element with '.view_user_profile'.
One would usually expect "data-user-id" to be attached to the
same element with ".view_user_profile" instead of any of its children.
So, to just look for "data-user-id" in the element with that class,
instead of any of its chidren, this commit changes e.target to
e.currentTarget.
We show tooltip for user read receipts setting mentioning
that the organization has disabled read receipts setting
when an organization does so. We hide the tooltip when
organization read receipts setting is enabled.
We also fix the alignment of "i" icons with label and headings
at various places by moving it 1 pixel below. There may be
some places where it is not fixed, but those will be fixed
separately.
This commit adds support to change enable_read_receipts
setting through API and also adds the field to response
of "/register" endpoint so that the setting value
is available to clients.
This reverts commit 46b289cbda.
This commit didn’t pass Node tests independently of the PR #21726 that
it was split from, because pm_list is mocked.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit is a preparatory commit which introduces
`handle_narrow_deactivated` and `handle_narrow_activated`
functions in pm_list.js, separately from top_left_corner.js,
to reduce the complexity of handling private messages section
separately.
The text inside save/discard widget buttons was misaligned with
respect to the icon in the button. To align it properly, we add
vertical-align and a reduced line-height property to the span.
Fixes: #20583.
Resolves the issue by aligning the buttons with the text.
It's not entirely clear why text-bottom is the correct alignment, but
visually it seems to be correct.
Fixes: #20583.
This code is actually a noop (and would be a bug if it wasn't a noop),
because when this runs the server is already initialized, meaning the
internal realm exists and the system bots have been created, so
UserProfile.objects.filter(email=email) is always truthy. Also, system
bots are supposed to live in the internal realm, not in the realm being
imported so this code doesn't make sense currently.
This ensures type safety by not mutating the original queryset values,
that django-stubs to type as a TypedDict without total=False.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
BACKEND_DATABASE_TEMPLATE was introduced in a507a47778.
This setting is only available for the test cases and it is not that
necessary to have it configurable.
We define it as a global variable in zerver.lib.test_fixtures.
This avoids requiring mypy_django_plugin to know the type of
settings.BACKEND_DATABASE_TEMPLATE for type checking purposes, given the fact
that settings.test_extra_settings is not available in production/development
setup.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This ensures that CAMO_KEY is always defined, so that mypy_django_plugin
will be able to identify its type.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We now use EVERYONE_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use MEMBERS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use MODERATORS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use ADMINISTRATORS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we can
have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use OWNERS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that
we can have all the group names coded at one place
only.
We now use EVERYONE_ON_INTERNET_GROUP_NAME instead of
writing the actual group name at multiple places, so
that we can have all the group names coded at one place
only.
We now use FULL_MEMBERS_GROUP_NAME instead of
writing the actual full members system group
name at multiple places, so that we can have
all the group names coded at one place only.
There may be some internal realms which were created after applying
"0382_create_role_based_system_groups.py" migration and this migration
is used to create system groups for those realms.
This commit modifies bulk_create_users to add the users to the
respective system groups. And due to this change, now bots in
development environment are also added to system groups.
Tests are changed accordingly as more UserGroupMembeship objects
are created.
Since we include internal realms while creating system groups
in "0382_create_role_based_system_groups.py", we should do it
when creating new internal realms as well to be consistent.
Tests are changed accordingly as UserGroup objects are created.
We also change the user group ids used in api docs examples
such that user groups are of correct realm.
This includes the change from 28fde2ee27.
Only a minor bump is required because it has no effect on type
checking yet before django-stubs gets integrated.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
It was introduced in
56b2b838ee commit.
It fixes `test_narrow_public_streams` test which checks
that, there are no bookends in ` /streams/public`. The
issue was there were no bookends by default when we
were checking in the Denmark stream. We fix this by
unsubscribing from the Denmark stream which will
create a bookend.
I found the previous model for computing what settings to use for
streams increasingly difficult to understand, which is generally a
recipe for future bugs.
Refactor to have a clear computation of what complete permissions
state the client is requesting, validate that state, and then pass
that state to the do_change_stream_permission.
We now allow changing access to history of the stream by only passing
"history_public_to_subscribers" parameter. Previously, "is_private"
parameter was also required to change history_public_to_subscribers
otherwise the request was silently ignored.
We also raise error when only history_public_to_subscribers parameter
is passed with value False without "is_private: True" for a public
or web-public stream since we do not allow public streams with
protected history.
We raise error when we try to change a public stream (except for
zephyr mirror realms) to be public with protected history, as we do
not support such streams yet.
Previously, in such case we changed nothing and a notification was
sent to the "stream events" topic with message being "stream is
changed from public to public" and was weird.
Note that this commit only handles the case when both is_private and
history_public_to_subscribers parameters are passed to API and commit
not covers the case when only "history_public_to_subscribers" with
value False is passed to API, since we currently ignore requests
which has only history_public_to_subscribers parameter with not None
and not is_private and is_web_public.
We would do this in further commits when we add support for accepting
only history_public_to_subscribers parameter.
This commit removes the unnecessary assertion statements in
do_change_stream_permission for case when "is_web_public" is
True, since we already check those cases in the view function
update_stream_backend and this is the only place from where
do_change_stream_permission is called.
We aim to remove other assertions also from there as mentioned
in the comment and instead check the values in caller itself.
This is a prep commit for changing do_change_stream_permission
to require passing all (invite_only, history_public_to_subscribers
and is_web_public) arguments in further commits.
Currently, if we navigate to some other topic/stream
while the message is being moved, the message edit UI
still remains open as we do not get its `row` in
`message_lists.current` since the message has not moved yet
to the stream/topic we navigated.
Hence the correct thing to do would be to delete
the message_id from `currently_editing_messages` if it
exists there but we cannot find the row.
Fixes#21724.
Previously, the topic_edited and stream_changed variables were
incorrectly used outside the loop over events, in a way that meant
we'd use the values of these from the last event, when we clearly
meant to use whether, for example, the current stream was changed.
In practice, it's rare for a client to process multiple message edit
events at the same time, but this will happen anytime a client is
offline for a few minutes during which several edits occur.
Dinesh
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
jai2201
Tim Abbott
evykassirer
Rishabh-792
Biki-das
Mateusz Mandera
Zixuan James Li
Riken Shah
Adam Sah
Kartik Srivastava