To see this bug, you need to trigger a multi-line
error message, like sending to stream 'asdfkljasdkfjasdfa'.
(imported from commit 11ea901ae491cd2cc4e0699888074fb71db46a21)
Previously we did the equivalent of a $('.message_comp').child('input'),
which does not search beyond the first level.
In addition, using a comma in a selector is essentially an AND, which
means the narrow search only applied to elements of the 'input' class.
So when debugging we saw a bunch of elements being selected and that hid
the bug for a bit.
Now we do a .find instead which will ensure we blur the correct
elements.
This closes trac #1045.
(imported from commit f44383ee9fc93406d031589ef914f5a003334ea7)
This now adds you to a special `tutorial-username` when you begin,
we send tutorial messages there, and we remove you from it when
you're done.
(imported from commit a93a90b9347a4f72536e96331ddfd1d47727ce71)
But only allow them to send to tutorial-<<your username>>.
The idea being that this helps reduce potential abuse from this JSON
call. (Because otherwise, anyone could call into this endpoint and
have the tutorial bot send random messages to random peoples's
streams.)
(imported from commit 471d4348d7ad43858b5df240e4f1dceba006aab6)
This cuts about 6 seconds off of the test startup time on my laptop.
The other startup costs are about 1 second for the server to come up
and about half a second for casperjs to begin executing tests.
generate-fixtures now takes a '--force' option that can be use to
force a regeneration of the test database.
(imported from commit 1f473507502f0edf159b2638abb392d9357eb46f)
Prior to this commit, at 800px, e.g., the Google button
is smushed into the login form.
(imported from commit 422d1b677439460785f6b31ea2fe2c819e23e259)
Previously, we blurred all input/text boxes, including e.g. the search
box. This probably won't impact normal operation, but this can be a
problem for our automated frontend tests which tend to have different
timing than real life.
(imported from commit ea84312bea2aae99d51b48cede0746e7a5b6e76e)
Previously, using e.g. the search box would be problematic because the
compose box closing event might fire, blurring the search box, in the
middle of whatever you were doing.
(imported from commit cc045f5a6a7b7fbf72848da14b6fcd3df39cab05)
We had a bug where if the selected message had the same subject as the
target message, but a different stream, narrowing by subject would
narrow to that subject plus the selected message's stream rather than
the target message's stream.
(imported from commit 4b196342318a06d8aeea46bf05e3d7416ecb6c5b)
Previously if you narrowed to
"pm-with:wdaher@humbughq.com,jbarnold@humbughq.com", you'd always get
no results because our filter was comparing your query against
message.reply_to, which is sorted in alphabetical order.
(imported from commit 40dc78640f3b010f11312176cfcf3c331fdf3337)
The most expensive part of adding the display time to messages is
calling time.toLocaleDateString() and time.toLocaleTimeString().
Most of the time, this information never gets seen, so we now delay
calculating it until just before the user would see it. This cuts
the time to render a chunk of messages from >1s to ~200ms.
(imported from commit 6167e7a8e1c3b4ca77471fa346292be4ffa67ec8)
Adding the display times to messages is very expensive (> 1s for 400
messages in Chrome on my machine). This commit doesn't directly
address that issue, but does mitigate its affects on scrolling speed
when rendering the next chunk of the message list. After this
commit, rendering a portion of the message list for the second time
only takes ~300ms.
(imported from commit b22badb5dcce69be297f6403b1cb40950e46376e)
Long-term we probably want to pick the render window size and
re-render threshold based on the user's window height instead of
arbitrarily.
When we re-render we probably also want to ensure that the newly
selected message appears in the same location as it would have
before the re-render.
(imported from commit f044b7f2200822e8e6e8dba7108d087a69016134)
One of Matt Goldstein's comments is that we often make you look
like you're not at your computer, even when you are, just because
you haven't checked Humbug for a while.
While it's important to have this be accurate, right now I think
we err on the side of showing you as not present. So I increased
some of the timeouts in an attempt to fix that.
(imported from commit 9fd8f432e6684ec1b33d1d932f37caa99c627959)
To incorporate the site parsing fix from a couple weeks ago.
Before deploying this to prod we need to run build-api-tarball and
deploy the code to humbughq.com as for usual API releases.
(imported from commit f6711f5cc07d174c30866029032a595ecee785a3)
This might need to change after we merge zev's message list branch, but
it fixes the bug and performs well and isn't a lot of code.
And it has the nice property that it'll only fade messages within the
neighbors range, so there's no need to update the unfading code to
support this.
(imported from commit c562d7335bc5635c960321e1451e4ba0f4452ee9)
I don't actually have this problem, but Jessica et al tell me that the
tutorial bot's messages sometimes arrive too late for them and it
interferes with the test suite's ability to run correctly.
I add a delay which should hopefully reduce the occurrence
of this issue.
(imported from commit 0f41610ada7dd49d71f0deef034e014164357197)
Even though they look like images, they're not -- you need to
append ?dl=1 to get the image version.
(imported from commit 2a05e7c58f475c908687110d9191f8709425c660)
It's not quite what the CUSTOMER4 person wanted, but
I think it scratches the itch.
This fixes Trac #1023
(imported from commit 9186499c8f6bacb230a2d1ed6d5ca7ffa7416ac3)
Tim Abbott
Waseem Daher
Luke Faraone
Zev Benjamin
Jessica McKellar