Moves `update_billing_method_of_current_plan` to the BillingSession
abstract class.
Adds a helper function for support views for the realm case:
`update_realm_billing_method`.
Moves `update_sponsorship_status` to BillingSession abstract class
as `update_customer_sponsorship_status`.
Updates the support views to have a helper for updating this on a
realm: `update_realm_sponsorship_status`.
Makes `approve_sponshorship` an abstract method in BillingSession
abstract base class and moves the implementation for realms to the
RealmBillingSession child class.
Adds `approve_realm_sponsorship` helper function that's used in
the support view and initiates the billing session.
This moves the logic for `attach_realm_discount`, which is used in
the support view, to be in the BillingSession class.
Updates the function name to be `attach_discount_to_customer` so
that the context is generalized vs realm specific.
Updates RealmBillingSession implementation to account for actions
that are initiated by a support admin user.
Also moves the helper function `get_discount_for_realm` that is
only used in support views to `corporate/lib/support.py`.
The "clicked" phrasing is not accurate, because e.g. if a user did click
their invitation link but didn't submit the registration form, the
support page will still claim about the link "has never been clicked".
"Used" is a better general phrase. If we want to track whether links
have been specifically *clicked*, we'll need to implement that
separately.
Users and confirmation objects with the type
`Confirmation.USER_REGISTRATION` or `Confirmation.INVITATION` may have
plan data associated with them but not displayed previously due to a
bug.
This fixes this issue and adds test cases to verify that the realm
details correctly displays the plan data.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This avoids monkey-patching `CustomerPlan` and other related information
onto the `Realm` object by having a separate dictionary with the realm
id as the key, each corresponds to a `PlandData` dataclass.
This is a part of the django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Two of the callers of `get_confirmations` uses a `QuerySet` of confirmation
objects instead of their ids to filter the confirmations. This refactors
`get_confirmations` so that it is typed to accept `Iterable[int]` that
is a list of ids.
It's worth noting that this might be less performant than the previous
approach since it requires more queries when we force the ids into lists
without having django creating a nested query. But the performance
is not a concern here compared to clarity.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
The database value for expiry_date is None for the invite
that will never expire and the clients send -1 as value
in the API similar to the message retention setting.
Also, when passing invite_expire_in_days as an argument
in various functions, invite_expire_in_days is passed as
-1 for "Never expires" option since invite_expire_in_days
is an optional argument in some functions and thus we cannot
pass "None" value.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
This extends the invite api endpoints to handle an extra
argument, expiration duration, which states the number of
days before the invitation link expires.
For prereg users, expiration info is attached to event
object to pass it to invite queue processor in order to
create and send confirmation link.
In case of multiuse invites, confirmation links are
created directly inside do_create_multiuse_invite_link(),
For filtering valid user invites, expiration info stored in
Confirmation object is used, which is accessed by a prereg
user using reverse generic relations.
Fixes#16359.
Moving forward we are hoping to collect data on org types from our
users, so it makes sense to display the org type on the "Counts"
tab of our /activity page.
JsonableError has two major benefits over json_error:
* It can be raised from anywhere in the codebase, rather than
being a return value, which is much more convenient for refactoring,
as one doesn't potentially need to change error handling style when
extracting a bit of view code to a function.
* It is guaranteed to contain the `code` property, which is helpful
for API consistency.
Various stragglers are not updated because JsonableError requires
subclassing in order to specify custom data or HTTP status codes.