These tests didn't configure ldap settings correctly and as a result,
the user involved in these tests wasn't actually hamlet@zulip.com, but a
new, malformed user with email "hamlet" that was being created by the
ldap auto-registration codepath. This wasn't caught because the codepath
didn't validate the email address and thus created such a malformed user
silently.
Fixes#17277.
The main limitation of this implementation is that the sync happens if
the user authing already exists. This means that a new user going
through the sign up flow will not have their custom fields synced upon
finishing it. The fields will get synced on their consecutive log in via
SAML in the future. This can be addressed in the future by moving the
syncing code further down the codepaths to login_or_register_remote_user
and plumbing the data through to the user creation process.
We detail that limitation in the documentation.
The previous hashers mirrored the ones used in production, but that was
non-ideal because those are slow. Replacing them with quick hashers is a
performance improvement for those tests.
Raising jsonableError in the authentication form was non-ideal because
it took the user to an ugly page with the returned json.
We also add logging of this rare occurence of the scenario being
handled here.
user_profile.check_password(password) in authenticate of
EmailAuthBackend can raise PasswordTooWeakError; this happens when the
user's password is weaker than the current required policies and needs
to be rehashed (E.g. because, as in Django 3.2, the minimum salt
entropy increased).
This is a very rare case, but still needs a good user-facing error
message. We raise a json error to handle this with a user-facing error
message.
See this comment by Mateusz Mandera for a detailed explanation
about this case along with a traceback it generates.
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/15449#discussion_r448308614
This allows access to be more configurable than just setting one
attribute. This can be configured by setting the setting
AUTH_LDAP_ADVANCED_REALM_ACCESS_CONTROL.
This adds the is_user_active with the appropriate code for setting the
value correctly in the future. In the following commit a migration to
backfill the value for existing Subscriptions will be added.
To ensure correct user_profile.is_active handling also in tests, we
replace all direct .is_active mutation with calls to appropriate
functions.
This adds an option for restricting a ldap user
to only be allowed to login into certain realms.
This is done by configuring an attribute mapping of "org_membership"
to an ldap attribute that will contain the list of subdomains the ldap
user is allowed to access. This is analogous to how it's done in SAML.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
The name used to be included in the id_token, but this seems to have
been changed by Apple and now it's sent in the `user` request param.
https://github.com/python-social-auth/social-core/pull/483 is the
upstream PR for this - but upstream is currently unmaintained, so we
have to monkey patch.
We also alter the tests to reflect this situation. Tests no longer put
the name in the id_token, but rather in the `user` request param in the
browser flow, just like it happens in reality.
An adaptation has to be made in the native flow - since the name won't
be included by Apple in the id_token anymore, the app, when POSTing
to the /complete/apple/ endpoint,
can (and should for better user experience)
add the `user` param formatted as json of
{"email": "hamlet@zulip.com", "name": {"firstName": "Full", "lastName": "Name"}}
dict. This is also reflected by the change in the
native flow tests.
A later commit alters `authenticate` of EmailAuthBackend to
add a store `needs_to_change_password` variable to session
which is useful to insist users on changing their weak password.
The tests start failing with that change because client.login()
runs `authenticate` without a `request` object. So, this commit
sends a request object with `request.session=self.client.session`
to self.client.login() in tests wherever needed.
We previously used to to redirect to config error page with
a different URL. This commit renders config error in the same
URL where configuration error is encountered. This way when
conifguration error is fixed the user can refresh to continue
normally or go back to login page from the link provided to
choose any other backend auth.
Also moved those URLs to dev_urls.py so that they can be easily
accessed to work on styling etc.
In tests, removed some of the asserts checking status code to be 200
as the function `assert_in_success_response` does that check.
Replace default root logger with zulip.auth.apple for apple auth
in file zproject/backends.py and update the test cases
accordingly in file zerver/tests/test_auth_backends.py
Replaced mock.patch with assertLogs for testing log outputs
in file test_auth_backends.py.
This change requires adjusting
test_log_into_subdomain_when_email_is_none to use an explicit token
since that appears in the log output.
There are three functional side effects:
• Correct an insignificant but mathematically offensive bias toward
repeated characters in generate_api_key introduced in commit
47b4283c4b4c70ecde4d3c8de871c90ee2506d87; its entropy is increased
from 190.52864 bits to 190.53428 bits.
• Use the base32 alphabet in confirmation.models.generate_key; its
entropy is reduced from 124.07820 bits to the documented 120 bits, but
now it uses 1 syscall instead of 24.
• Use the base32 alphabet in get_bigbluebutton_url; its entropy is
reduced from 51.69925 bits to 50 bits, but now it uses 1 syscall
instead of 10.
(The base32 alphabet is A-Z 2-7. We could probably replace all of
these with plain secrets.token_urlsafe, since I expect most callers
can handle the full urlsafe_b64 alphabet A-Z a-z 0-9 - _ without
problems.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Our intent throughout the codebase is to treat email
case-insensitively.
The only codepath affected by this bug is remote_user_sso, as that's the
only one that currently passes potentially both a user_profile and
ExternalAuthDataDict when creating the ExternalAuthResult. That's why we
add a test specifically for that codepath.
Mateusz Mandera
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Anders Kaseorg
Dinesh
strifel
Riken Shah
shanukun
Strifel
Tim Abbott
sushant52
palash