This commit adds support to add subgroups to a group while
creating it.
User can add the subgroups to group irrespective of permissions
like user can add members during creating it.
This commit updates code to allow users with permission
to add members to add subgroups as well. And only users
with permission to manage the group can remove subgroups.
Also updated tests to check permissions in separate tests
and removed them from the existing test.
Removed `move_messages_between_streams_policy` property, as the permission
to move messages between channels is now controlled by
`can_move_messages_between_channels_group` setting.
Users with permission to manage the group have all the permissions
including joining/leaving the group, adding others group which also
have a separate setting to control them.
So, it makes sense to just check managing permissions first in
access_user_group_for_update and then check the specific permission.
There is no behavioral change in this commit, it only changes the
order of checking permissions.
We want to allow the user, who can add others to group, to
join the group as well irrespective of can_join_group setting.
Previously, the permission to add others (or say anyone) was
controlled by can_manage_group setting, but now it is controlled
by can_add_members_group setting. This commit fixes the code to
use can_add_members_group setting to check permission for joining
the group.
This commit also improves the tests for checking permission to
join the group such that different settings are tested in isolation.
Fixes ##31935.
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_change can't be durable as it's
invoked within `sync_ldap_user_data`, which is already in
transaction.atomic.
This change requires a few additional tweaks to untangle other related
transactions. The top level view functions up the codepath now use
durable=True. check_remove_custom_profile_field_value is called inside
do_update_user, so it no longer can be durable and should be switched to
savepoint=False. In turn, its remaining caller - the view
remove_user_custom_profile_data - gets switched to durable=True.
Fixes a spurious error that’s logged and ignored during the Puppeteer
tests, introduced by commit eef65d7e30
(#31438).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Removing members will be controlled by `can_manage_group` until we add
`can_remove_members_group` in the future.
Users with permission to manage a group can add members to that group by
default without being present in `can_add_members_group`.
Earlier, only public data export was possible via `POST /export/realm`
endpoint. This commit adds support to create full data export with
member consent via that endpoint.
Also, this adds a 'export_type' parameter to the dictionaries
in `realm_export` event type and `GET /export/realm` response.
Fixes part of #31201.
This commit updates backend code to not allow adding deactivated
users to groups including when creating groups and also to not
allow removing deactivated users from groups.
Added `result_` prefix to differentiate it from upcoming `message_ids`
parameter to the API request. Also, this is final `message_ids` that
we will fetch the messages for. So, a `result` prefix makes sense here.
Earlier, we used to store the key data related to realm exports
in RealmAuditLog. This commit adds a separate table to store
those data.
It includes the code to migrate the concerned existing data in
RealmAuditLog to RealmExport.
Fixes part of #31201.
These files are necessary for the protocol to verify that the file
upload was completed successfully. Rather than delete them, we update
their StorageClass if it is non-STANDARD.
This commit does not add the logic of using this setting to actually
check the permission on the backend. That will be done in a later
commit.
Only owners can modify this setting, but we will add that logic in a
later commit in order to keep changes in this commit minimal.
Adding the setting breaks the frontend, since the frontend tries to find
a dropdown widget for the setting automatically. To avoid this, we've
added a small temporary if statement to `settings_org.js`.
Although, most lists where we insert this setting follow an unofficial
alphabetical order, `can_manage_all_groups` has been bunched together
with `can_create_groups` since keeping those similar settings together
would be nicer when checking any code related to creating/managing a
user group.
We might introduce a generic testing function similar to
do_test_changing_settings_by_owners_only later, but not right now, since
there is only 1 setting at the moment needing that test.
This commit does not add the logic of using this setting to actually
check the permission on the backend. That will be done in a later
commit.
Adding the setting breaks the frontend, since the frontend tries to find
a dropdown widget for the setting automatically. To avoid this, we've
added a small temporary if statement to `settings_org.js`.
This commit adds access_user_group_to_read_membership function
so that we can avoid calling get_user_group_by_id_in_realm with
"for_read=True" from views functions, which is better for security
since that function does not do any access checks.
This commit refactors the code to check permission for
accessing user group in such a way that we can avoid
duplicate code in future when we will have different
settings controlling the permissions for editing group
details and settings, joining the group, adding others
to group, etc.
The Content-Type, Content-Disposition, StorageClass, and general
metadata are not set according to our patterns by tusd; copy the file
to itself to update those properties.
Setting `ResponseContentDisposition=attachment` means that we override
the stored `ContentDisposition`, which includes a filename. This
means that using the "Download" link on servers with S3 storage
produced a file named the sanitized version we stored.
Explicitly build a `ContentDisposition` to tell S3 to return, which
includes both `attachment` as well as the filename (if we have it
locally).
This new property allows organization administrators to specify whether
users can modify the custom profile field value on their own account.
This property is configurable for individual fields.
By default, existing and newly created fields have this property set to
true, that is, they allow users to edit the value of the fields.
Fixes part of #22883.
Co-Authored-By: Ujjawal Modi <umodi2003@gmail.com>
Adds a check for changing an existing guest user's role before
calling do_update_user in the case that a realm has a current
paid plan with manual license management.
Aside of what's generally explained in the code comment, this is
motivated by the specific situation of import of Slack Connect channels.
These channels contain users who are "external collaborators" and
limited to a single channel in Slack. We don't have more sophisticated
handling of their import, which would map this concept 1-to-1 in Zulip -
but we create them as inactive dummy users, meaning they have to go
through signup before their account is usable.
The issue is that their imported UserProfile.role is set to Member and
when they register, the UserProfile gets reactivated with that role
unchanged. However, if e.g. the user is signing up after they received
an invitation from the admin, they should get the role that was
configured on the invite. In particular important if the user is meant
to still be "limited" and thus the admin invites them as a guest - they
definitely don't want the user to get a full Member account because of
this weird interaction between import and registration.
Sahil Batra
Vector73
Harsh
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Shubham Padia
Anders Kaseorg
Prakhar Pratyush
Aman Agrawal
Alex Vandiver
tnmkr
Lauryn Menard