GIF files can be `.GIF`, and also we determine the file format by
inspecting the image data, so there's no reason to have this
assertion.
(The code for serving still images does not rely on the file being a
GIF.)
Have kept process_new_human_user out of
the atomic block because it involves many
different operations and also sends events.
Tried enclosing event in on_commit but that
would need many changes in the tests, so have
skipped it for now.
Updates testing helpers in `event_schema.py` for `do_update_message` so
that all stream message fields are present in any edits / updates to
stream messages. Adds verfication tests of events returned from private
message edits and from stream message content-only and topic-only edits.
Updates the `update_message` event type to always include a `stream_id`
field when the message being edited is a stream message. This change
aligns with the current definition of the `\get-events` endpoint
in the OpenAPI documentation.
It is better to press on, than stop halfway through due to a user
whose email no longer works. The exception is already logged, which
is sufficient here, as this is generally run interactively.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
While races here are unlikely, it is most correct to enforce this
invariant at the database layer, and having a database-level
constraint makes the models file a bit more readable.
These are not considered to be "personal"
info, even if you upload them, so we
don't export them.
Generally the only folks who upload
these are admins, who can easily get
them in other ways. In fact, anybody
can get these via the app.
We now ensure that all message ids are sorted BEFORE
we split them into batches.
We now do a few extra "slim" queries to get message
ids up front.
But, now, when we divide them into batches, we no
longer run 2 or 3 different complicated queries in
a loop. We just basically hydrate our message ids,
so `write_message_partials` should be easy to reason
about.
This change also means that for tiny realms with
< 1000 messages you will always have just one
json file, since we aggregate the ids from the
queries before batching.
This accomplishes a few things:
* It extracts `chunkify` rather than having us
clumsily track chunking-related stuff in a
big loop that is doing other stuff.
* It makes it so that all message ids
in message-000001.json < message-000002.json.
* It makes it easier for us to customize
the messages we send to a single user
(coming soon).
BTW we probably have a slicker version of chunkify
somewhere in our codebase, but I couldn't remember
where.
Now all file writes go through our three
helper functions, and we consistently
write a single log message after the file
gets written.
I killed off write_message_exports, since
all but one of its callers can call
write_table_data, which automatically
sorts data. In particular, our Message
and UserMessage data will now be sorted
by ids.
This probably just postpones the list creation until
Django builds the "IN" query, but semantically it's
good to work in sets where we don't have any
meaningful ordering of the list that gets used.
The immediate benefit of this is stronger mypy
checks (avoiding the ugly union caused by message
files).
The subsequent commit will add sorting.
We have test coverage on all these lines insofar
as if you comment out the lines, tests will
explode (i.e. more than superficial line
coverage).
The distinction here wasn't super meaningful
due to the way we order our "elif" statements,
but we want to reserver "normal_parent" for the
majority of use cases, where you simply tell
the Config what the "foreign_key" is.
For realm-wide exports, there is no reason to query
inefficiently against a list of modified users.
We move the Config out of the common child configs.
Even though Django usually treats foo__in
and foo_id__in identically for filters where
foo is a ForeignKey type, we want to insist
on somewhat more consistent syntax, because
we have the odd combo of type and type_id
in Recipient, where type_id is kinda like a
foreign key, but not a ForeignKey.
So we assert for now that all our include_rows
values end in "_id__in".
Anders Kaseorg
Shlok Patel
Tim Abbott
Sahil Batra
Lauryn Menard
Alex Vandiver
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
odunybrad