Commit 03393631bd (#14142) regressed the
keyboard accessibility of the keyboard shortcuts modal. Fix it by
moving tabindex="0" to the scrolling element of the SimpleBar.
Fixes#14320.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We stopped needing this with
0329b67048
(Dec 2016).
The function sets `bot.can_admin`,
which was only used in `bot_data.get_editable`.
We removed two tests (and then put back
some test setup that needed to leak down
to the last test).
This is code simplification motivated
by a recent bug that we fixed with some
server changes, but which was really
caused in some sense by our client code
using an overly finicky
condition to check falsiness.
For cross-realm bots, the value of
`user.bot_owner_id` may be `null`, or it
may simply be `undefined`, depending
on whether the server passes `None`
or simply omits the field.
We don't want out client code to be
coupled to that rather arbitrary
decision.
We were doing a `!== null` check instead
of checking for falsiness, which led to
blueslip errors in the past. Because a
bot owner id could be plausibly 0, a falsiness
check would be brittle in a different way.
Now we avoid that ugliness by calling
`get_bot_owner_user`, which either returns
an object or `undefined`.
And then the caller can just do a concise
check for whether `bot_owner` exists.
And we also fix up the crufty code that
was putting `bot_owner_full_name` on to
the object instead of using a local.
We have a bug report for this again, although
it might be on an old branch.
Fixes#13621.
This allows us to block use of the desktop app with insecure versions
(we simply fail to load the Zulip webapp at all, instead rendering an
error page).
For now we block only versions that are known to be both insecure and
not auto-updating, but we can easily adjust these parameters in the
future.
We know that by default the value of `enable_stream_push_notifications` is
true, so on some server if push notifications are disabled then due to
```
{{#unless show_push_notifications_tooltip}}
```
the `enable_stream_push_notifications` checkbox is rendered as unchecked
and when we update any other setting in the "Stream notifications" section,
due to `settings_notifications.update_page()` all checkboxes are changed to
current values which means above checkbox get checked.
We can deal with this bug either making changes in
`settings_notifications.update_page()` but we should show check/uncheck
state of checkboxes anyway so removing this `unless` condition fixes this
bug.
Instead of having logical expressions in templates, it's always preferred
to calculating them in javascript and pass the results as a context. It
also enhances the readability of templates and testing of such logic is
easier in js over templates.
`all_notification_settings_labels` is misleading that this variable is a
list of notifications setting labels so changed it to
`all_notification_settings`.
The reason for extracting this function is that getting the text, integer,
boolean value from the input elements (like checkboxes, dropdowns) is a
common task, and later we can use this function to get the input element
value in `settings_notifications` in the upcoming commit.
This is a bug fix where, if a list_render
object with the given name exists and it's items
have been sorted, then the filtered_list's data
does not get updated on re-rendering.
This line was present in the original commit
9576d5caef.
The use case for this are small or fixed tables, which do not need
filtering support. Thus we are able to not include the unnecessary
search input inside the html parent container.
It is not used at present, but will be required when we refactor
the settings pages.
We also split out exports.validate_filter function for
unit testing the above condition.
As a consequence of too many options in the bottom `Other permissions`
subsection, the `Save` button could end up too far up from the bottom,
such that it might appear offscreen on low-height laptops.
We fix this by reorganizing the settings in a way that is both more
intuitive and also ensures that none of the subsections are too tall.
Fixes: #14274.
Before this commit, the reactions code would
take the `message.reactions` structure from
the server and try to "collapse" all the reactions
for the same users into the same reactions,
but with each reaction having a list of user_ids.
It was a strangely denormalized structure that
was awkward to work with, and it made it really
hard to reason about whether the data was in
the original structure that the server sent or
the modified structure.
Now we use a cleaner, normalized Map to keep
each reaction (i.e. one per emoji), and we
write that to `message.clean_reactions`.
The `clean_reactions` structure is now the
authoritatize source for all reaction-related
operations. As soon as you try to do anything
with reactions, we build the `clean_reactions`
data on the fly from the server data.
In particular, when we process events, we just
directly manipulate the `clean_reactions` data,
which is much easier to work with, since it's
a Map and doesn't duplicate any data.
This rewrite should avoid some obscure bugs.
I use `r` as shorthand for the clean reaction
structures, so as not to confuse it with
data from the server's message.reactions.
It also avoids some confusion where we use
`reaction` as a var name for the reaction
elements.
We've often gotten the complaint that Zulip's emoji are a bit too big;
this should address the worst consequences of that (line-wrapping
being off with large emoji present) while still making it possible to
easily see what a given emoji is.
The right place to change this is in rendered_markdown.scss, not the
main emoji definition in zulip.scss, as the latter is also used in
places like the emoji picker where a larger size is valuable.
Closes#12731, an older PR that did this with slightly different
parameters (and without a comment).
Fixes#14254
You can test this on dev:
* do "-stream:Verona" in the search bar (the minus
sign negates the search here)
* reload the browser
You should see the same search (all streams besides Verona).
We simplify the code for deciding whether
we show a subscribe button or not, and in
doing so avoid a blueslip error where we
were passing `undefined` into `get_sub()`.
We had this API:
people.add_in_realm = full-fledged user
people.add = not necessarily in realm
Now the API is this:
people.add = full-fledged user
people._add_user = internal API for cross-realm bots
and deactivated users
I think in most of our tests the distinction between
people.add() and people.add_in_realm() was just an
accident of history and didn't reflect any real intention.
And if I had to guess the intention in 99% of the cases,
folks probably thought they were just creating ordinary,
active users in the current realm.
In places where the distinction was obviously important
(because a test failed), I deactivated the user via
`people.deactivate`.
For the 'basics' test in the people test suite, I clean
up the test setup for Isaac. Before this commit I was
adding him first as a non-realm user then as a full-fledged
user, but this was contrived and confusing, and we
didn't really need it for test coverage purposes.
We want to move more logic to stream_data to facilitate
testing.
Both before and after this commit, we essentially build a
new list of users for typeahead, but now the new list
excludes subscribed users. We can do even better than
this in a follow-up commit.
Before this commit, presence used get_realm_count()
to determine whether a realm was "small" (and thus
should show all human users in the buddy list, even
humans that had not been active in a while).
The `get_realm_count` function--despite a very wrong,
misleading comment--was including bots in its count.
The new function truly counts only active humans
(and no bots).
Because we were overcounting users before this change,
we should technically adjust `BIG_REALM_COUNT` down
by some amount to reflect our original intention there
on the parameter. I'm leaving it alone for now, though,
since we've improved the performance of the buddy list
over time, and it's probably fine if a few "big" realms
get re-classified as small realms (and show more users)
by virtue of this change.
(Also note that this cutoff value only affects the
"normal" view of the buddy list; both small realms
and large realms will show long-inactive users if you
do searches.)
Fixes#14215