compute_plan_parameters assumed that the value of
tier is always CustomerPlan.STANDARD. We change that behavior
to make the function handle CustomerPlan.PLUS as well.
This upgrades the Stripe API to the most recent version. Going through
the Git history, it looks like our current API version is at 2019-03-14.
The API version should be manually changed in Stripe dashboard at the same
time as the commit is deployed in production.
Backward incompatible changes that are relevant to our codebase between
(2019-03-14, 2020-08-27].
* 2020-08-27 - The `sources` property on Customers is no longer included by
default.
* 2020-03-02 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-12-03 - The `id` field of all invoice line items have changed and are
now prefixed
with `il_`. We only rely on this while we normalize the fixtures.
* 2019-11-05 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-10-17 - The `billing` attribute on invoices, subscriptions, and
subscription schedules is renamed to`collection_method`. The invoice
change is the one that is relevant to us.
* The customer object’s `account_balance` value has been renamed to
`balance`. Only used for the stubs at the moment.
* 2019-10-08 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-09-09 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-08-14 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-05-16 - Nothing applicable
https://stripe.com/docs/upgrades
Also normalize the following IDs in stripe fixtures
* price_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* prod_[A-Za-z0-9]{14}
* pi_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* il_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
Previously, we only downgraded and voided small organizations behind
payments only if they had an active plan.
This left us with a bunch of invoices from small realms which used to
have an active plan. It doesn't make much sense for us to get these
realms to pay the invoices so we have decided to just void them. This
commit voids the open invoices of all the small realms without an active
plan and has the last invoice open. Unlike, the realms with an active
plan we don't email them about us voiding the invoice. It's not super
obvious whether Stripe sends an email to the customer when the Invoice
is voided. But they do get the message that the invoice is voided if
they try to pay the invoice through the hosted invoice page.
An additional check for whether customer.stripe_customer_id is
None is added to the function. That check was not really required before
since all the customers with a plan also have a valid value for
stripe_customer_id. So all the calls to stripe.Invoice.list would have
non None value for customer argument.
Even though that is the case, mypy should still have complained about
the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id being None when passed to
stripe.Invoice.list as customer paramater since mypy don't know that
customers with a plan will always have a non empty value for
stripe_customer_id. Our stripe stubs expect a non empty value for
the customer parameter of stripe.Invoice.list. This is despite the
fact that stripe.Invoice.list can actually be called with customer set
to None. This returns the invoices from the entire organization.
Though, we still decided to ensure that the value of customer should be
non empty since there is no reason for us to ever call this function
with customer set to None. You can just call the function wuthout the
customer argument instead. So this requirement of a non None customer
paramater is useful for catching bugs.
The reason mypy didn't complain was because the type of
Customer.objects.all() is Any and not QuerySet[Customer]. So mypy has no
idea that customer.stripe_customer_id can be theoratically None even
though it was not possible in this [articular case as explained before.
I verified that this was the reason mypy didn't complain by using the
reveal_type function on Customer.objects.all() and the customer object.
After the refactoring it's super to obvious to mypy that the type of the
customer is Customer since it's mentioned in the function defintion. So it
was able to complain about the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id
being None after the refactoring.
An organization with at most 5 users that is behind on payments isn't
worth spending time on investigating the situation.
For larger organizations, we likely want somewhat different logic that
at least does not void invoices.
stripe.Invoice.list by default would only get 10 invoices at a
time. So a function like this would be really handy if we have
to go through a lot of invoices.
This also means void_all_open_invoices used to void only the last
10 invoices. The main reason we implemented this function was to
void the invoices generated by realms on free trial so I don't
think there were cases where we had to void realms with more than
10 invoices.
This also fixes a bug in void_all_open_invoices function. If a realm
with a local Customer object but without an associated stripe.Customer
is passed to void_all_open_invoices, then the function will end up
voiding the last 10 invoices created by billing system instead of voiding
no invoices at all. This is because stripe.Invoice.list(customer=None)
return last 10 invoices across all customers.
But this bug won't cauuse any issue in production since
void_all_open_invoices can be only invoked from /support page. And we
show the option to void invoices in support page only if the realm
has a paid plan. And it's not really possible for a realm to have
a paid plan without having an associated stripe_customer_id. Plus I
went through the void events in stripe stream since the PR to add
void invoices was merged and there does not seems to be any suspicious
events.
django.utils.translation.ugettext is a deprecated alias of
django.utils.translation.gettext as of Django 3.0, and will be removed
in Django 4.0.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Vishnu KS
Eeshan Garg
PIG208
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Siddharth Asthana