Adds links to the documentation about management commands in the
API documentation for creating users, as well as the `/devtools`
documentation, the GDPR compliance article and the incoming
webhooks tutorial.
Adds HTML title elements to templates that extend either `base.html`,
`portico.html` or `portico_signup.html`, and that are not website
portico landing pages that will use the `PAGE_TITLE` variable to set
the HTML title element (see following commit in series).
Also, updates some templates for missing translation tags.
As a general rule, we want the title element (and page content)
translated. Exceptions that are updated in this commit are templates
used in the development environment, analytics templates that are used
by staff and templates related to Zephyr.
I rewrote most of tools/lib/pretty-printer.py, which
was fairly easy due to being able to crib some
important details from the previous implementation.
The main motivation for the rewrite was that we weren't
handling else/elif blocks correctly, and it was difficult
to modify the previous code. The else/elif shortcomings
were somewhat historical in nature--the original parser
didn't recognize them (since they weren't in any Zulip
templates at the time), and then the pretty printer was
mostly able to hack around that due to the "nudge"
strategy. Eventually the nudge strategy became too
brittle.
The "nudge" strategy was that we would mostly trust
the existing templates, and we would just nudge over
some lines in cases of obviously faulty indentation.
Now we are bit more opinionated and rigorous, and
we basically set the indentation explicitly for any
line that is not in a code/script block. This leads
to this diff touching several templates for mostly
minor fix-ups.
We aren't completely opinionated, as we respect the
author's line wrapping decisions in many cases, and
we also allow authors not to indent blocks within
the template language's block constructs.
This reverses the policy that was set, but incompletely enforced, by
commit 951514dd7d. The self-closing tag
syntax is clearer, more consistent, simpler to parse, compatible with
XML, preferred by Prettier, and (most importantly now) required by
FormatJS.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>