This code was very useful when first implemented to help catch errors
where our backend templates didn't render, but has been superceded by
the success of our URL coverage testing (which ensures every URL
supported by Zulip's urls.py is accessed by our tests, with a few
exceptions) and other tests covering all of the emails Zulip sends.
It has a significant maintenance cost because it's a bit hacky and
involves generating fake context, so it makes sense to remove these.
Any future coverage issues with templates should be addressed with a
direct test that just accessing the relevant URL or sends the relevant
email.
We currently have code to calculate the value of realm_icon_url,
admin_emails and default_discount in two diffrent places. With
the addition of showing confirmation links it would become three.
The easiest way to deduplicate the code and make the view cleaner
is by doing the calculations in template. Alternatively one can
write a function that takes users, realms and confirmations as
arguments and sets the value of realm_icon_url, admin_emails and
default_discount appropriately in realm object according to the
type of the confirmation. But that seems more messy than passing
the functions directly to template approach.
For the emails that are associated to an existing account in an
organisation, the avatars will be displayed in the email selection
page. This includes avatar data in what is passed to the page.
Added `avatar_urls` to the context in `test_templates.py`.
As of commit 8c199fd44c (#12667) this
file is no longer generated. Handlebars compile errors are raised as
webpack errors.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This reverts commit f476ec7fac (#10312)
and replaces it with a proper fix using Jinja2 raw blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
If MAX_FILE_UPLOAD_SIZE is set to 0, then UI elements like the upload
icon in the compose and message edit UI and "Attachments" menu in
"/#settings" are not displayed.
A different error message is also displayed if a user tries to drag and
drop or paste a file into the compose message box.
Fixes#12152.
This changes the border-radius to 6px for the tabbed display, which is not
in line with the current Zulip style for border-radius (4px). However 6px
really looks a lot better for this (possibly because it's a bigger box than
most of our other boxes?)
This reverts the temporary fix done in commit
46f4e58782 and replaced it with the fix that
non-admins should be able to see a dropdown to select a non-admin type of
invited user i.e. normal member or guest user.
This commit adds a custom Markdown include extension which is
identical to the original except when a macro file can't
be found, it raises a custom JsonableError exception, which
we can catch and then trigger an appropriate test failure.
Fixes: #10947
Apparently, when we renamed these files to no longer have a .txt
extension, we accidentally removed them from the set of strings for
translation, because `manage.py makemessages` by default only
processes .txt and .html files under the templates/ directory.
Fix this by adding a .txt extension.
We've been getting reports from users that our Freshdesk webhook
isn't working correctly. It turns out that the issue had nothing
to do with the webhook implementation itself!
In freshdesk/doc.md, we have a JSON template we ask users to
copy/paste into a textbox in the Freshdesk UI. That JSON template
contains "{{" and "}}" characters which we escaped as Unicode
decimals to prevent clashes with Jinja2 syntax in other parts
of the same template. This worked for a while!
But thanks to the changes introduced as part of the
nested_code_blocks extension, such escaped characters were never
decoded, leading users to copy/paste the same template but with
raw escaped unicode representations of "{{" and "}}" inside. And
that eventually broke our webhook implementation.
This commit makes sure that such characters are properly "unescaped",
just for Freshdesk docs.
In certain cases we have to load a template directly because it
isn't in Jinja2's recognized template directories. This commit
adds a test to make sure that absolute paths are recognized
if they are pure Markdown files.
This commit adds a Markdown tree-processor extension that renders
multi-line code blocks that are nested inside lists with the
formatting. Note that the code block could be nested inside multiple
list levels and would still get rendered correctly.
Tim: This fixes the need for unpleasant workarounds like
f5bfa4e793 and makes nested code blocks
in our documentation look exactly how users would expect them to.
The only changes visible at the AST level, checked using
https://github.com/asottile/astpretty, are
zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py:
'\x1b\\[(1|0)m' ↦ '\\x1b\\[(1|0)m'
'\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\n' ↦ '\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\\n'
which is fine because re treats '\\x1b' and '\\n' the same way as
'\x1b' and '\n'.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
In templates/zerver/api/main.html, since the current context isn't
passed to render_markdown_path when rendering an article,
render_markdown_path doesn't have the context to render values such
as api_url. This commit makes sure that it does by passing a dict
called api_uri_context to render_markdown_path when rendering an
article.
This commit implements support for copying over static files
for all bots in the zulip_bots package to
static/generated/bots/ during provisioning. This directory
isn't tracked by Git. This allows us to have access to files
stored in an arbitrary zulip_bots package directory somewhere
on the system. For now, logo.* and doc.md files are copied over.
This commit should act as a starting point for extending our
macro-based Markdown framework to our bots/API packages'
documentation and eventually rendering these static files
alongside our webhooks' documentation.
The MitUser table was removed in df525ad.
confirm_mituser.html could have been accessed through the last few lines of
confirmation/views.py:
templates.insert(0, 'confirmation/confirm_%s.html'
% (obj._meta.model_name,))
The commit message on df525ad suggests there was another way
confirm_mituser.html could have been called, but I don't currently see
evidence for it in the code.
This makes it possible for Zulip administrators to delete messages.
This is primarily intended for use in deleting early test messages,
but it can solve other problems as well.
Later we'll want to play with the permissions model for this, but for
now, the goal is just to integrate the feature.
Note that it saves the deleted messages for some time using the same
approach as Zulip's message retention policy feature.
Fixes#135.