This commit adds code to not show typing notifications for inaccessible
users as the user would not have any information even if we show them
as the name shown would be "Unknown user".
Inaccessible user names are shown as "Unknown user" in the
reacted users list and tooltip.
This commit removes the call to `is_known_user_id` since we
may have reactions data from inaccessible users. And it is
fine to remove the `is_known_user_id` call anyways, because
it was added to ignore showing reactions from deactivated
users when the client did not have data about them, but now
the client has data about deactivated users.
So we anyways do not expect unknown user IDs in cases
other than inaccessible users for which we have to show
the reactions by showing their name as "Unknown user".
This commit also updates the comment for "is_known_user_id"
function accordingly.
We do not update the name for mention pills of inaccessible users
and keep it same as it was in the message content, and we show
the "Unknown user" popover on clicking the pill.
This commit sets the client capability value to not pass
unknown users data in the webapp and also does some changes
to avoid errors while loading the web-app home page.
This commit only does some basic webapp changes to not show
inaccessible users in sidebar and we would need need more
changes to make the web-app work as expected which will be
done in further commits.
The "User groups" panel is now removed from settings overlay
and we instead use new "#groups" UI.
This commit also makes some changes to tests to ensure coverage
for pill_typeahead.js which was previously done by
settings_user_group_legacy.test.js. We have still not got
complete coverage on user_pill.ts as we have removed
settings_user_group_legacy.test.js, but we just add the file
to EXEMPT_FILS list for now and will handle it in future.
Fixes#28012.
Earlier, the event sent when an onboarding step (hotspot till now)
is marked as read generated an event with type='hotspots' and
'hotspots' named array in it.
This commit renames the type to 'onboarding_steps' and the array
to 'onboarding_steps' to reflect the fact that it'll also contain
data for elements other than hotspots.
We have already fixed the actual bugs that were resulting in client
receiving presence data for unknown user, so we can remove the
blueslip logging and just skip the unknown users.
To extend the drag and drop upload area to blank areas after sidebars,
we now detect the drag/drop event on the entire ".app" division.
We also change replace `width` and `height` css properties with
`min-width` and `min-height` properties respectively, to make sure
that the ".app" div spans the entire width and height of the viewport.
Fixes: #27550.
When a user is replying to a message while in a search view, we now warn
them that the full conversation is not visible and urge them to go to
the conversation they are composing to, so they can see the complete
conversation. On narrowing to that conversation, the banner is removed.
Fixes: #25893.
This fixes a very rare exception seen in production, which the
previous assertion allowed us to understand was possible in a rare
race, now documented in comments.
Earlier, when a topic had less than 15 participants,
the @-topic typeahead was not visible. It should be visible
irrespective of the 'realm_wildcard_mention_policy' setting
when the participant count is not greater than 15.
The participant count for a topic can't always be calculated
accurately in the client as some of the messages might still
be loading.
We show @-topic in the typeahead whenever it might be possible
to use it.
We will give an error later if you aren't allowed to use it.
Fixes#27852.
This prep commit renames:
* 'stream_wildcard_mention_allowed_in_large_stream' to
'wildcard_mention_policy_authorizes_user' because the function
checks if the sender is allowed to use wildcard mentions based
on the 'wildcard_mention_policy' setting, and we plan to use that
for topic wildcard mentions too.
* 'stream_wildcard_mention_large_stream_threshold' to
'wildcard_mention_threshold' because this value is going to be
used as a threshold value for the max number of subscribers and
participant count allowed for stream and topic wildcard mention
respectively.
Earlier, for the desktop notifications having latex math
like "$$1 \oplus 0 = 1$$, the notification had the math
included multiple times.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior by replacing
the KaTeX with the raw LaTeX source.
Fixes#25289.
This commit introduces non-intro hotspots.
They are a bit different than intro hotspots in the
following ways:
* All the non-intro hotspots are sent at once instead of
sending them one by one like intro hotspots.
* They only activate when a specific event occurs,
unlike intro hotspot where they activate after the
previous hotspot is read.
Rules followed:
1. Bold and highlighted background if the mention was processed
as a mention that includes you.
2. Bold personal mention (but not highlighted) if you were mentioned
but not subscribed at the time.
3. Otherwise not bold, no highlighting.
As we plan to keep the mention pill CSS the same if a user
was mentioned via that personal/wildcard/usergroup mention
irrespective of whether the user is subscribed or not, we use
usermessage flags to determine when to add 'user-mention-me' class.
Fixes#27654.
Now, the topic wildcard mention follows the following
rules:
* If the topic has less than 15 participants , anyone
can use @ topic mentions.
* For more than 15, the org setting 'wildcard_mention_policy'
determines who can use @ topic mentions.
Earlier, topic wildcard mentions followed the same restriction
as stream wildcard mentions, which was incorrect.
Fixes part of #27700.
We simplify the banner message by replacing the
"stream wildcard mentions" text with `"@stream mentions`,
`"@-all mentions"`, or `"@-everyone mentions"` text.
This commit updates the backend code to allow changing
can_access_all_users_group setting in development environment
and also adds a dropdown in webapp UI which is only shown in
development environment.
When toggling off link formatting, it is assumed that the description
does not contain [ and ] characters, and the url does not contain ( and
) characters.
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
Note that toggling off spoiler formatting works if either all the
content inside, or the header (if it exists) or both are selected.
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
Note that toggling off, only works for code blocks without a specified
language. So toggling formatting off only works for code blocks like:
```
code
```
and not:
```javascript
code
```
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
We don't show emoji icon on message on width range even if the
logged in user is not the sender, which causes popover to not
be displayed since the reference is not visible.
To avoid such case in future, we just check if the emoji icon is
visible and if not fallback to the ellipsis icon for reference.
Until now, when a user quoted and replied to a message, even while
editing another, the quote would be inserted into the compose box. There
was no way to quote into the edit box.
Detecting the edit box to add content too was tricky, since on opening
the message actions popover, that message would be selected, while the
edit box would lose focus.
Now we don't shift focus on opening the message actions popover, keep
track of the last focused textarea and add the quote content to it if
if it's still in the DOM (if the user has not cancelled the editing).
Fixes: #20380.
Up until now, the currently selected message was the one that was always
quoted. Now if there's a message_id passed in, we'll quote that message
instead, otherwise we'll fall back on the selected message.
This is a prep commit for allowing quoting and replying while editing a
message sent earlier.
Up until now, the currently selected message was the one that was always
responded to. Now if there's a message_id passed in, we'll use that
message instead, otherwise we'll fall back to the selected message.
This is a prep commit for allowing quoting and replying while editing
a message sent earlier.
Earlier, a 'large @-mention notification' warning that pops up
for stream wildcard mentions was shown for topic wildcard mentions
too, which is incorrect.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior. We no longer show the
banner for @-topic mentions.
We don't need a banner for @-topic mentions, as those are much less
likely to be used without thinking about it and would rarely be spammy
for a lot of people.
Fixes#27767.