Doing rapid pace mark-as-unread in the Zulip web application, one
observed assertion failures showing that the server would send an
event containing multiple message IDs but only one of the messages
present in the message_details side data structure.
The cause of this was the "virtual events" compression system; two
flags/remove/read events were being combined by simply concatenating
the lists of events, without any attempt to merge the
`message_details` field on those objects.
The immediate fix is to disable virtual events compression for this
event class, but it's not unlikely we'll need to just eliminate the
virtual_events system entirely, because it seems difficult to make it
soundly handle a message whose state for a given flag changes back and
forth while the client is offline.
But we'll leave that for later, since removing that optimization
deserves more discussion than fixing this event corruption bug.
The naive solution #23465 creates situations where the same user can have
multiple reactions as the base emojis are not unique, e.g. +1::skin2
and +1::skin4 would both reduce to +1 but the userlists are separate.
This solution handles the reduction, merges the same-base reactions,
and deduplicates the userlist.
Co-authored-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: rht <rhtbot@protonmail.com>
return inside finally blocks causes exceptions to be silenced.
Although these blocks follow blanket ‘except Exception’ handlers, they
do not seem to have a goal of silencing BaseException and exceptions
thrown by the exception handler, so rewrite them to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Both of these compatibility blocks can be deleted, since you can't
upgrade directly to any supported release from the versions where the
old event formats would be used.
This solves the problem that resolving a topic with a long name (>60
characters) will cause the topic name to be truncated, and thus the edit
message code path thinks that the topic is being moved in addition to
being resolved.
We store the pre-truncation topic and use it to check against the
original topic when determining whether a topic is being moved while
getting (un)resovled or not.
Fixes#23482
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We intended to send both the "topic was resolved" and the "topic was
moved here" notification when resolving and moving a topic at the same
time in #22312.
The previous implementation did not work as expected and it was only
sending the "topic was moved here" notification.
This removes the check for old_topic and new_topic that have
RESOLVED_TOPIC_PREFIX stripped in maybe_send_resolve_notifications, so
that the notification will be sent regardless if the topic name without
the prefix stays the same or not.
Note that weird topic handling ("✔ ✔✔ some topic") in the comments
was added in e231a03eff is unaffected. In case of confusion, the lstrip
check is not essential to detecting topic being unresolved/resolved.
As we mainly have that handled in the latter part of the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
CircleCI has updated its webhook format[1] for CircleCI Cloud,
Server version 3.x and 4.x. This commit rewrites the CircleCI
integration to parse the new webhook structure. The tests have also
been rewritten for the new format.
With this commit, we support webhooks from projects that use GitHub,
BitBucket and GitLab as VCS providers. The CircleCI integration doc
has been updated to mention the same. The doc has also been updated
with the latest instructions for configuring a webhook on the CircleCI
interface, and the new output screenshots.
References:
[1]: https://circleci.com/docs/webhooks
Previously, emoji.json was read from
"$ZULIP_PATH/node_modules/emoji-datasource-google/emoji.json".
This path doesn't exist in production when installing from scratch from
a release tarball. And so, we ensure emoji.json exists by copying it to
`static/generated/emoji`.
With tweaks to comments by tabbott.
Fixes: #23469
This is a follow-up to d201229df8.
do_get_invites_controlled_by_user queries for Confirmations when finding
multiuse invites controlled by a user. This means that a revoked
multiuse invite cannot really be fetched here, because
do_revoke_multi_use_invite deletes the Confirmation object when revoking
the invitations. However, having a defensive assert here should be
useful to make this doesn't secretly break in the future if the query
used changes or if there are unexpected revoked multiuse invites with an
existing Confirmations for any (buggy) reason.
This allows us to revoke MultiUseInvites by changing their .status
instead of deleting them (which has been deleting the helpful tracking
information on PreregistrationUsers about which MultiUseInvite they came
from).
This commit adds support for Grafana's new alerting system, Grafana
Alerting. The existing Grafana integration has been modified to
detect the version of the notification through the structure of the
payload body, since the the structure varies by version. Support for
legacy alerting is been continued. Example fixtures have been added
for Grafana Alerting's webhooks.
Tests updated.
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
M@
Hari Prashant Bhimaraju
Zixuan James Li
rht
Mateusz Mandera