Expands support for the message ID operand for id" operator to be either
a string or an integer. Previously, this operand was always validated as
a string.
This is a first step toward two goals:
* support dictionary-like narrows when registering events
* use readable dataclasses internally
This is gonna be a somewhat complicated exercise due to how
events get serialized, but fortunately this interim step
doesn't require any serious shims, so it improves the codebase
even if the long-term goals may take a while to get sorted
out.
The two places where we have to use a helper to convert narrows
from tuples to dataclasses will eventually rely on their callers
to do the conversion, but I don't want to re-work the entire
codepath yet.
Note that the new NarrowTerm dataclass makes it more explicit
that the internal functions currently either don't care about
negated flags or downright don't support them. This way mypy
protects us from assuming that we can just add negated support
at the outer edges.
OTOH I do make a tiny effort here to slightly restructure
narrow_filter in a way that paves the way for negation support.
The bigger goal by far, though, is to at least support the
dictionary format.
In 2484d870b4 I created tests
using a fixture called narrow.json. I believe my intention
was to eventually use the fixture for similar tests on the
frontend, but that never happened.
Almost seven years later, I think it's time to just use
straightforward code in Python to test build_narrow_filter.
In particular, we want to move to dataclasses, so that would
create an addition nuisance for fixture-based tests. The
fixture was already annoying in terms of being an extra moving
part, being hard to read, and not being type-safe.
In order to avoid typos, I mostly code-generated the new
Python code by instrumenting the old test:
narrow_filter = build_narrow_filter(narrow)
+ print("###\n")
+ print(f"narrow_filter = build_narrow_filter({narrow})\n")
for e in accept_events:
message = e["message"]
flags = e["flags"]
@@ -610,6 +612,8 @@ class NarrowLibraryTest(ZulipTestCase):
if flags is None:
flags = []
self.assertTrue(narrow_filter(message=message, flags=flags))
+ print(f"self.assertTrue(narrow_filter(message={message}, flags={flags},))")
+ print()
for e in reject_events:
message = e["message"]
flags = e["flags"]
@@ -618,6 +622,8 @@ class NarrowLibraryTest(ZulipTestCase):
if flags is None:
flags = []
self.assertFalse(narrow_filter(message=message, flags=flags))
+ print(f"self.assertFalse(narrow_filter(message={message}, flags={flags},))")
+ print()
I then basically pasted the output in and ran black to format it.
We no longer pass in a big opaque event to narrow_filter
(which is inside build_narrow_filter). We instead explicitly
pass in message and flags. This leads to a bit more type
safety, and it's also more flexible. There's no reason to
build an entire event just to see if a message belongs to
a narrow.
The changes to the test work around the fact that the fixtures
are sloppy with types. I plan a subsequent commit to clean
up those tests significantly.
An implicit coercion from an untyped dict to the TypedDict was hiding
a type error: CapturedQuery.sql was really str, not bytes. We should
always prefer dataclass over TypedDict to prevent such errors.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
In a previous commit, the frontend of the web app was updated for
URLs with `#narrow/dm/...` for direct messages (group and 1-on-1).
Updates the URLs generated for email notifications and outgoing
webhook notification messages to use the new `/dm/...` format.
Adds backend support for `dm-including` operator. This will
deprecate the `group-pm-with` operator, but we keep support
for backwards-compatibility.
For testing updates, because the messages returned by these
two operators are different, most of the tests for `group-pm-with`
remain unchanged, but added comments about deprecated state.
Also, cleans up remaining instance of "PM" in `narrow.py` to
be "DM".
The general API changelog and documentation updates will be done
in a final commit in the series of commits that adds support for
the various new direct message narrows.
Adds backend support for `dm` operator. This will deprecate the
`pm-with` operator, but we keep support for backwards-compatibility.
For testing updates, updates the existing tests for `pm-with` to
use `dm`, and adds one basic test for `pm-with` in the `add_term`
tests as the two operators refer to the same `by_*` method.
The general API changelog and documentation updates will be done
in a final commit in the series of commits that adds support for
the various new direct message narrows.
Adds backend support for `is` operator with the `dm` operand. This
will deprecate the `is` operator with the `private` operand, but we
keep support for backwards-compatibility.
Note that there is some clean up of references to private messages
in the updated backend test. In commit 43ec7ed, the documentation
for `build_narrow_filter` wasn't updated for the rename of
`BuildNarrowFilterTest` to `NarrowLibraryTest`, so that's also
corrected in these changes.
The general API changelog and documentation updates will be done
in a final commit in the series of commits that adds support for
the various new direct message narrows.
This is a prep commit that renames 'set_topic_mutes' and
'topic_is_muted' to 'set_topic_visibility_policy' and
'topic_has_visibility_policy' respectively, and refactors
them to work with any visibility_policy, not only MUTED.
Prior to commit a9b3a9c, the server implementation for documented
search operators with dashes, also implicitly supported clients
sending those same operators with underscores. This has been the
case sense the server side support for narrow filtering was
introduced in commit 3af2bf345a.
Updates the stricter version of mapping operator strings to `by*`
functions, to also include the underscore version of any operators
that have dashes. Adds a note that these undocumented versions are
tied to the support for the documented versions.
This commits update the code to use user-level email_address_visibility
setting instead of realm-level to set or update the value of UserProfile.email
field and to send the emails to clients.
Major changes are -
- UserProfile.email field is set while creating the user according to
RealmUserDefault.email_address_visbility.
- UserProfile.email field is updated according to change in the setting.
- 'email_address_visibility' is added to person objects in user add event
and in avatar change event.
- client_gravatar can be different for different users when computing
avatar_url for messages and user objects since email available to clients
is dependent on user-level setting.
- For bots, email_address_visibility is set to EVERYONE while creating
them irrespective of realm-default value.
- Test changes are basically setting user-level setting instead of realm
setting and modifying the checks accordingly.
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line
counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still
compatible with Black 22.
(This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23
yet.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This adds CapturedQueryDict to provide a more accurate type annotation
for the return value of queries_captured. We also replace "Generator"
with "Iterator" because the latter two type parameters were unused.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
In `JsonableErrorHandler`, we convert `MissingAuthenticationError` into
a response that has `WWW-Authenticated` set for `/api` or `/json` views.
This covers and verify the value of the header for unauthenticated
access.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since `HttpResponse` is an inaccurate representation of the
monkey-patched response object returned by the Django test client, we
replace it with `_MonkeyPatchedWSGIResponse` as `TestHttpResponse`.
This replaces `HttpResponse` in zerver/tests, analytics/tests, coporate/tests,
zerver/lib/test_classes.py, and zerver/lib/test_helpers.py with
`TestHttpResponse`. Several files in zerver/tests are excluded
from this substitution.
This commit is auto-generated by a script, with manual adjustments on certain
files squashed into it.
This is a part of the django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Django caches some information on HttpRequest objects, including the
headers dict, under the assumption that requests won’t be reused.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A recent Postgres upstream release appears to have broken PGroonga.
While we wait for https://github.com/pgroonga/pgroonga/issues/203 to
be resolved, disable PGroonga in our automated tests so that Zulip
CI passes.
Although our NonClosingPool prevents the SQLAlchemy connection from
closing the underlying Django connection, we still want to properly
dispose of the associated SQLAlchemy structures.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Fixes this warning with SQLALCHEMY_WARN_20=1:
RemovedIn20Warning: The legacy calling style of select() is deprecated
and will be removed in SQLAlchemy 2.0. Please use the new calling
style described at select(). (Background on SQLAlchemy 2.0 at:
https://sqlalche.me/e/b8d9)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The target realm was not being passed to create_attachment in
upload_message_file implementations. This was a bug in the edge-case of
cross-realm messages - in particular, causing a bug in the email
gateway:
When an email with an attachment is sent, the message is mirrored to
Zulip with Email Gateway Bot as the message sender and uploader of the
attachment. Due to the realm not being passed to create_attachment, the
Attachment would get created with .realm being the system bot realm,
making the attachment inaccessible under some conditions due to failing
the following condition check (that's expected to pass, provided that
the .realm is set correctly):
```
if (
attachment.is_realm_public
and attachment.realm == user_profile.realm
and user_profile.can_access_public_streams()
):
# Any user in the realm can access realm-public files
return True
```
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.