The Helper class will soon grow, but the immediate
problem it solves is the need to jankily inspect
the parameters of our get_*_body function.
Most of the changes were handled by an ad hoc
munge.py script.
The substantive changes were adding the Helper
class and passing it in.
And then the linter discovered a place where
the optional include_title parameter wasn't used
(which is one of the reasons to avoid the janky
inspect-signature technique).
As a side note, none of the include_title parameters
needed a default value of False, as we always passed
in an explicit value.
We test cover both sides of include_title, which
you can verify by hard coding it to either True or
False (and seeing the relevant failures), although I
suspect most individual codepaths
only test one value, based on whether "topic" is in
the fixture or not.
Finally, I know Helper is not a great name, but I
intend to evolve the class a bit before deciding
whether a more descriptive name is helpful here.
(For example, an upcoming commit will add a
log_unexpected helper method.)
We get the header_event one level up the call
stack now, too.
It's somewhat annoying that we have our own
concept of "event" here, instead of just returning
our event handlers directly, or just calling them
directly, but it's a bit non-trivial to fix that
right away.
In passing, I remove the strange OR for "ping",
which is already a key in EVENT_FUNCTION_MAPPER.
See https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/16258 for
possible follow up here.
We now ignore the following two new pull_request
actions (as well as the three existing ones
from before):
approved
converted_to_draft
As the issue above indicates, we may want to actually
support "approved" if we can find somebody to work
on the webhook. (And then the issue goes a little
broader than what changed here.)
We consolidate the tests and remove the fixtures, which
just have a lot of noisy fields that we ignore. Also,
pull_request__request_review_removed was named improperly.
Our isort configuration was almost Black-compatible, but we were
missing ensure_newline_before_comments.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Rather than catching, checking action type, and possibly re-raising,
instead return None explicitly from `get_subject_and_body`, which
already signals for a blank success result. This collocates the logic
of the action types in one place, and removes the complexity of the
re-raise.
Sentry may get reported multiple exceptions stacks, in the case where
a `raise ...` was caught, and a new exception was `raise`d. In this
case, the `filename` is the most recent exception -- but the
exceptions are stored in the `exception` key in the order in which
they occurred. As such, taking the first value with a `stacktrace`
will result in showing the wrong line, or in no stack trace being
resolved at all.
Look from the last `exception` backwards, for matching stacks.
It's possible that this is a new name for the "due"
field, but it's not totally clear.
In the exception we saw in the field:
payload['action']['data']['old']['dueComplete'] = False
payload['action']['data']['card']['dueComplete'] = True
We remove the fixture for create_check_item, which
has been bit-rotting for as long as we have ignored
this type of card data.
Our new test is more powerful, in the sense that it
shows we successfully ignore all fixtures of this
type.
If we want to handle this, we'll just need to get
new, representative fixture data from trello.
We introduce get_payload for the relatively
exceptional cases where webhooks return payloads
as dicts.
Having a simple "str" type for get_body will
allow us to extract test helpers that use
payloads from get_body() without the ugly
`Union[str, Dict[str, str]]` annotations.
I also tightened up annotations in a few places
where we now call get_payload (using Dict[str, str]
instead of Dict[str, Any]).
In the zendesk test I explicitly stringify
one of the parameters to satisfy mypy.
If we're not passing in expected_topic or expected_message
to check_webhook, it's better to just call send_webhook_payload,
since we'll want to explicitly check our messages
anyway.
This preps us to always require those fields for
check_webhook, which can prevent insidious testing no-ops.
This forces us to be a bit more explicit about testing
the three key values in any stream message, and it
also de-clutters the code a bit. I eventually want
to phase out do_test_topic and friends, since they
have the pitfall that you can call them and have them
do nothing, because they don't actually require
values to be be passed in.
I also clean up the code a bit for the tests that
have two new messages arriving.
Having an optional stream_name parameter makes
it confusing to read the code if you know your
webhook is sending private messages.
And then the other two callers are already
checking topics, so they might as well check
stream names, too.
We also have the two stream-oriented callers
make their own call to "subscribe". And we
future-proof this by making sure the exception
for no-message-being-sent calls out that gotcha.
Somewhat in passing, we now assert that
self.STREAM_NAME is not None in the main
helper. This is partly to satisfy mypy, but
it's also a good sanity check.
This also sets the stage for the next commit,
where I'll add an assert_stream_message helper.
Not all webhook payloads are json, so send_json_payload was a
bit misleading.
In passing I also remove "bytes" from the Union type for
"payload" parameter.
Almost all webhook tests use this helper, except a few
webhooks that write to private streams.
Being concise is important here, and the name
`self.send_and_test_stream_message` always confused
me, since it sounds you're sending a stream message,
and it leaves out the webhook piece.
We should consider renaming `send_and_test_private_message`
to something like `check_webhook_private`, but I couldn't
decide on a great name, and it's very rarely used. So
for now I just made sure the docstrings of the two
sibling functions reference each other.
The "EXPECTED_" prefix and "_EVENTS" suffix
usually provided more noise than signal.
We also use module constants to avoid the "self."
noise. It also makes it a bit more clear which
constants actually have to be in the class (e.g.
"FIXTURE_DIR_NAME") to do their job.
We had optional parameters for expected_topic and
expected_message, which are trivial to eliminate,
since the integration is really simple.
And we were doing strange things trying to reset
class variables at the end of tests. Now we just
set them explicitly in the tests.
The test helper here was taking an "expected_topic"
parameter that it just ignored, and then the
dialogflow tests were passing in expected messages
in that slot, so the actual "expected_message" var
was "None" and was ignored. So the tests weren't
testing anything.
Now we eliminate the crufty expected_topic parameter
and require an actual value for "expected_message".
I also clean up the mypy type for content_type,
and I remove the `content_type is None` check,
since all callers either pass in a str content
type or default to "application/json".
Per [1], the sentry API returns frames sorted from oldest to newest.
As such, matching against the first filename that matches is most
likely not the right frame.
Match against the last frame with the guilty filename.
[1] https://develop.sentry.dev/sdk/event-payloads/stacktrace/
These weren’t wrong since orjson.JSONDecodeError subclasses
json.JSONDecodeError which subclasses ValueError, but the more
specific ones express the intention more clearly.
(ujson raised ValueError directly, as did json in Python 2.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver