This commit adds a new test to check how the visibility policy updates
when moving messages to a topic that didn't exist previously.
This test also helps us adding coverage for the code which just
skips setting visibility_policy if there is no need to update the
value because both previous and new value of visibility policy
is INHERIT. The "actions/message_edit.py" file has 100% coverage
now and thus is removed from "not_yet_fully_covered" list.
The code for updating visibility policy values on moving messages
had two bugs.
- There was a typo in elif condition where "user_profile" was being
used instead of "user_profile_with_policy".
This commit fixes the typo.
- It was assumed that there would be no UserTopic rows for target
topic if the target topic didn't exist. But there can be such case
where some messages were sent to that topic and the user muted
the topic. But then the messages in that topic was deleted. In
such case there can be UserTopic rows for a stream-topic pair
that does not exist.
This commit fixes the code to handle such case as well and set
the visibility policy of new topic to what was set for the original
topic. This change simplifies the condition to just check whether
new_visibility_policy is equal to target_topic_visibility_policy
and skip if so, and update the visibility policy otherwise.
Due to this change, we now do not try to mute the already muted
topic if the topic is moved to a topic which didn't exist
previously and thus we modify the existing test to not expect
any INFO logs.
This commit adds tests to cover the case of message editing
not allowed due to allow_message_editing set to False and
the case when there is no limit set when moving all messages
in a topic.
The "actions/message_edit.py" file does not have 100% coverage
still and it will be addressed in the next commit.
We do not pass "email_address_visibility" to do_create_realm
anymore. It was passed before to set the setting for realms in
development database, but it has been changed since we changed
email_address_visibility to be a user-level setting instead
of realm-level setting since now it is set on RealmUserDefault
table.
Adds test coverage for the error sent for editing a scheduled
message that was successfully sent.
`zerver/actions/scheduled_messages.py` now has 100% test coverage
again.
We were missing a few checks for raw_unread_msgs being present before
trying to parse and update it.
The test only covers 2/3 of the cases, but I wasn't convinced it was
worth adding another test just for the corner case of removing a
message flag; this seems fairly unlikely to regress.
We now allow users to invite without specifying any stream to join.
In such cases, the user would join the default streams, if any, during
the process of account creation after accepting the invite.
It is also fine if there are no default streams and user isn't
subscribed to any stream initially.
We do not add user to the default streams if the streams list passed
while sending the invite (both email and multi-use) was empty since
invite explicitly selected to not subscribe the user to default
streams.
Previously, it seemed possible for the scheduled messages API to try
to send infinite copies of a message if we had the very poor luck of a
persistent failure happening after a message was sent.
The failure_message field supports being able to display what happened
in the scheduled messages modal, though that's not exposed to the API
yet.
The previous logic would attempt to send a large number of unrelated
messages in a single transaction, which is just asking for trouble in
the event that one of the attempts fails.
For scheduled stream messages, we already limited the `to`
parameter to be the stream ID, but here we return a JsonableError
in the case of a ValueError when the passed value is not an integer.
For scheduled direct messages, we limit the list for the `to`
parameter to be user IDs. Previously, we accepted emails like
we do when sending messages.
Test coverage for `zerver/actions/message_delete.py`.
Both callers of this function would already return if there were
no Messages specified to delete, which is why existing tests did
not cover this.
Doing so causes the "username resolved this topic" or "this topic was
moved by username" notifications to be attributed to a random user who
had a visibility policy on the topic.
The comment was outdated, currently we import UserProfiles before
realm_tables - because some models in realm_tables have a dependency on
UserProfile.
Also makes sense to elaborate a bit more in the comment that it's just
an outline of the ordering, not an exhaustive list.
Fixes#25414.
We add Attachment.scheduled_messages relation to track ScheduledMessages
which reference the attachment.
The import bits can be done after merging this, by updating #25345.
This was doing bulk_create in a loop for each realm, which is too slow
on very large servers. Just do a single bulk_create with a reasonable
batch_size at the end.
Alex Vandiver
Sahil Batra
Lauryn Menard
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Alya Abbott
Aman Agrawal
sbansal1999
Mateusz Mandera