The description of request parameter of update-subscription-settings was
wrongly pasted in yaml and wasn't completely removed from the md file.
Made appropriate fixes in yaml and md file.
test_signup: This test was wrong, because the inviter UserProfile was
from a different realm. Such a PreregistrationUser shouldn't be
considered valid.
test_tutorial: The direct call to internal_send_private_message was
using sender's realm as the realm argument which is not valid. It
doesn't lead to any error because the codepath seems to mostly not care
about the realm arg if the sender is a cross-realm bot. From my reading
of the code I think that wrong realm arg here would break user mentions,
because it makes its way to check_message() and then to
build_message_send_dict - but overall the message gets sent without
errors. Either way, this was a bug in the test and should be fixed.
Currently, the ID and Type fields didn't have a description,
and weren't being displayed. Added a schema component to add
descriptions, and display on the api page. Fixes part of #15967.
This commmit includes ROLE_MODERATOR in realm_user_count_by_role.
We also update test_change_role in test_audit_log.py to include
changes for moderator role as well.
Note that at this point, it's not possible to create moderator users;
this just will make it easier to write tests for logic involving them
as we develop the feature.
Have not included "ROLE_MODERATOR" in UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES
in this commit because did not want to update the openapi
docs at this stage as it will be a user-facing change and
not updating the openapi docs with moderator role included in
UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES gives error in ./tools/check-schemas.
The `message_id` was made an `str` object because
the request expected `Dict[str, str]`. The request is now
casted to `Dict[str, Any]` to fix the issue and removed
typecast of `message_id` to str.
python-zulip-api reference:
https://github.com/zulip/python-zulip-api/pull/653
Currently there are only tests for verifying the error case and there
are no tests to check the case where messages are sent successfully
in 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS' stream.
This commit adds tests for checking that full members and bots owned
by them can send message successfully in streams with post policy as
'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS'.
We currently not allow new bots to send message in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS', but we should
allow them to send messages if their owner is a full member.
This will make it consistent with behavior in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_ADMINS_ONLY' where we allow non admin
bots with owner as admin to send messages.
According to tests we should not allow bot without owners to
post in streams with STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS.
But the code does not handle this and the related test passes
and raises error for case of bots without owner because the bot
is itself a new member.
This commit fixes this by adding a condition to check if there
is no bot owner and then raise error if there is no owner.
This is a minor refactor which renames the
notify_topic_moved_streams function to
send_message_moved_breadcrumbs.
This is done because this function will be also used
for other things in the future, when moving streams
or when using the /digress command, for example.
Added assertion to check that if a deprecated flag is in a field's
schema, then it should have deprecated mentioned in description
as well, and moved these checks to a separate function.
Fixes part of #15967.
Add new rest api endpoint GET users/{email} for looking up a user by
email, which is useful especially for corporate API applications that
might already have a user's email address.
Fixes#14302.
It looks like this ritual was born when a type comment wasn’t working
because it was mistyped without the colon.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>'
A few internal fields used for tracking which types of notifications
have already been sent for a given message, like `hander_id` and the
`push_notified` bundle of fields were being incorrectly included in
message events delivered to clients clients.
One could argue these fields might be useful hints to clients, but
because notifications can be triggered later on via
`missedmessage_hook`, they have no useful purpose in the API.
This commit move these extended event field on a `internal_data`
object within the event object, and delete this field in `contents()`
for call points that would serve data to clients.
Tweaked by tabbott to provide a cleaner interface.
We're not bumping API_FEATURE_LEVEL because these fields have always
been documented as being present only due to a bug, so no clients
should be expecting or relying on them.
Fixes: #15947.
user_profile.id was confused for user_profile.recipient_id. These bugs
are particularly sneaky as they can go undetected by tests due to ids of
objects accidentally coinciding. We add a mitigation for this class of
mistakes by shifting the Recipient.id sequence in test db.
This was introduced in dda3ff41e1.
On the rare occasion where user_profile.id would coincide with
recipient_id passed to the function, we would return the wrong value.
That is, instead of correctly returning recipient_id, we would return
sender.recipient_id - recipient id of the sender of the message, thus
possibly returning user_profile.recipient_id (if user_profile is the
sender) - exactly the situation the function wanted to avoid
with the `if recipient_id == my_recipient_id:` if. Ultimately resulting
in incorrect/malformed data in
state['raw_recent_private_conversations'].
nlargest is the natural fit for selecting n biggest items
from an unsorted list. It's more readable as well as more
efficent (even though we don't care much about the efficeny
in this particular case).
The current logic doesn't display data types when the additionalProperties
variables are not object, but are array of strings, etc. Changed the if
condition to allow rendering in such cases.
zerver/lib/users.py has a function named access_user_by_id, which is
used in /users views to fetch a user by it's id. Along with fetching
the user this function also does important validations regarding
checking of required permissions for fetching the target user.
In an attempt to solve the above problem this commit introduces
following changes:
1. Make all the parameters except user_profile, target_user_id
to be keyword only.
2. Use for_admin parameter instead of read_only.
3. Adds a documentary note to the function describing the reason for
changes along with recommended way to call this function in future.
4. Changes in views and tests to call this function in this changed
format.
Changes were tested using ./tools/test-backend.
Fixes#17111.
shanukun
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Tim Abbott
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Alex Vandiver
Mateusz Mandera
sahil839
LoopThrough-i-j
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Sumanth V Rao
Tushar912
Anders Kaseorg
Vishnu KS
Steve Howell
m-e-l-u-h-a-n