A recent commit (5a94bfcb88)
introduced a couple of regressions:
* The part of help.js that highlights the active page in the
sidebar raised an exception on /help and /api since there
was nothing to highlight for the doc roots in the sidebar
anymore.
* Moving the doc root links to the header after the logo made
it such that on narrow mobile widths, there was no way to get
to the doc root since the links in the header were truncated.
With a CSS change by tabbott to avoid awkward vertical spacing.
In this case, for TypeScript narrowing to work correctly, we need
a if statement that check that both of the type are same. The one
condition we had that checked that both have the same type doesn't
work with TypeScript narrowing yet.
We use a Symbol for unassigned_value_sentinel and explictly assign
the compute_value property instead of using Object.assign. Both of
these are needed to type annotate it easily.
The main reason why this is needed is because this seems to be
convention and because we can't easily test event creation without
doing this.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
This commit allows to import the following from rocketchat:
* All users
* All public/private channels
* All teams and its public/private channels
* All discussion rooms as topics in their parent channel
* All the messages in all the channels
* All private conversations
* Reactions on messages (except for custom emojis)
* Mentions in messages (except @all, @here mentions)
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
This commit improves the approach to click on the menu
icon on the right sidebar. It'd first hover on the list
instead of the menu to avoid the occasional "HTML node
not present" error. As menu icon our only visible when
we hover over the item.
I'm not entirely sure what broken this, but both the unread message
pills and the \vdots menu were not centered vertically.
Fix for the unread message pills should be general and complete, since
it just declares center alignment, but the \vdots menu is a hack;
further cleanup of that element's CSS is needed to end up with
something good.
Part of #19272
We still keep refering to this model with "MutedTopic" to reduce the
diff size of this commit. The alias will be removed in the next commit.
This commit skips on renaming the `date_muted` field to something more
general. That will be done in further commits, along with the code and
API changes.
In this commit, we update the UI to:
* Display emoji on the buddy list (right side sidebar).
* Display the emoji picker on the set status overlay.
It also updates the `z-index` of
`#set_user_status_modal`, which was changed from 105
to 1050 in 166bfa4cf8. We change it back to 105, so
emoji-popover can be visible on top of the
`#set_user_status_modal`.
We also remove the `tabindex` property from the
`#set_user_status_modal` so it can allow keyboard
events for emoji popover.
In this commit, we only update the existing architecture
to support the status emoji feature:
* We add the `user_status_emoji_info` map so we can
keep track of the users' staus emoji.
* Listen to the server event to update/set the
`user_status_emoji_info` map.
* Add `status_emoji_info` field, when getting user's data.
This removes some steps which are no longer necessary to be run
in the production upgrade script. The steps were used due to
errors related to supervisor failing to restart which was resolved
in the commit 08c39a7388.
In this commit:
* We update the `UserStatus` model to accept
`AbstractReaction` as a base class so, we can get all the
fields related to store status emoji.
* We update the user status endpoint
(`users/me/status`) to accept status emoji fields.
* We update the user status event to add status emoji
fields.
Co-authored-by: Yash Rathore <33805964+YashRE42@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds can_add_custom_emoji
helper to check whether the user can
add custom emoji or not.
This function will be used further when
add_custom_emoji_policy will be extended
to include all COMMON_POLICY_VALUES.
This commit replaces add_emoji_by_admins_only with
add_custom_emoji_policy in new_feature_tutorial.md
as the old boolean setting is replaced by a new
integer setting.
This commit replaces boolean field add_emoji_by_admins_only with an
integer field add_custom_emoji_policy as we would also add full members
and moderators option for this setting in further commits.
This removes a bunch of non-functional duplicate JavaScript, HTML, and
CSS that was interfering with maintenance on the functional originals,
because it was never clear how to update the duplicates or how to
check that you’d updated the duplicates correctly.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
As explained in the commit 3a35a0b72c9b2c46ed0afa6456d4a5a80a2c12f9:
`nextFocus` is set on a keydown event to indicate where
we should focus on keyup. We can't focus at the time of
keydown because we need to wait for typeahead. And we
can't compute where to focus at the time of keyup because
only the keydown has reliable information about whether it
was a Tab or a Shift+Tab.
Though the previous configuration didn't show any bug but we should
follow the same logic here also.
This commit moves "enter_sends" setting to property_types dict.
With this change, changing enter_sends setting also sends an
event of type "update_display_settings" and thus enables us
to live-update the UI.
Aman Agrawal
Alya Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Priyank Patel
Tim Abbott
Hemanth V. Alluri
Priyansh Garg
Mateusz Mandera
Priyam Seth
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Riken Shah
Gaurav Pandey
sahil839
Anders Kaseorg
akshatdalton
M@
Sahil Batra