‘exit’ is pulled in for the interactive interpreter as a side effect
of the site module; this can be disabled with python -S and shouldn’t
be relied on.
Also, use the NoReturn type where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
As we have seen no further cases of this in production since #23215,
increase the severity to an error, and switch from returning a
list (which is not type-safe if the function declares a QuerySet
return) to returning the QuerySet without caching.
Failing to store the result in the cache, with an error, seems
superior to raising an exception; in both cases the next request will
redo the work, but we are guaranteed a worse user experience if we 500
the request.
Ref https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/23215#discussion_r994186493
The previous regular expression required a `[^\w]` at the start and
end of the match. This had two unintended effects -- it meant that it
could never match at the start or end of a string, and it meant
that *adjacent* words required *two* non-word characters between them,
as the pattern matches cannot overlap.
Switch to allowing string start/end to anchor the matches, and make
the trailing `[^\w]` be a zero-width look-ahead, to allow the patterns
to overlap. Also remove the spurious `^` within the inner character
classes, which prevented `*foo^bar*` from matching. Finally, add
tests to cover the functionality, which was previously untested.
Updates the Hello World integration documentation and the section
of the related tutorial on documenting the example integration
for the currently used shared macro `create-bot-construct-url.md`.
Also, updates them to use the numbered style currently used in
the majority of the integrations documentation pages.
remove_user_from_user_group's only caller has been removed in 271333301d.
Its usage has been superseded by remove_members_from_user_group.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Doing rapid pace mark-as-unread in the Zulip web application, one
observed assertion failures showing that the server would send an
event containing multiple message IDs but only one of the messages
present in the message_details side data structure.
The cause of this was the "virtual events" compression system; two
flags/remove/read events were being combined by simply concatenating
the lists of events, without any attempt to merge the
`message_details` field on those objects.
The immediate fix is to disable virtual events compression for this
event class, but it's not unlikely we'll need to just eliminate the
virtual_events system entirely, because it seems difficult to make it
soundly handle a message whose state for a given flag changes back and
forth while the client is offline.
But we'll leave that for later, since removing that optimization
deserves more discussion than fixing this event corruption bug.
The naive solution #23465 creates situations where the same user can have
multiple reactions as the base emojis are not unique, e.g. +1::skin2
and +1::skin4 would both reduce to +1 but the userlists are separate.
This solution handles the reduction, merges the same-base reactions,
and deduplicates the userlist.
Co-authored-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: rht <rhtbot@protonmail.com>
return inside finally blocks causes exceptions to be silenced.
Although these blocks follow blanket ‘except Exception’ handlers, they
do not seem to have a goal of silencing BaseException and exceptions
thrown by the exception handler, so rewrite them to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Both of these compatibility blocks can be deleted, since you can't
upgrade directly to any supported release from the versions where the
old event formats would be used.
This solves the problem that resolving a topic with a long name (>60
characters) will cause the topic name to be truncated, and thus the edit
message code path thinks that the topic is being moved in addition to
being resolved.
We store the pre-truncation topic and use it to check against the
original topic when determining whether a topic is being moved while
getting (un)resovled or not.
Fixes#23482
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We intended to send both the "topic was resolved" and the "topic was
moved here" notification when resolving and moving a topic at the same
time in #22312.
The previous implementation did not work as expected and it was only
sending the "topic was moved here" notification.
This removes the check for old_topic and new_topic that have
RESOLVED_TOPIC_PREFIX stripped in maybe_send_resolve_notifications, so
that the notification will be sent regardless if the topic name without
the prefix stays the same or not.
Note that weird topic handling ("✔ ✔✔ some topic") in the comments
was added in e231a03eff is unaffected. In case of confusion, the lstrip
check is not essential to detecting topic being unresolved/resolved.
As we mainly have that handled in the latter part of the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
CircleCI has updated its webhook format[1] for CircleCI Cloud,
Server version 3.x and 4.x. This commit rewrites the CircleCI
integration to parse the new webhook structure. The tests have also
been rewritten for the new format.
With this commit, we support webhooks from projects that use GitHub,
BitBucket and GitLab as VCS providers. The CircleCI integration doc
has been updated to mention the same. The doc has also been updated
with the latest instructions for configuring a webhook on the CircleCI
interface, and the new output screenshots.
References:
[1]: https://circleci.com/docs/webhooks
Previously, emoji.json was read from
"$ZULIP_PATH/node_modules/emoji-datasource-google/emoji.json".
This path doesn't exist in production when installing from scratch from
a release tarball. And so, we ensure emoji.json exists by copying it to
`static/generated/emoji`.
With tweaks to comments by tabbott.
Fixes: #23469
This is a follow-up to d201229df8.
do_get_invites_controlled_by_user queries for Confirmations when finding
multiuse invites controlled by a user. This means that a revoked
multiuse invite cannot really be fetched here, because
do_revoke_multi_use_invite deletes the Confirmation object when revoking
the invitations. However, having a defensive assert here should be
useful to make this doesn't secretly break in the future if the query
used changes or if there are unexpected revoked multiuse invites with an
existing Confirmations for any (buggy) reason.
Anders Kaseorg
Lauryn Menard
Alex Vandiver
Zixuan James Li
Tim Abbott
M@
Hari Prashant Bhimaraju
rht
Mateusz Mandera