This improves Google and JWT auth as well as the registration
codepath to log something if the wrong subdomain is encountered.
Ideally, we'd have tests for these, and code to make the Google and JWT
auth cases show a clear error message.
This ensures that everything is using the correct subdomain for
requests. While it probably wouldn't be a real security problem for
the wrong subdomain to work, this enforcement is essential to catching
bugs in the product and users' API scripts.
This adds support for running a Zulip production server with each
realm on its own unique subdomain, e.g. https://realm_name.example.com.
This patch includes a ton of important features:
* Configuring the Zulip sesion middleware to issue cookier correctly
for the subdomains case.
* Throwing an error if the user tries to visit an invalid subdomain.
* Runs a portion of the Casper tests with REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS
enabled to test the subdomain signup process.
* Updating our integrations documentation to refer to the current subdomain.
* Enforces that users can only login to the subdomain of their realm
(but does not restrict the API; that will be tightened in a future commit).
Note that toggling settings.REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS on a live server is
not supported without manual intervention (the main problem will be
adding "subdomain" values for all the existing realms).
[substantially modified by tabbott as part of merging]
This sets the “title” attribute on the image to the actual title of
the image specified by the user in their markdown, rather than just
the URL of the full link to it.
This was the original way to send messages via the Zulip API in the
very early days of Zulip, but was replaced by the REST API back in
2013.
Fixes: #730.
Sorry, couldn't resist wording the commit message like that. :)
The remove_unreachable() method on Message was no longer being
used, and the commit history made it fairly clear we won't need it
in the future.
We can now rely on UserProfile.last_reminder being time zone
aware, or even if it isn't, it's a self-correcting problem the
first time a reminder is sent. (It's a non-problem to be off
by a few timezones if somebody still has an old value there, because
they will still be outside the 1-minute nag window even with the
timezone disparity.)
This is partly a concession to testing; it's really hard to test
that we are flushing the cache properly if tests need to look
at a global variable in models.py that can be re-assigned on every
request. Extracting this function makes it easy for tests to know
whether a domain is in the local cache.
We currently do
var invite_suffix = "{{invite_suffix}}";
in javascript in the initial_invite_page.html template.
This sets invite_suffix to "{{invite_suffix}}" when the template is rendered
without invite_suffix in the params, rather than to "" as intended. This
later causes problems in the invite_email validator in initial_invite.js.
We no longer use all the alert words for all the users in the
entire realm when we look for alert words in a newly sent/edited
message. Now we limit the search to only all the alert words
for all the users who will get UserMessage records. This will
hopefully make a big difference for big realms where most messages
are only sent to a small subset of users.
The bugdown parser no longer has a concept of which users need which
alert words, since it can't really do anything actionable with that info
from a rendering standpoint.
Instead, our calling code passes in a set of search words to the parser.
The parser returns the list of words it finds in the message.
Then the model method builds up the list of user ids that should be
flagged as having alert words in the message.
This refactoring is a little more involved than I'd like, but there are
still some circular dependency issues with rendering code, so I need to
pass in the rather complicated realm_alert_words data structure all the way
from the action through the model to the renderer.
This change shouldn't change the overall behavior of the system, except
that it does remove some duplicate regex checks that were occurring when
multiple users may have had the same alert word.
We now use render_incoming_message() to render all incoming
new messages (sends/edits), so that they will get the same treatment.
This change also establishes do_send_messages() as the code
path to get new messages rendered. It removes some
logic from check_message() that only happened on certain code paths
for sending messages, and which would only detect failures by
expensively rendering messages, so it wasn't much of a guard.
This change also helps to phase out maybe_render_content(), which
deepens the call stack without providing much clarity to the reader,
since it's behavior is so variable.
Finally, this sets up to fix a flaw in the way we compute which
users have alert words in their messages (in a subsequent commit).
If you supplied an unrecognizable address to our email system,
or you had EMAIL_GATEWAY_PATTERN configured wrong,
the get_missed_message_token_from_address() used to crash
hard and cryptically with a traceback saying that you can't
call startswith() on a None object.
Now we throw a ZulipEmailForwardError exception. This will
still lead to a traceback, but it should be easier to diagnose
the problem.
In our email mirror, we have a special format for missed
message emails that uses a 32-bit randomly generated token
that we put into redis that is then prefixed with "mm" for
a total of 34 characters.
We had a bug where we would mis-classify emails like
mmcfoo@example.com as being these system-generated emails
that were part of the redis setup.
It's actually a little unclear how the bug in the library
function would have manifested from the user's point of view,
but it was definitely buggy code, and it's possibly related in
a subtle way to an error report we got from a customer where
only one of their users, who happened to have a name like
mmcfoo, was having problems with the mirror.
Tim Abbott
Tim Abbott
hackerkid
Brock Whittaker
Steve Howell
Umair Khan
Sahil Dua
Supriya
Rishi Gupta
Tomasz Kolek