It wasn't obvious reading this message that you can perfectly well
bring your own SSL/TLS certificate; unless you read quite a bit
between the lines where we say "could not find", or followed the link
to the detailed docs, the message sounded like you had to either use
--certbot or --self-signed-cert.
So, explicitly mention the BYO option. Because the "complete chain"
requirement is a bit tricky, don't try to give instructions for it
in this message; just refer the reader to the docs.
Also, drop the logic to identify which of the files is missing; it
certainly makes the code more complex, and I think even the error
message is actually clearer when it just gives the complete list of
required files -- it's much more likely that the reader doesn't know
what's required than that they do and have missed one, and even then
it's easy for them to look for themselves.
Following templates are affected: display-settings.handlebars and
ui-settings.handlebars.
There will be no UI change, it is just to make code more readable.
In this commit:
Two new URLs are added, to make all realms accessible for server
admins. One is for the stats page itself and another for getting
chart data i.e. chart data API requests.
For the above two new URLs corresponding two view functions are
added.
This doesn't look amazing, but it's better than not linking to the
blog, and adding a 6th line both makes the footer excessive and also
breaks some styling in pages like /login that assume a fixed footer
height.
This was stored as a fixture file under zerver/fixtures, which caused
problems, since we don't show that directory under production (as its
part of the test system).
The simplest emergency fix here would be to just move the file, but
when looking at it, it's clear that we don't need or want a fixture
file here; we want a Python object, so we just do that.
A valuable follow-up improvement to this block would be to create an
actual new Realm object (not saved to the database), and dump it the
same code we use in the export tool; that should handle the vast
majority of these correctly.
Fixes#9123.
There was really no reason for this to be a nested function, since
we weren't closing on any variables. Flatter is better. Also, it
is plausible that folks will want more control over creating
individual jQuery elements (but still want this helper).