We now update all test messages to have a pub_date
of "now" in the setUp() function in TestRetentionLib.
We've seen tests flake on query counts before this
patch. It's not certain that the test flaked due
to time-related glitches, but it seems the most
plausible explanation.
The "/stats" command doesn't actually do anything
interesting yet, and it also writes to the message
feed instead of replying directly to the user.
The history of this command was that it was
written during a PyCon sprint. It was mainly intended
as an example for subsequent slash commands. The
ones we built after "/stats" have sort of outgrown
"/stats" and don't follow the original structure
for "/stats". (The "/day", "/ping", and "/settings"
commands were built shortly after.)j
We probably want to ressurect "/stats" fairly soon,
after figuring out some useful stats and refining
the UI.
As you can see from this commit, resurrecting the
code here shouldn't be too difficult, but it
may actually be pretty rare that we just translate
slash commands into fleshed out messages.
Since otp_encrypt_api_key only encrypts API keys, it doesn't require
access to the full UserProfile object to work properly. Now the
parameter it accepts is just the API key.
This is preparatory refactoring for removing the api_key field on
UserProfile.
random_api_key, the function we use to generate random tokens for API
keys, has been moved to zerver/lib/utils.py because it's used in more
parts of the codebase (apart from user creation), and having it in
zerver/lib/create_user.py was prone to cyclic dependencies.
The function has also been renamed to generate_api_key to have an
imperative name, that makes clearer what it does.
Now reading API keys from a user is done with the get_api_key wrapper
method, rather than directly fetching it from the user object.
Also, every place where an action should be done for each API key is now
using get_all_api_keys. This method returns for the moment a single-item
list, containing the specified user's API key.
This commit is the first step towards allowing users have multiple API
keys.
The validate_api_key sentence may look a bit confusing since we are
using webhook_bot's email address but default_bot's API key.
At first sight, and without any context on these tests, it may look like
that's just a typo, but we do want it to be like it is right now because
that way the API key used doesn't correspond to the provided email
address (triggering some untested parts of our backend logic).
Due to copyright issues with potentially displaying Apple emojisets on
non-apple devices, as well as iamcal dropping support for the emojione
emojiset (see https://github.com/iamcal/emoji-data/pull/142), we are
dropping (perhaps temporarily) support for allowing users to switch
emojisets in Zulip.
This commit just hides the feature from the user but leaves most of
the infrastructure in place so that in the future if we decide to
re-enable the support we will not need to redo the infrastructure work
(some JS-side code is deleted, mostly because we'll want to re-add the
feature using the do_settings_change infrastructure anyway).
The most likely emoji set to add is the legacy "blobs" Google emoji
set, since it seems popular with some users.
Tweaked by tabbott to remove some additional JS code and update the
changelog.
Importing the Django test client is somewhat expensive, and we only
use it within one view function that's not used in production. So
there's a significant startup-time performance optimization in doing
an import inside the view code.
python-twitter was consuming a significant amount of import time.
However, this commit seems to not save any time at all, probably
because its recursive dependencies are imported elsewhere in Zulip.
This test refactor makes the subscription/stream settings changes use standard
APIs and thus be easier to follow (and more robust to subtle re-fetching bugs).
This is a follow-up to #9181.
Renaming a user group to a name shared by other group wasn't a scenario
handled by the backend, and the server errored whenever this was
attempted.
Now a json_error is returned, letting the user know that a user group
with that name already exists.
The use_first_unread_anchor parameter allows automatically setting the
anchor to the first message that hasn't been read in this narrow.
Therefore it isn't necessary to specify an anchor when this parameter is
enabled.
Note from Tim: Arguably, we should think about making
`use_first_unread_anchor` the default behavior when anchor is
unspecified, but that's for later consideration.
We found out in #9953 that, appparently, loading the OpenAPI file was
taking abut a 5% of the Zulip server startup time.
Since in many cases (especially in development) having the file loaded
won't be necessary at all, we read it on the first time data from the
OpenAPI spec is needed.
Tweaked by tabbott to add a test.
Automatically detect if the OpenAPI spec file has been modified since
the last time it was loaded into memory, and if it has, automatically
reload it to have the latest version.
This feature is designed with development environments in mind. The main
benefit is being able to see the changes made to the OpenAPI document
without needing to restart the development server, which is tedious and
slows the documentation workflow down.
When last user(only in case of admin) unsubscribe from private stream,
stream page doesn't get updated. Cause we delete the private stream
as soon as last user unsubscribe from stream.
So `sub` get undefined in frontend, cause that stream is deleted
before unsubscribe-user-from-stream event is received.
Fix this by changing order of events sent to frontend. Event
`subscription: remove` should be sent before `stream: delete` event
from backend.
This fixes a bug where administrators couldn't remove private
unsubscribed streams from the "default streams" list, because
access_stream_by_name didn't give them access to the stream object.
This commit adds 'resize_gif()' function which extracts each frame,
resize it and coalesces them again to form the resized GIF while
preserving the duration of the GIF. I read some stackoverflow
answers all of which were referring to BiggleZX's script
(https://gist.github.com/BigglesZX/4016539) for working with animated
GIF. I modified the script to fit to our usecase and did some manual
testing but the function was failing for some specific GIFs and was not
preserving the duration of animation. So I went ahead and read about
GIF format itself as well as PIL's `GifImagePlugin` code and came up
with this simple function which gets the worked done in a much cleaner
way. I tested this function on a number of GIF images from giphy.com
and it resized all of them correctly.
Fixes: #9945.
Email notifications for new logins displayed the login timestamp's
timezone in the location format (e.g. "Asia/Taipei"). Since that can
lead users to understand the login came from that place, the timezone in
those emails is now represented in +/-HHMM format.
Fixes#10178.
This flag is used to track which user/message pairs correspond to an
active mobile push notification, that should potentially be cleared
when the user reads the message.
This flag should never appear on a message that is also marked as
read; eventually we may want a cron job to check for that condition.
We include a partial index on UserMessage for this flag.
This adds a new function called handle_remove_push_notification in
zerver/lib/push_notifications.py which requires user_profile id and
the message id which has to be removed in the function.
For now, the function only supports GCM (and is mostly there for
prototyping).
The payload which is being delivered needs to contain the narrow
information and the content of the message.
This should make it much simpler for the mobile apps to line up the
data from server_settings against the data in the notifications.
Addresses part of #10094.
This ensures that the format of this data structures matches that for
in-realm bots in the main users data structure (including avatars,
etc.).
Fixes#10138.
For realms that don't have any presence-active users, we know for a
fact that there aren't any active clients that will be reloading just
after the server restarts, so we can skip filling the cache with data
related to that realm.
For zulipchat.com, this results in a significant performance
optimization for the recipient and stream caches, and a moderate
performance improvement for the user caches as well.
Private messages make up the bulk of Recipient objects. While private
messages are ~50% of messages, if you weight by messages received
(which is what is important for message-loading performance), it's
pretty strongly balanced towards stream messages.
We don't need to include long-term idle or other inactive users here,
since fetching them consumed to vast majority of the time.
(On chat.zulip.org, this decreased the runtime for populating the user
cache by 5x, removing only users we're unlikely to need to access).
This doesn't seem to have a huge performance downside (less than 1s
extra time for loading / on chat.zulip.org), and it means the
possibility of users having so many unreads that we get weird/buggy
behavior is much more unlikely to exist.
We'll still want a better experience for users who somehow go over
this limit, but it can be pretty firmly "you need to go mark some
things as read".
This renames Realm.show_digest_email field to
digest_emails_enabled, for greater clarity as to what it does
just from seeing the setting name, without having to look it up.
Fixes part of #10042.
We were getting event-handling exceptions in JS in production if a new
user was created and then went and set a custom profile field, because
there was no `.profile_data` on their user object. We were able to
trace the issue down to the fact that our events didn't include that
field when creating a new user.
This renames Realm.restricted_to_domain field to
emails_restricted_to_domains, for greater clarity as to what it does
just from seeing the setting name, without having to look it up.
Fixes part of #10042.
The previous error messages for this were written for a tool only to
be used by a couple people, and didn't make clear what potential
causes were. Tweak these to provide greater clarity about what's
going on.
The main cause of these errors appearing in practice was fixed in
7ea5987e5d, but nothing strongly
prevents a similar issue from being introduced in the future.
Fixes#10078.
Apparently, our old unminify logic relied on the fact that the
filenames displayed in tracebacks were of the form "app.js" (and the
`app.js` copy of the source map in the appropriate
`/home/zulip/deployments/`). The correct behavior is to just look up
the source map for the appropriate hash-named
`app.a40806b10565c1dee5bf.js` type file.
We fix this with a few small tweaks to the regular expressions. I
wish this file had reasonable unit tests.
We already had a setting for whether these logs were enabled; now it
also controls which stream the messages go to.
As part of this migration, we disable the feature in dev/production by
default; it's not useful for most environments.
Fixes the proximal data-export issue reported in #10078 (namely, a
stream with nobody ever subscribed to having been created).
The is_private flag is intended to be set if recipient type is
'private'(1) or 'huddle'(3), otherwise i.e if it is 'stream'(2), it
should be unset.
This commit adds a database index for the is_private flag (which we'll
need to use it). That index is used to reset the flag if it was
already set. The already set flags were due to a previous removal of
is_me_message flag for which the values were not cleared out.
For now, the is_private flag is always 0 since the really hard part of
this migration is clearing the unspecified previous state; future
commits will fully implement it actually doing something.
History: Migration rewritten significantly by tabbott to ensure it
runs in only 3 minutes on chat.zulip.org. A key detail in making that
work was to ensure that we use the new index for the queries to find
rows to update (which currently requires the `order_by` and `limit`
clauses).
As part of our effort to change the data model away from each user
having a single API key, we're eliminating the couple requests that
were made from Django to Tornado (as part of a /register or home
request) where we used the user's API key grabbed from the database
for authentication.
Instead, we use the (already existing) internal_notify_view
authentication mechanism, which uses the SHARED_SECRET setting for
security, for these requests, and just fetch the user object using
get_user_profile_by_id directly.
Tweaked by Yago to include the new /api/v1/events/internal endpoint in
the exempt_patterns list in test_helpers, since it's an endpoint we call
through Tornado. Also added a couple missing return type annotations.
This is a preparatory refactor for adding
UserProfile.can_subscribe_other_users.
Although there existed a test for limiting users from creating
streams at `test_subs.test_user_settings_for_adding_streams`,
it did not test the logic inside can_add_streams, tests have
been added to solve that issue.
Extracting this helper library will help us avoid an import loop
between notifications.py and message.py (with bugdown in between).
But in addition to that, it's a more natural model, since some of the
uses for these functions weren't part of the notifications code
anyway.
It's sorta an unusual state to get into, to have a user own a
deactivated bot, when they can't create a bot of that type, but
definitely a valid possibility that we should be checking for.
Fixes#10087.
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a BitBucket integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gogs integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a GitHub integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gitlab integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/MR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).