Updates the `update_message` event type to always include a `stream_id`
field when the message being edited is a stream message. This change
aligns with the current definition of the `\get-events` endpoint
in the OpenAPI documentation.
It is better to press on, than stop halfway through due to a user
whose email no longer works. The exception is already logged, which
is sufficient here, as this is generally run interactively.
These fundamentally tested send_email, not build_email, and thus
belong in TestSendEmail, not TestBuildEmail. They also duplicated the
code in test_send_email_exceptions; reuse it.
This allows verify_uploads to use the database
as the authoritative source for what attachments
we need to look for when we're verifying the
images got exported properly, while still
also verifying attachment.json is correct.
It is better for the verifying code to just explicitly
ensure that the exported file bytes match the bytes
in the test image. This introduces a tiny bit more
of I/O.
It's easier to read the code without the intermediate
full_data dictionary that obscures where the files live.
We also avoid some unnecessary file i/o in the tests.
We do a sanity check for every table
that gets written to user.json as part of
the single-user export.
If we add more tables to the single-user export,
the test that I modified here will now ask
the author to add a new checker function, which
means we should always have at least a basic
sanity check for every exported table as long
as we stay in this new paradigm.
We also remove a little bit of old code that
became redundant.
This replaces the TERMS_OF_SERVICE and PRIVACY_POLICY settings with
just a POLICIES_DIRECTORY setting, in order to support settings (like
Zulip Cloud) where there's more policies than just those two.
With minor changes by Eeshan Garg.
We do s/TOS/TERMS_OF_SERVICE/ on the name, and while we're at it,
remove the assumed zerver/ namespace for the template, which isn't
correct -- Zulip Cloud related content should be in the corporate/
directory.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
These variables can be unset if the `os.path.exists` check fails.
That should be rare, since we've previously checked the files do
exist before getting here.
Lauryn Menard
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera