Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This makes the implementation of `get_realm` consistent with its
declared return type of `Realm` rather than `Optional[Realm]`.
Fixes#12263.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The only changes visible at the AST level, checked using
https://github.com/asottile/astpretty, are
zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py:
'\x1b\\[(1|0)m' ↦ '\\x1b\\[(1|0)m'
'\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\n' ↦ '\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\\n'
which is fine because re treats '\\x1b' and '\\n' the same way as
'\x1b' and '\n'.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
The main limitation of this version is that it's controlled entirely
from settings, with nothing in the database and no web UI or even
management command to control it. That makes it a bit more of a
burden for the server admins than it'd ideally be, but that's fine
for now.
Relatedly, the web flow for realm creation still requires choosing a
subdomain even if the realm is destined to live at an alias domain.
Specific to the dev environment, there is an annoying quirk: the
special dev login flow doesn't work on a REALM_HOSTS realm. Also,
in this version the `add_new_realm` and `add_new_user` management
commands, which are intended for use in development environments only,
don't support this feature.
In manual testing, I've confirmed that a REALM_HOSTS realm works for
signup and login, with email/password, Google SSO, or GitHub SSO.
Most of that was in dev; I used zulipstaging.com to also test
* logging in with email and password;
* logging in with Google SSO... far enough to correctly determine
that my email address is associated with some other realm.
If a Zulip install at example.org got a request at an HTTP `Host`
like foo.example.org.evil.com (or even foo.example.orgevil.com),
we would accept it as subdomain foo. This isn't likely to happen
in practice because it shouldn't pass ALLOWED_HOSTS, and it's not
obvious to me that anything untoward could be done with it even
if ALLOWED_HOSTS were set wide open, but if nothing else it
multiplies the cases in analyzing this logic.
The reason we had a loose match like this, I assume, is to allow
the user to come from arbitrary ports -- especially in development.
So tighten the pattern to allow just that, and add some tests for
that behavior and a comment explaining why this complication is
needed.
These are just instances that jumped out at me while working on the
subdomains code, mostly while grepping for get_subdomain call sites.
I haven't attempted a comprehensive search, and there are likely
still others left.
Now that the old `check_subdomain` has no callers except in
implementing the new, improved interface `user_matches_subdomain`,
inline it into that. Also simplify the Boolean logic a bit.
Now that every call site of check_subdomain produces its second
argument in exactly the same way, push that shared bit of logic
into a new wrapper for check_subdomain.
Also give that new function a name that says more specifically what
it's checking -- which I think is easier to articulate for this
interface than for that of check_subdomain.
Anders Kaseorg
Vishnu Ks
Anders Kaseorg
Aditya Bansal
Tim Abbott
rht
Greg Price