Implement few optimizations for reading admin's bot dicts from database
for a constants number of requests:
- add models.get_user_profiles_by_ids() for reading bots profiles
by single query from database
- add models.get_services_for_bots() for reading services for bots
by single query from database
- add bot_config.get_bot_configs() for reading config data for bots
by single query from database
Fixes#8838
Fixes#8853.
In certain cases, the browser is not able to look up the message.
Include the recipient data for the message in the delete_message event,
so look up of those attributes by the browser isn't required.
This bot was basically a duplicate of NOTIFICATION_BOT for some
specific corner cases, and didn't add much value. It's better to just
eliminate it, which also removes some ugly corner cases around what
happens if the user account doesn't exist.
webhook-errors.log file is cluttered with Stream.DoesNotExist
errors, which hides the errors that we actually need to see. So,
since check_message already sends the bot_owner a PM if the webhook
bot tries to send a message to a non-existent stream, we can ignore
such exceptions.
Add function in user-groups.py for getting member ids
for a group.
Update view to enforce checks for modifying user-groups.
Only admins and user group members can modify user-groups.
There were two instances of `ensure_stream` being called and assigned to
a variable with the variable not being used elsewhere. pyflakes picked
up on this (where it didn't in the previous version likely due to tuple
unpacking), so the the variable assignment has been replaced with a call
to `ensure_stream`.
Issue #2088 asked for a wrapper to be created for
`create_stream_if_needed` (called `ensure_stream`) for the 25 times that
`create_stream_if_needed` is called and ignores whether the stream was
created. This commit replaces relevant occurences of
`create_stream_if_needed` with `ensure_stream`, including imports.
The changes weren't significant enough to add any tests or do any
additional manual testing.
The refactoring intended to make the API easier to use in most cases.
The majority of uses of `create_stream_if_needed` ignored the second
parameter.
Fixes: #2088.
This commit migrates realm emoji to be addressed by their `id` rather
than their name. This fixes a long standing issue which was causing
an error on uploading an emoji with same name as a deactivated realm
emoji.
Fixes: #6977.
We disabled the original "colorized HTML edit-history" feature way
back in 2013 in c51056ff8e.
That original feature involved showing what had been edited inline in
message bodies, so one could easily see what had been changed.
That old feature has since been replaced with the "view edit history"
menu option, and we're unlikely to ever want the old feature back.
So, we can just remove its code. There's a few supporting variables
that were created to help implement this; we can clean those up and
simplify the `update_message` code now that this feature is fully
removed.
This applies only on a server open for anyone to create a realm.
Moreover, if the server admins have granted any given realm a
max_invites greater than the default, that realm is exempt too.
This fixes an unpleasant regression in
f5edeb01ae, where we stopped correctly
filtering users who have an open browser session that's idle. These
users are tagged as "UserPresence.IDLE" with an current timestamp in
the database, and should be treated as idle for presence purposes.
As a result, if you had an open Zulip browser session, you incorrectly
wouldn't get missed-message emails for PMs and mentions before this fix.
Currently, when other private stream subscriber add realm admin to
stream, new copy private stream is created in realm admin's streams.
Which resulted in error, cause there are two similar stream element
in stream settings.
If new subscriber is added to private stream, we first send them
stream `create` event, cause private stream are not visible until
user don't get subscribed at least once. But realm admins can now
always access private stream, so when realm admin is subscribed to
stream, realm admin get stream `create` event even if stream already
exist in on realm admin client side.
Fix this by extracting realm admins from stream `create` event on
`add` subscription operation and sending private stream `create`
event to all realm admins on stream creation operation.
Fixes#8695
This commit adds a generic function called check_send_webhook_message
that does the following:
* If a stream is specified in the webhook URL, it sends a stream
message, otherwise sends a PM to the owner of the bot.
* In the case of a stream message, if a custom topic is specified
in the webhook URL, it uses that topic as the subject of the
stream message.
Also, note that we need not test this anywhere except for the
helloworld webhook. Since helloworld is our default example for
webhooks, it is here to stay and it made sense that tests for a
generic function such as check_send_webhook_message be tested
with an actual generic webhook!
Fixes#8607.
This will allow realm admins to access subscribers of unsubscribed
private stream. This is a preparatory commit for letting realm admins
remove those users.
Apparently, we did essentially all the work to support showing full
topic history to newly subscribed users from a data flow perspective,
but didn't actually enable this feature by having the topic history
endpoint grant access to historical topics. This fixes that gap.
I'm not altogether happy with how the code and tests read for this
feature; the code itself has more duplication than I'd like, and the
tests do too, but it works.
If new private stream is created by realm admin without realm admin
subscribed to it, then it doesn't automatically add created stream to
realm admin's stream list. We have to reload the browser to get newly
created stream in stream list. Cause private stream creation event is
only sent to the subscribed users to private stream, so even if realm
admin is acting user, they don't get creation event.
We should send private stream creation event to realm admin users along
with subscribed user to stream, as realm admins can access unsubscribed
private streams.
Tweaked by tabbott to fix various typos and clean up the code.
Adds realm_bot delete event. On bot ownership change, add event is
sent to the bot_owner(if not admin) and delete event to the
previous bot owner(if not admin). For admin, update event is sent.
This sets up a new test class with a simple
test, mostly for increasing coverage. The class
should in the future be extended to properly
verify the handle_feedback() logic.
Previously, when a user updated the config data of an
embedded bot, only the updated fields were dispatched
back to the client. Dispatching all config data fields
makes the client updating code less brittle.
models.py should only contain thin wrapper functions. Furthermore,
this move allows us to remove the circular imports. The two moved
functions are interdependent and are thus moved in one commit.
Creating the very first organization administrator user and
subscribing them to streams before any messages were sent resulted in
RealmAuditLog entries being created with a `event_last_message_id` of
None, because that's the maximum ID in the empty set.
We correct this by fixing the incorrectly created RealmAuditLog
entries, both for new servers and also fixing old broken entries on
existing servers.
This fixes an issue where if a user setup a Zulip server with just the
organization administrator, and then forgot about it (so that the
initial user became soft-deactivated), trying to sign in 3 weeks later
would throw an exception.
This fixes the issue reported here:
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/9-issues/subject/500.20error.20on.20login/near/511981
This adds button under "Organization profile" settings, which
deactivates the organization and sends an "event" to all the
active user and log out them.
Fixes: #8212.
This is based on usage in bulk_change_user_names.py, and that
the RealmAuditLog acting_user field is Optional[UserProfile].
This could be more meaningfully changed in future, perhaps to
indicate that the command was run by a specific zulip user.
In order to get test coverage on topic name checks, we
do them in Addressee, so that we don't hit an assertion
first. The assertion in question is in Addressee.topic(),
and it was added partly to appease mypy.
Adds a check for newline that was present on backend, but missing in the
frontend markdown implementation. Updating messages uses is_me_message flag
received from server instead of its own partial test. Similarly, rendering
previews uses markdown code.
Fixes#6493.
This is the first step for allowing users
to edit a bot's service entries, name the
outgoing webhook configuration entries. The
chosen data structures allow for a future
with multiple services per bot; right now,
only one service per bot is supported.
We add two functions:
1.) check_schedule_message(): This function is responsible for
doing the essential initial checkes to verify the validity of
the message. These checkes include things like if user is
allowed to send messages to some stream or not or if the user is
a super_user. All this is basically done by further calling
check_message() with appropriate parameters. This is on the same
lines as is check_send_message().
2.) do_schedule_messages(): This function is responsible for
creating ScheduleMessage table rows for a list of messages that
are to be scheduled. This basically accumulates the ScheduleMessage
objects in a list and then bulk creates the rows.
The original logic is buggy now that emails can belong to (and be
invited to) multiple realms.
The new logic in the `invites` queue worker also avoids the bug where
when the PreregistrationUser was gone by the time the queue worker got
to the invite (e.g., because it'd been revoked), we threw an exception.
[greg: fix upgrade-compatibility logic; add test; explain
revoked-invite race above]
This code changes frequently enough that errors are bound to creep in. The
main change is that this sends the original invitation email instead of the
reminder email, but I think that's fine.
[Modified by greg to (1) keep `USERNAME_FIELD = 'email'`,
(2) silence the corresponding system check, and (3) ban
reusing a system bot's email address, just like we do in
realm creation.]
As we migrate to allow reuse of the same email with multiple realms,
we need to replace the old "no email reuse" validators. Because
stealing the email for a system bot would be problematic, we still ban
doing so.
This commit only affects the realm creation logic, not registering an
account in an existing realm.
We would allow a user with a valid invitation for one realm to use it
on a different realm instead. On a server with multiple realms, an
authorized user of one realm could use this (by sending invites to
other email addresses they control) to create accounts on other
realms. (CVE-2017-0910)
With this commit, when sending an invitation, we record the inviting
user's realm on the PreregistrationUser row; and when registering a
user, we check that the PregistrationUser realm matches the realm the
user is trying to register on. This resolves CVE-2017-0910 for
newly-sent invitations; the next commit completes the fix.
[greg: rewrote commit message]
This fixes some subtle JavaScript exceptions we've been getting in
zulipchat.com, caused by the system bot realm there not being "zulip"
interacting with get_cross_realm_users.
This should help protect us from future issues with the way that
`bulk_get_users` does caching.
It's likely that we'll want to further restructure `bulk_get_users` to
not have this base_query code path altogether (since it's kinda
buggy), but I'm going to defer that for a time when we have another
user.
We include ERROR_BOT in this set, even though it's not technically
cross-realm (it just lives in the admin realm).
This code path does not correctly handle emails that correspond to
multiple accounts (because `get_system_bot` does not). Since it's
intended to only be used by system bots, we add an appropriate
assertion to ensure it is only used for system bots.
Previously, this was a ValidationError, but that doesn't really make
sense, since this condition reflects an actual bug in the code.
Because this happened to be our only test coverage the ValidationError
catch on line 84 of registration.py, we add nocoverage there for now.
This fixes a bug where, when a user is unsubscribed from a stream,
they might have unread messages on that stream leak. While it might
seem to be a minor problem, it can cause significant problems for
computing the `unread_msgs` data structures, since it means we need to
add an extra filter for whether the user is still subscribed, either
in the backend or in the UI.
Fixes#7095.
This often can cause minor caching problems.
Obviously, it'd be better if we had access to the AST and thus could
do this rule for UserProfile objects in general.
This endpoint will allow us to add/delete emoji reactions whose emoji
got renamed during various emoji infra changes. This was also a
required change for realm emoji migration.
This commit was tweaked significantly by tabbott for greater clarity
(with no changes to the actual logic).
In remove_members_from_group_backend, we are passing user group to
remove_members_from_user_group. In remove_members_from_user_group,
expect user_group_id.
This fixes a regression in ae5ba7f4fd,
where Zulip would 500 if the newly added system bots didn't exist on
the server.
This also fixes a moderate size performance problem where we'd fetch 5
users from memcached or the database in a loop.
Generally emails are not written with markdown in mind and hence
sometimes render in strange ways. This commit fixes a particular
issue that was causing whitespace before paragraphs to be treated
as code block due to which email content was being rendered in a
box that scrolls in right direction a lot.
Fixes: #7045.
The original PR to allow generic bots to be mentioned had
some merge issues that we detected about a week after the
fact. This commit restores the logic from the original PR.
The reason we didn't detect this bug earlier is that the
merge issues didn't break any existing behavior. Instead,
they made it so that only UserMessage rows got written for
bots, but no events were being set. The part of the commit
that got lost is restored here, so now events get sent as
well.
Thanks to @derAnfaenger for reporting this and being patient
as we tracked it down.
Fixes#7140
We extract get_bulk_stream_subscriber_info() from this
function to remove some of the complexity. Also, in that
new function we avoid a hop to the database by querying
on stream ids instead of recipient ids. The query that
gets changed here does require a join to the recipient
table (to get the stream id), so it's a little bit of a
tradeoff.
There's an implicit assumption in bulk_remove_subscriptions
that all users belong to the same realm. We use the realm
for things like comparing occupied streams before and
after our main operation of deactivating streams.
Before this change, we just used the user_profile variable
that leaked from some prior loop to look up the realm, which
was super brittle.
Now we're a bit more explicit.
Note that this code leads to a slightly different query, because
we join to one row in the small Recipient table to match
stream_id to recipient.type_id.
The first method we extract to this library is
get_active_subscriptions_for_stream_id().
We also move num_subscribers_for_stream_id() to here, which
is slightly annoying (having the method on Stream was nice)
but avoids some circular dependency issues.
This extraction moves all the huddle logic into models.py, which
hopefully can reduce friction for things like re-organizing our
caches (there are two cache entries for every huddle) and/or
just putting huddle_id on Message directly.
Do you call get_recipient(Recipient.STREAM, stream_id) or
get_recipient(stream_id, Recipient.STREAM)? I could never
remember, and it was not very type safe, since both parameters
are integers.
Almost all callers to do_create_user were trying to
create active users, except for one test. The
active=False codepath was kind of broken (things
like sending welcome messages had sort of undefined
behavior there), so instead of trying to maintain it,
we just update the one test (`test_people`) to flip the
`is_active` flag manually.
Fixes#7197
Lets administrators view a list of open(unconfirmed) invitations and
resend or revoke a chosen invitation.
There are a few changes that we can expect for the future:
* It is currently possible to invite an email that you have already
invited, it might make sense to change this behavior.
* Resend currently sends an invite reminder instead of resending the
original invite, this is because 'custom_body' was not stored when
the first invite was sent.
Tweaked in various minor ways, primarily in the backend, by tabbott,
mostly for style consistency with the rest of the codebase.
Fixes: #1180.
Tweaked by tabbott to have the field before the invitation is
completed be called invite_as_admins, not invited_as_admins, for
readability.
Fixes#6834.
novokrest
Shubham Padia
Umair Khan
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Tarun Kumar
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Sarah
Jack Weatherilt
YJDave
Harshit Bansal
Greg Price
Vishnu Ks
Yago González
Robert Hönig
Archana BS
rht
Aastha Gupta
Aditya Bansal
Shubham Dhama
Weronika Grzybowska
snlkapil
Rishi Gupta
Rhea Parekh
Shreyansh Dwivedi
Steve Howell
Henrik Pettersson