This adds three bools to message_container object which calculate bools
where the "(EDITED)" label should appear:
* `edited_in_left_col` -- when label appears in left column.
* `edited_alongside_sender` -- when label appears alongside sender info.
* `edited_status_msg` -- when label appears for a "/me" message.
We use the new bools and remove the complicated if else statements
from the templates for the "(EDITED)" label.
This also allows us to add a unit test to verify the logic.
This fixes several bugs with /me messages:
* We no longer hover name if you're over
the message.
* We now launch the user popup if you
click on the name.
* Even if you click on the avatar, we
launch the user popup to the right
of the name. (I think this is odd,
but it's consistent with how we
do it for normal messages.)
The underlying problem here is that you have
two possible organizations.
From a logical standpoint, the image and
name go together (and both launch the user menu):
img Alice | says hi
From a physical perspective, the main message
is "Alice says hi" and it's aligned differently
from the image:
img | Alice says hi
Our HTML reflects the latter.
HTML doesn't allow overlapping diffs, of course,
so you have to pick your poison.
One goal of this commit is to just make the "happy
path" code a lot easier to read. It should be
pretty easy to verify that in this diff.
And then more stuff is now in me_message.
This is a pure code move, and it doesn't fix these
structural issues yet:
* the "say hi" part of "/me says hi" is
inside ".message_sender" (due to legacy
positioning issues)
* the avatar is outside of .sender-status
(again due to legacy positioning issue)
* we don't have sender_info_hover on
the sender name (which causes it not
to launch the user menu)
Vaibhav
Steve Howell