It would conflict with the stream_id variable after migration to an
ES6 module, and adds no real convenience over stream_sub().
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The configuration change made in 1c17583ad5 only allowed delivery to
those specific Zulip addresses. However, they also prevent the
mailserver from being used as an outgoing email relay from Zulip,
since all mail that passed through the mailserver (from any
originator) was required to have a `RCPT TO` that matched those
regexes.
Allow mail originating from `mynetworks` to have an arbitrary
addresses in `RCPT TO`.
We now no longer define any schemas in test_events--all
of them are in event_schema, which helps our tooling
cross-check schemas for openapi and node tests.
It happens that whether you add a reaction or remove
a reaction, we send the exact same fields, just using
a different op code.
This sort of symmetry is actually kind of rare, as
usually "add" events have more fields, and "remove" events
might just send an id of something to remove.
Our openapi schema treats these as two seperate events,
so we are more consistent with it, and it helps our
schema-checking tooling for node fixtures, too.
Note that we now have to exempt the two events from
our openapi checks, due to the is_mirror_dummy field
in the deprecated user block. We can decide how to
handle this later--one possibility is to just add it
as an optional field on the event_schema side.
Note that we use value_type for value instead of
bool, since properties can be non-bool things
like color, which we just don't test now. We
should test them.
We more than compensate for this by checking
the actual value of the value in
check_subscription_update.
There is a legacy format where we send
singular "message_id" instead of plural
"message_ids".
Then there are different fields for "private"
and "stream" message types.
Note that we make the schema for profile_data
slightly more realistic, but it doesn't actually get
exercised by our current tests (apart from
making sure it's a dict), since we don't have
profile data for our test realm.
We also don't have the optional fields for bots,
since our tests don't exercise that, nor
delivery_email.
So we exempt realm_user_add_event from openapi
checks for now.
When we try to match the openapi specs better, we
will probably want to add a few tests to test_events.
Obviously getting good coverage for adding users
would be nice for all these scenarios:
* delivery_email matters
* bots
* realm has profile fields
This is a prep commit for supporting "presence"
events, where the key of the dictionary is some
arbitrary string like "website" but the value
of the dictionary is another dictionary itself
with keys that are more like variable names.
This also forces us to create TupleType.
We exempt this from the openapi check,
since we haven't figured out how to model
tuples in openapi with the same precision
as event_schema (and it may be impossible).
Long term we just want to stop dealing in
tuples, of course.
StringDict is a data type for representing dictionaries where
all keys and values are strings. Add this data type to data_types.py
and edit other files so that this data type is put to use and tested.
(slightly tweaked by @showell to remove a comment and shorten
a var name now that we have a proper data type)
We also make our schema in event_schema reflect this,
which in turn makes us match the already accurate
openapi spec, so we no longer need to exempt four
types of events from our sanity checks.
We might want to rename the tool to something more
general now, since we are really reconciling three
things:
- node fixtures
- event_schema checkers for test_events
- openapi specs
The way we compare python and openapi schemas is
as follows:
- first convert openapi schemas to be build
from DictType, ListType, etc. with from_opeapi
- do a diff on the schemas
Most of the new code is just having the FooType
family of classes serialize themselves with schema().
Defining types with an object hierarchy
of type classes will allow us to build
functionality that was impossible (or
really janky) with the validators.py
approach of composing functions.
Most of the changes to event_schema.py
were automated search/replaces.
This patch doesn't really yet take
advantage of the new FooType classes,
but we will use it soon to audit our
openapi specs.
Use the validation of the tornado sharding config that
`stage_updated_sharding` does, by depending on it. This ensures that
we don't write out a supervisor or nginx config based on a
bad (e.g. non-sequential) list of tornado ports.
Fingerprinting the config is somewhat brittle -- it requires either
custom bootstrapping for old (fingerprint-less) configs, and may have
false-positives.
Since generating the config is lightweight, do so into the .tmp files,
and compare the output to the originals to determine if there are
changes to apply.
In order to both surface errors, as well as notify the user in case a
restart is necessary, we must run it twice. The `onlyif`
functionality cannot show configuration errors to the user, only
determine if the command runs or not. We thus run the command once,
judging errors as "interesting" enough to run the actual command,
whose failure will be verbose in Puppet and halt any steps that depend
on it.
Removing the `onlyif` would result in `stage_updated_sharding` showing
up in the output of every Puppet run, which obscures the important
messages it displays when an update to sharding is necessary.
Removing the `command` (e.g. making it an `echo`) would result in
removing the ability to report configuration errors. We thus have no
choice but to run it twice; this is thankfully low-overhead.
SimpleBar 6.0.0-beta.2 through -beta.6 are built with ES6 syntax (I
assume inadvertently: https://github.com/Grsmto/simplebar/issues/523),
and its latest tag has moved back to 5.2.1 anyway.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Even before GDPR changes, it was strange that we displayed
users differently for fork events vs. all other events.
After GDPR, we don't even get the `username` field any
more.
So now we simply use `display_name` if available, and then
we try `nickname`.
See https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/bitbucket-api-changes-gdpr/
for more context.
We were trying to share the same format string between
the two different versions of bitbucket, but this only
creates confusion, as the two versions are only close
enough to be confusing.
The format string might be the same, but the semantics
are different, as well as the eventual outputs.
For example, the {username} piece here is simple in version
2, but in version 3 we append a url to the user's name.
Prefer using `assert_called_once` to protect against places where a
mock might be reused, and in so doing have been previously called,
thus making the second usage of `assert_called` not assert anything of
note.
Problems with the card itself should not be logged as errors -- while
perhaps notable in aggregate, they are not worthy of being logged to
Sentry, for instance.
Downgrade these to `info`; continue to log other problems at the
`error` level. This updates tests for this change, and in so doing
corrects a test that does not do its job, due to a missing
`reset_mock`.
This commit renames 'test_message_to_self' and
'test_api_message_to_self' tests to
'test_message_to_stream_by_name' and
'test_api_message_to_stream_by_name' to depict
the actual purpose of these tests.
user_profile will be None for web_public_guests here. Hence, for
settings (of which most be inaccessible by web public guest),
which require a user_profile, we either set an empty value for
them or set them to a default value. This will help render
the frontend or extend support to our clients without breaking
a lot of code.
Tweaked by tabbott to add many comments.
Anders Kaseorg
Alex Vandiver
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
orientor
Wes Galbraith
sahil839
Aman Agrawal