Add a new `verify_signup` helper function, which currently implements
enough functionality to be used by `test_signup_existing_email`.
This is the first step towards #7564.
This is a prep commit in preparation of splitting
create_stream_policy into create_private_stream_policy
and create_public_stream_policy.
This extracts it in a way to make it possible to easily test
different stream policies in the upcoming stream policy split.
This is a prep commit in preparation of splitting
create_stream_policy into create_private_stream_policy
and create_public_stream_policy.
This extracts it in a way to make it possible to easily test
different stream policies in the upcoming stream policy split.
This is a prep commit in preparation of splitting
create_stream_policy into create_private_stream_policy
and create_public_stream_policy.
This extracts it in a way to make it possible to easily test
different stream policies in the upcoming stream policy split.
test_create_stream_policy_setting (in class StreamAdminTest) and
test_user_settings_for_creating_streams (in class SubscriptionAPITest)
test essentially the same thing.
So, remove one of them.
Removing test_create_stream_policy_setting makes sense,
since class StreamAdminTest tests things admins can do, whereas
non-admin users can create streams.
test_invite_to_stream_by_invite_period_threshold (in class StreamAdminTest)
and test_user_settings_for_subscribing_other_users
(in class SubscriptionAPITest) test essentially the same thing.
So, remove one of them.
Removing test_invite_to_stream_by_invite_period_threshold makes sense,
since class StreamAdminTest tests things admins can do, whereas
non-admin users can invite other users.
This was used to test can_create_stream property of a guest user.
There are better ways to test it, which are already implemented in
test_can_create_streams.
This PR adds a basic .md template that is followed by lot of /api
pages. Since we have recently done the migration work to ensure that
our REST API documentation pages for individual endpoints are almost
all identical files following a common pattern, we can now get the
payoff of deleting them all in favor of a shared template.
This removes 2000 lines of somewhat finicky configuration from the
codebase, and thus should save significant effort when documenting new
API endpoints in the future.
The markdown files for endpoints or other pages which deviate from the
standard template remain, and the docs are instead generated from
those files using the existing system.
The returned values of get_path function would be
expanded soon, and defining a dataclass would make
the code cleaner for returning and using the fields.
As a part of goal of moving towards a common template,
the hardcoded python tabs need to be removed to ensure
that endpoints which don't have python examples can be
covered by the common template as well.
This commit also modifies the markdown extension for python
examples to render empty string in case the examples don't
exist, which would allow it to be called whether the endpoint
has python examples or not.
Currently, the message that no parameters are accepted by
the endpoint is displayed if there are no parameters in
OpenAPI data, but it is possible that information is
encoded in x-parameter-description (example in upload-file
endpoint), and we want to display that information rather
than the message.
Added an if condition to check the same.
We use the "does not accept any parameters" language in the common
template that we'll be migrating to shortly, so we remove this
variance (And adjust its test).
This removes some complexity from the event_queue module.
To avoid code duplication, we reduce the `is_notifiable` methods to
internally just call the `trigger` methods and check their return value.
* Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the
dataclass introduced in 951b49c048.
* The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way
which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've
earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e.
So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts
which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion.
* We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message
message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style.
* There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests.
Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted
(5a642cea11).
With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods.
So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was
muted, and the test needs to be updated.
* In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which
generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls,
we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments,
so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives.
* Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events,
we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment
there.
This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into
our new `notification_data` module.
AUTHENTICATION LINE variable needs to be set after each
line executed, but in the current code, it wasn't being
set in endpoints whose files were removed in favour of
the pages being generated directly from OpenAPI data.
Moved the block to set AUTHENTICATION LINE in the loop
which executes each command, which fixes the bug.
While importing a realm, the stream dictionaries in data['zerver_stream']
already contains the field named `rendered_description`, which is set to
`""`. This lead the code to assume that the stream rendered_description
was already set, due to which, it was not setting the rendered_description
field for any stream.
This is a prep commit for adding realm-level default for various
user settings. We add the language, in which the invite email will
be sent, to the dict added to queue itself to avoid making queries
in a loop when sending multiple emails from queue.
We also handle the case for old events in the queue.
We removed the use of email_body field in 47fcb27e39, but was
still passed in events from do_resend_user_invite_email and
in tests. So this commit removes the email_body field from
these places.
As a goal of a common template, there
is a need for a tool to auto-generate
general description for all parameters
directly from OpenAPI data.
This description is to be stored in
x-response-description field, and this
commit adds a markdown extesion to process the same.
As a goal of a common template, there
is a need for a tool to auto-generate
general description for all responses
directly from OpenAPI data.
This description is to be stored in
x-response-description field, and this
commit adds a markdown extesion to process the same.
We already have this data in the `flags` for each user, so no need to
send this set/list in the event dictionary.
The `flags` in the event dict represent the after-message-update state,
so we can't avoid sending `prior_mention_user_ids`.
This is much faster than calling generate_presigned_url each time.
```
In [3]: t = time.time()
...: for i in range(250):
...: x = u.get_public_upload_url("foo")
...: print(time.time()-t)
0.0010945796966552734
```
Fixes#18915
This was very slow, causing performance issues. After investigating,
generate_presigned_url is the cheap part of this, but the
session.client() call is expensive - so that's what we should cache.
Before the change:
```
In [4]: t = time.time()
...: for i in range(250):
...: x = u.get_public_upload_url("foo")
...: print(time.time()-t)
6.408717393875122
```
After:
```
In [4]: t = time.time()
...: for i in range(250):
...: x = u.get_public_upload_url("foo")
...: print(time.time()-t)
0.48990607261657715
```
This is not good enough to avoid doing something ugly like replacing
generate_presigned_url with some manual URL manipulation, but it's a
helpful structure that we may find useful with further refactoring.
Previously, it was possible for an unusual series of topic-edit
actions to result in Notification Bot reporting that a topic was
marked as resolved that had already been marked as resolved, etc.
A buggy client might send a message_edit request to change the topic
field, sending the current topic as the new value. Previously, we
would treat that as a normal request to edit the topic; now we act as
though the API request had not requested a topic change. In the
common case that only the topic was in the edit request, this now
results in an error that should help client implementations identify
their bug.
This fixes a bad interaction with the "unresolve topic" logic, which
assumed that upstream logic had verified that the topic was actually
changing.
We incorrectly include many realm settings in the data section of
'realm/update_dict' schema. It should only contain the settings
related to message edit, realm icon, realm logo and authentication
methods and not other settings, becausea all the other settings send
'realm/update' event and not 'realm/update_dict' event.
This commit only removes 'default_twenty_four_hour_time' and
'default_language', others will be removed separately.