Recently, the need for individual Markdown templates for
every endpoint's OpenAPI page was removed, as they are now
auto-generated from OpenAPI data. Further, as a part of this
migration, several new fields and Markdown extensions were added.
This commit updates the documentation to reflect the changes that
have occured as a result of the migration.
With various edits by tabbott to clarify or simplify the documentation.
`request.client` is no longer valid since the ZulipRequestNotes change.
This update the documentation to reflect that. And it also makes it
recommend `check_send_webhook_message` in favor of
`check_send_stream_message`.
Strictly speaking, this sentence is talking about the IdP configuration,
while the backend is just GenericOpenIdConnectBackend, so the new
phrasing is more correct.
The script is added to upgrade steps for 20.04 and Buster because
those are the upgrades that cross glibc 2.28, which is most
problematic. It will also be called out in the upgrade notes, to
catch those that have already done that upgrade.
Previously, one needed to specifying all the HTTP status
codes that we want to render along with the operation,
but the primary use case just needs the responses of
all the status codes, and not just one.
This commit modifies the Markdown extension to render
all the responses of all status codes of a specified
operation in a loop.
Now that we are starting to link this pages from the landing page's
top navigation, it makes sense to have proper backlinks to the
homepage so that there is some continuity when the user clicks on
a link that takes them to a ReadTheDocs page from the main website.
I heard with a new contributor that they were really confused by this
page, and I believe the key problem was that we didn't define the
somewhat technical term "linter".
We extracted a bunch of code into the common notification_data.py
module, with a data class managing a lot of the logic; this updates
the documentation to cover that.
Fixes#17277.
The main limitation of this implementation is that the sync happens if
the user authing already exists. This means that a new user going
through the sign up flow will not have their custom fields synced upon
finishing it. The fields will get synced on their consecutive log in via
SAML in the future. This can be addressed in the future by moving the
syncing code further down the codepaths to login_or_register_remote_user
and plumbing the data through to the user creation process.
We detail that limitation in the documentation.