Logic for checking if the last message in the current table is visible was
already written in message_viewport.js; Code in notifications.js is changed
to reduce redundancy.
We are trying to carve room for a more specific
"user_status" concept, which refers to statuses
that users specifically set, like "I'm away".
So we call this function "update_presence_info",
which reflects that it's more about actual
"presence"--i.e. the user really is present
in the browser, even though the actual human
may not want to be disturbed.
The current user gets excluded from all non-empty
searches, even ones that match the user, since
it can look funny when the user's at the top of a
search, and you'd never need to search for yourself
(again, since the current user is at the top of
the buddy list).
Apparently, we didn't have one of these, and thus had a moderate
number of generally very old violations in the codebase. Fix this and
clear the ones that exist..
We move all of its logic into settings_sections.
Note that this is slightly more than a refactor.
We are slightly more aggressive about resetting
sections. For example, if you go into Settings,
then exit the overlay, then go into Manage
Organization, we will now reset sections for both
groups.
We now rely on set_up() methods to call their
own module-specific versions of maybe_disable_widgets()
in the codepath for admin_sections.load_admin_section().
And then for live updates, we just explicitly call
all four modules that support maybe_disable_widgets().
This should make switching between sections slightly faster,
and it also reduces the risk of module A messing with
module B's state. (Granted, we have lots of other ways
that modules can mess with each other's state.)
Bootstrap's typeahead is the main part of the project that we've
forked, and moving it to its own module should help unlock our ability
to upgrade bootstrap itself.
This form isn't actively used, which is how it ended up broken, but it
basically didn't display its content properly at all.
Convert it to use our standard white-box framework.
This still doesn't look great in various ways, but it's at least not
obviously totally busted now.
Since we're adding this to a large number of portico pages, there's no
guarantee that these pages actually have a CSRF input.
Though given that the logout template contains a CSRF input,
realistically it should always be present.
We weren't using the actual sorted data to find
the last element. This probably worked by accident
in some cases, but this commit makes it more
deterministic.
We want the return value from this for the next
commit, so we no longer call `format_drafts` indirectly
from `populate_and_fill`, and we rename the latter
to `render_widgets`.
We had an anonymous callback for drafts that was
hard to read. It's much easier to flatten the code,
give functions actual names, and stub them as needed
in the unit tests.
Since we're adding this to a large number of portico pages, there's no
guarantee that these pages actually have a CSRF input.
Though given that the logout template contains a CSRF input,
realistically it should always be present.
If a user has an old mention and has since been renamed, there's
really nothing for us to do to render it; we should just return as
though we have no data.
Fix an issue that when a message is being edited, sometimes compose
options are hidden if there is no time limit. Also, move the options
further from the time limit to make them more noticeable.
Fix#11056.
The `replying_to_message` field was used in some
early versions of compose fade, but it has no more
use in the current code.
The drafts implementation didn't really make any sense,
anyway, as we were claiming to reply to the same
message we were drafting.
A common source of confusion for new users is sending a message when
you're scrolled up in the message feed; in this case, it's nice to
communicate to the user why the message is not in view.
Fixes#10792.
Restructured by tabbott to replace overly complex logic for getting
the position of the new message with a `message_list.get_row()` call.
Now, we correctly avoid calling various password quality/strength
functions in the registration flow in the event that there isn't a
password form on the current page.
Before, some code wasn't inside a block at all, while other code was
using an incorrect check (an empty jQuery object is not falsey).
The overall result was that this would often crash on certain
pages/flows, stopping JS execution and causing various secondary
problems.
The first bug fixed here has been around for a long
time--we were redundantly updating unread counts
indirectly via muting_ui.initialize(). The
unread counts also get updated in
unread_ui.initialize(), when we have more valid
state. (And it's worth noting here that the unread
counts get updated yet again once message fetches
complete.)
The second bug was a very recent regression from
my recent stream name -> stream id cleanup in the
muting system. We now depend on stream_data to
initialize muting data, so we need to initialize
muting.js slightly later in the process.
These fixes are intertwined, because they were both
somewhat caused by the anti-pattern of having
muting_ui.js initialize unread_ui.js and muting.js,
instead of doing more direct, fine-grained initialization
from ui_init.js.
Essentially we replace this code:
exports.update_muted_topics = function (muted_topics) {
muting.set_muted_topics(muted_topics);
unread_ui.update_unread_counts();
};
with this:
exports.initialize = function () {
exports.set_muted_topics(page_params.muted_topics);
};
And the modules load like this:
stream_data
...
muting
...
unread_ui
And we don't need any page-load initialization for muting_ui,
which is mostly used for Settings/Muted topics.
This function used to be called initialize_from_page_params(),
and we called it indirectly through `subs.js`.
Now we call it directly from `ui_init.js`, which gives us a
bit more control over how things are initialized. In fact,
this sets us up for the next commit, where I fix a recent
regression I introduced.
The data attribute here has some value if you're
inspecting the HTML in the browser, but it's not
worth the extra code.
All the list items have data-stream-id, so there's
no need for the parent to have it.