This should help protect us from future issues with the way that
`bulk_get_users` does caching.
It's likely that we'll want to further restructure `bulk_get_users` to
not have this base_query code path altogether (since it's kinda
buggy), but I'm going to defer that for a time when we have another
user.
The previous implementation had a subtle caching bug: because it was
sharing its cache with the `get_user_profile_by_email` cache, if a
user happened to have an email in that cache, we'd return it, even
though that user didn't match `base_query`.
This causes `get_cross_realm_users` to no longer have a problematic
caching bug.
Hides URL if the message content == image url so that sending gifs or
images feels less cluttered. Uses the url_to_a() function to generate
the expected url string for matching.
Fixes#7324.
Appends "Test: " text to some tests to make changes to the image preview
rendering. In the future, if the message is only a link to an image,
the link will be hidden.
We include ERROR_BOT in this set, even though it's not technically
cross-realm (it just lives in the admin realm).
This code path does not correctly handle emails that correspond to
multiple accounts (because `get_system_bot` does not). Since it's
intended to only be used by system bots, we add an appropriate
assertion to ensure it is only used for system bots.
This was causing problems, because internal_send_message assumes that
there is a unique user (across all realms) with the given email
address (which is sorta required to support cross-realm bot messages
the way it does).
With this change, it now, in practice, only sends cross-realm bot
messages.
We now ignore payloads where payload['push']['changes'] is empty,
because an empty push doesn't really convey any useful information.
I couldn't find a way to replicate the action that would generate
such a payload, so I took one of our existing payloads and editted
out payload['push']['changes'] myself, so this payload is not
authentic.
Previously, this was a ValidationError, but that doesn't really make
sense, since this condition reflects an actual bug in the code.
Because this happened to be our only test coverage the ValidationError
catch on line 84 of registration.py, we add nocoverage there for now.
This buggy logic from e1686f427c had
broken do-destroy-rebuild-test-database.
Now that we're not just trying to add the Recipient objects for every
user on the system here to profiles_by_id, we also shouldn't be
processing every Recipeint object on the system. The fix is simple:
because of the patch we got merged into Django upstream,
recipients_to_create actually has the object IDs added to the
Recipient objects passed into Recipient.objects.bulk_create.
This was missed in manual testing, since it only broke `populate_db
--test-suite`.
An Integration object doesn't need access to the context dict used
to render its doc.md, since the context dict is just passed directly to
render_markdown_path.
Previously, when rendering a single integration, we tacked on the
following information to the context dict that was redundant:
* An OrderedDict containing all of the Integration objects for
all integrations.
* An OrderedDict containing all of the integration categories.
The context dict for rendering a particular integration doc would
contain 4 OrderedDicts, 2 for categories, 2 for Integration objects
because of how many times add_integrations_context had been called.
This was very wasteful, since an Integration object doesn't need
to access any other Integration object (or itself for that matter)
to render its documentation. This commit adds a function that
allows us to only pass in the context values that are necessary.
This is checked for in the caller of OurAuthenticationForm, which
meant this code was never run. But it is worth having an assertion
here to catch any possible regressions.
Structurally, the main change here is replacing the `clean_username`
function, which would get called when one accessed
self.cleaned_data['username'] with code in the main `clean` function.
This is important because only in `clean` do we have access to the
`realm` object.
Since I recently added full test coverage on this form, we know each
of the major cases have a test; the error messages are unchanged.
Tim Abbott
Rohitt Vashishtha
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu Ks
Robert Hönig
Rhea Parekh
Vaibhav Sagar
Andy Perez
Tommy Ip
Harshit Bansal
rht