Right now we have buttons for "New conversation" and "New private message"
in different views, but both buttons do the same thing.
The current state is confusing for new users, since there is already a lot
of terminology one needs to learn in order to understand the Zulip
conversation model. It's very plausible a user would think a "conversation"
is something different from a "private message" or a "topic".
The UI does not allow you to send a message to a stream you're not
subscribed to, even if the API does.
And since it's clear any member of the organization can join and then send,
there's no real harm in giving the simpler explanation.
When archiving Messages, we stop relying on LEFT JOIN ... IS NULL to
avoid duplicates when INSERTing. Instead we use ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
(added in postgresql 9.5) to, in case of archiving a Message that
already has a corresponding archived objects (this happens if a Message
gets archived, restored and then archived again), re-assign the existing
ArchivedMessage to the new transaction.
This also allows us to fix test_archiving_messages_second_time, which
was temporarily disable a few commits before.
We combine run_message_batch_query and run_archiving_in_chunks
functions, which makes the code simpler and more readable - we get rid
of hacky generator usage, for example.
In the process, move_expired_messages_* functions are adjusted, and now
they archive Messages as well as their related objects.
Appropriate adjustments in reaction to this are made in the main
archiving functions which call move_expired_messages_* (they no longer
need to call move_related_objects_to_archive).
Instead of having a bunch of custom code in the function, we make it use
run_message_batch_query and run_archiving_in_chunks to do the necessary
operations in a consistent way, using the same codepaths as the rest of
the archiving system.
This breaks test_archiving_messages_second_time temporarily, but we will
fix it and re-enable the test in the next commits, where we'll address
various other issues with re-archiving of messages.
We also remove the @transaction.atomic wrapper, because atomicity is
handled by the logic inside run_archiving_in_chunks.
We add a new model, ArchiveTransaction, to tie archived objects together
in a coherent way, according to the batches in which they are archived.
This enables making a better system for restoring from archive, and it
seems just more sensible to tie the archived objects in this way, rather
the somewhat vague setting of archive_timestamp to each object using
timezone_now().
Since we no longer support Ubuntu Trusty, we no longer need this
backwards-compatibility cruft (which we only kept around to avoid
randomizing configuration for existing systems).
This was only used in Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty.
Removing this also finally lets us simplify our security model
discussion of uploaded files.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Now that we have a system for storing HTTP headers for each integration, we
should fix the send_all button. Previously, it used the same user entered
custom HTTP header (from the GUI) for all of the fixtures, but now we
automatically determine the header with the new system instead.
For storing HTTP headers as a function of fixture name, previously
we required that the fixture_to_headers method should reside in a
separate module called headers.py.
However, as in many cases, this method will only take a few lines,
we decided to move this function into the view.py file of the
integration instead of requiring a whole new file called headers.py
This commit introduces the small change in the system architecture,
migrates the GitHub integration, and updates the docs accordingly.
In the GitHub integration we established that for many integrations,
we can directly map the fixture filename to the set of required
headers and by following a simple naming convention we can greatly
ease the logic involved in fixture_to_headers method required .
So to prevent the need for duplicating the logic used by the GitHub
integration, we created a method called `get_http_headers_from_filename`
which will take the name of the HTTP header (key) and then return a
corresponding method (in a decorator-like fashion) which could then be
equated to fixture_to_headers in headers.py.
The GitHub integration was modified to use this method and the docs
were updated to suggest using this when possible.
With the help of `check_property_changed` function now we collect the data
whose values are changed from the current one. Currently this optimizes
only for those elements whose values are collected by
`populate_data_for_request` function i.e. it doesn't optimize data
collected by `get_complete_data_for_subsection`.
This is preliminary commit which moves `populate_data_for_request` function
down after the definition of all functions with which it will interact in
the future.
This is a preliminary commit which refactors `populate_data_for_request`
function, now this function traverse on all "property elements" of a given
subsection, but get the data only of those properties which have
`setting-widget-type` data attribute. Therefore, it doesn't change the
functionality of this function and overall changes don't make any
difference. In upcoming commits, we're going to use `input_elem` as an
argument to `check_property_changed` function, so that only those elements
whose values are changed are sent to the backend.
This moves `get_subsection_property_elements` out from the local context of
`settings_org.build_page` function, as it was unnecessarily initialized at
the time of page setup.
This fixes the mis-alphabetized `fluid_layout_width` at few places in
the codebase, along with that it also fixes sorting order of
`property_types` dictionary in models.py and few model fields of
`UserProfile` model class.
This way we inherit more of the upstream command’s behavior.
Importantly, this means we pass everything in `opts.spargs` to the
spider, not just `opts.spargs.skip_external`.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This concerns the part where the message viewport is scrolled in
order to keep the message content and edit box textarea at the same
vertical position.
Earlier calculations involved use of `.message_top_line`. Similar
adjustments can be made using only the message_content (which also
makes the calculation simpler).
These elements include:
* Stream description in the subscription overlay
* sidebar and
* stream settings
* Custom profile fields with rendered MD content
Anders Kaseorg
Rishi Gupta
Rishi Gupta
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
Hemanth V. Alluri
Pragati Agrawal
Eeshan Garg
Vaibhav