We follow the naming convention.
I also arbitrarily assign the "op" of
"add" to the attachment event, even
though we don't meaningfully test it.
The situation with attachment from the
dispatch test point of view is that
we just want to test that the one line
of code that calls into attachments_ui
(for all three ops) does get dispatched
correctly. We eventually want to get
deeper coverage there, but attachments_ui
wasn't written in the most test-friendly
way. I think it might actually be easy
to fix up attachments_ui to make it a
bit easier to test, but it's out of the
scope of my current PR.
The benefit here is check-node-fixtures
now gives a more concrete plan for
moving schemas to event_schema.py.
We extract test_realm_emojis, and we make
the name of the event more explicit (adding
the __update suffix).
We also add the "op" of "update" here, which
is sort of a quirk of the api, since we don't
actually have alternatives like add/remove,
and therefore the current frontend code doesn't
look at the "op", and thus the original tests
never had to provide a correct value for it.
ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
With update_emojis, it is pretty easy
to set up the tests with reasonable
data without reaching into internal
data structures.
Also, we can begin the process of
sharing the same data with our
dispatch tests (upcoming).
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
With this implementation of the feature of the automatic theme
detection, we make the following changes in the backend, frontend and
documentation.
This replaces the previous night_mode boolean with an enum, with the
default value being to use the prefers-color-scheme feature of the
operating system to determine which theme to use.
Fixes: #14451.
Co-authored-by: @kPerikou <44238834+kPerikou@users.noreply.github.com>
Two things were broken here:
* we were using name(s) instead of id(s)
* we were always sending lists that only
had one element
Now we just send "stream_id" instead of "subscriptions".
If anything, we should start sending a list of users
instead of a list of streams. For example, see
the code below:
if peer_user_ids:
for new_user_id in new_user_ids:
event = dict(type="subscription", op="peer_add",
stream_id=stream.id,
user_id=new_user_id)
send_event(realm, event, peer_user_ids)
Note that this only affects the webapp, as mobile/ZT
don't use this.
Fixes#15285
This event will be used more now for guest users when moving
topic between streams (See #15277). So, instead of deleting
messages in the topic as part of different events which is
very slow and a bad UX, we now handle the messages to delete in
bulk which is a much better UX.
We now use the real implementation of
`stream_data` in our tests (as well as `people`),
while still just checking stubs for "heavier"
functions that we dispatch to.
Also, we use our regular blueslip helpers.
These are basically shims for some deeper refactorings.
I basically just try to make the code express the
problems more clearly:
- use stream_name instead of sub
- make early-exit more explicit
- make it clear that add_subscriber needlessly
requires a name
- make it clear we have an unnecessary loop
I also fixed some phony data in the test.
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
MariaGkoulta
Aman Agrawal