This uses a more specific type `_StrPromise` to replace `Promise`
providing typing information for lazy translation strings.
In places where the callee evaluates the `_StrPromise` object in all
cases we simply force the evaluation with `str()`. This includes
`JsonableError` that ends up handled by the error handler middleware,
and `internal_send_stream_message` that depends on `check_stream_topic`,
requiring the `topic` to be evaluated anyway. In other siuations, the
callee is expected to be able to handle `StrPromise` explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
The only caller that passes the kwargs argument is the avatar rest_path.
The application of kwargs can be rewritten with a wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Now that we can assume Python 3.6+, we can use the
email.headerregistry module to replace hacky manual email address
parsing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The `RateLimited` exception can be caught by `JsonErrorHandler`, so it
is not necessary to have the try...except statement here. It is also invalid
to pass a string to initialize `RateLimited`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Due to an incorrect authorization check in Zulip Server 5.4 and
earlier, a member of an organization could craft an API call that
grants organization administrator privileges to one of their bots.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This change ensures that we can call the validate and update helper for
custom profile data later.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Conceptually, we're clearly intending to check whether the user we're
mutating is the last realm owner. The preexisting code was safe
because we've already checked that the target user is an owner, and
thus if we're the last owner, we're the target user.
This commit attempts to add the backend support by extending the
/json/bots/{bot_id}/ url support to accept the role field as a
parameter. This was previously already possible via
`/json/users/{user_id}`, so this change just simplifies client
implementation.
This is an important design detail, so we document this aspect of
creating users via both the management command and API code paths with
an explicit parameter value and comment.
This commit refactors get_user_by_email function
to use access_user_by_email which is similar to
already existing access_user_by_id and thus using
get_user_data function added recently.
We also remove the unnecessary check for email as
email will always be passed to this endpoint.
Preparatory commit for #10970.
This commit adds get_user_data which is called by
get_members_backend to compute the client_gravatar
value and then return the data of a single user or
all accessible users.
This function will also be used by get_user_by_email
in further commtis.
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
We restrict access of messages from web public streams if
anonymous login is disabled via `enable_spectator_access`.
Display of `Anonymous login` button is now controlled by
the value of `enable_spectator_access`.
Admins can toggle `enable_spectator_access` via org settings in UI.
If realm is web_public, spectators can now view avatar of other
users.
There is a special exception we had to introduce in rest model to
allow `/avatar` type of urls for `anonymous` access, because they
don't have the /api/v1 prefix.
Fixes#19838.
* Remove unnecessary json_validator for full_name parameter.
* Update frontend to pass the right parameter.
* Update documentation and note the change.
Fixes#18409.
We pass allow_realm_admin as True to access_stream_by_id for
`GET users/{user_id}/subscriptions{stream_id}` endpoint
because we want to allow non-subscribed admins to get
subscription status in private streams.
Fixes#19077.
None of the existing custom profile field types have the value as an
integer like declared in many places - nor is it a string like currently
decalred in types.py. The correct type is Union[str, List[int]]. Rather
than tracking this in so many places throughout the codebase, we add a
new ProfileDataElementValue type and insert it where appropriate.
JsonableError has two major benefits over json_error:
* It can be raised from anywhere in the codebase, rather than
being a return value, which is much more convenient for refactoring,
as one doesn't potentially need to change error handling style when
extracting a bit of view code to a function.
* It is guaranteed to contain the `code` property, which is helpful
for API consistency.
Various stragglers are not updated because JsonableError requires
subclassing in order to specify custom data or HTTP status codes.
django.utils.translation.ugettext is a deprecated alias of
django.utils.translation.gettext as of Django 3.0, and will be removed
in Django 4.0.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This makes it much more clear that this feature does JSON encoding,
which previously was only indicated in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Add new rest api endpoint GET users/{email} for looking up a user by
email, which is useful especially for corporate API applications that
might already have a user's email address.
Fixes#14302.
zerver/lib/users.py has a function named access_user_by_id, which is
used in /users views to fetch a user by it's id. Along with fetching
the user this function also does important validations regarding
checking of required permissions for fetching the target user.
In an attempt to solve the above problem this commit introduces
following changes:
1. Make all the parameters except user_profile, target_user_id
to be keyword only.
2. Use for_admin parameter instead of read_only.
3. Adds a documentary note to the function describing the reason for
changes along with recommended way to call this function in future.
4. Changes in views and tests to call this function in this changed
format.
Changes were tested using ./tools/test-backend.
Fixes#17111.
Allowing any admins to create arbitrary users is not ideal because it
can lead to abuse issues. We should require something stronger that
requires the server operator's approval and thus we add a new
can_create_users permission.
This adds 'user_id' to the simple success response for 'POST /users'
api endpoint, to make it convenient for API clients to get details
about users they just created. Appropriate changes have been made in
the docs and test_users.py.
Fixes#16072.
A few major themes here:
- We remove short_name from UserProfile
and add the appropriate migration.
- We remove short_name from various
cache-related lists of fields.
- We allow import tools to continue to
write short_name to their export files,
and then we simply ignore the field
at import time.
- We change functions like do_create_user,
create_user_profile, etc.
- We keep short_name in the /json/bots
API. (It actually gets turned into
an email.)
- We don't modify our LDAP code much
here.
When you post to /json/users, we no longer
require or look at the short_name parameter,
since we don't use it in any meaningful way.
An upcoming commit will eliminate it from the
database.
Update the REQ check for profile_data in
update_user_backend by tweaking `check_profile_data`
to use `check_dict_only`.
Here is the relevant URL:
path('users/<int:user_id>', rest_dispatch,
{'GET': 'zerver.views.users.get_members_backend',
It would be nice to unify the validator
for these two views, but they are different:
update_user_backend
update_user_custom_profile_data
It's not completely clear to me why update_user_backend
seems to support a superset of the functionality
of `update_user_custom_profile_data`, but it has
this code to allow you to remove custom profile fields:
clean_profile_data = []
for entry in profile_data:
assert isinstance(entry["id"], int)
if entry["value"] is None or not entry["value"]:
field_id = entry["id"]
check_remove_custom_profile_field_value(target, field_id)
else:
clean_profile_data.append({
"id": entry["id"],
"value": entry["value"],
})
Whereas the other view is much simpler:
def update_user_custom_profile_data(
<snip>
) -> HttpResponse:
validate_user_custom_profile_data(user_profile.realm.id, data)
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed(user_profile, data)
# We need to call this explicitly otherwise constraints are not check
return json_success()