If `invite_as` is passed as a number outside the range of a PostgreSQL
`SMALLINT` field, the database throws an exception. Move this exception
to the glass as a validation error to allow better client-side error
handling and reduce database round-trips.
Moves files in `templates/zerver/help/include` that are used
specifically for integrations documentation to be in a new
directory: `templates/zerver/integrations/include`.
Adds a boolean parameter to `render_markdown_path` to be used
for integrations documentation pages.
Track `create_realm` and `new_realm_send_confirm` using
google analytics.
This will help us track number of users who want to
create a new Zulip organization.
This allows us to revoke MultiUseInvites by changing their .status
instead of deleting them (which has been deleting the helpful tracking
information on PreregistrationUsers about which MultiUseInvite they came
from).
There was the following bug here:
1. Send an email invite to a user.
2. Have the user sign up via social auth without going through that
invite, meaning either going via a multiuse invite link or just
straight-up Sign up if the org permissions allow.
That resulted in the PreregistrationUser that got generated in step (1)
having 2 Confirmations tied to it - because maybe_send_to_registration
grabbed the object and created a new confirmation link for it. That is a
corrupted state, Confirmation is supposed to be unique.
One could try to do fancy things with checking whether a
PreregistrationUser already have a Confirmation link, but to avoid races
between ConfirmationEmailWorker and maybe_send_to_registration, this
would require taking locks and so on - which gets needlessly
complicated. It's simpler to not have them compete for the same object.
The point of the PreregistrationUser re-use in
maybe_send_to_registration is that if an admin invites a user, setting
their initial streams and role, it'd be an annoying experience if the
user ends up signing up not via the invite and those initial streams
streams etc. don't get set up. But to handle this, we can just copy the
relevant values from the pre-existing prereg_user, rather than re-using
the object itself.
This line was added in 94e099eaab,
presumably because of the
del request.session["multiuse_object_key"]
line that was just above it.
Looks like it should have been removed in
868a763cec, which eliminated that `del`
operation.
In 1fce1c3c73, we added logic to parse
the User-Agent in /register requests; this logic crashed if an HTTP request
was missing that header.
Includes a test for `/register` with no user agent passed; this should catch
similar regressions in the future.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
We use `templates/zerver/api/api-doc-template.md` as a base template
for the documented API endpoints in `zerver/openapi/zulip.yaml`.
Previously, if this template was called as an endpoint, then it
would fail an assertion check and send server error. Now we check
for specifically for that potential path and return a 404 error
response for no existing article.
Fixes#21876.
Mobile clients older than v27.192 do not support PRONOUNS type
custom profile fields, so we instead change the type of it to
SHORT_TEXT in the data sent with register response and also in
the events sent to those clients.
The previous error page was inadequate for serving the two different
scenarios where we show errors in realm_creations, in particular
containing a misleading sentence about realm creation being disabled
(even in the case where it was actually enabled and the user simply had
an expired link).
The query in display_in_profile_summary_limit_reached should check
realm also since there is per-realm limit of 2 fields, otherwise
this will cause issues where multiple realms are hosted on the
same server.
Fixes#23368.
This was broken by commit b945aa3443
(#22604), because email_to_domain implicitly lowercased the result.
No adjustment is needed for is_disposable_domain, which already
lowercases its argument.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Previously we did not send notification for topic-only edits.
Now, we add backend support for sending notification to topic-only
edits as well.
We would add support for this in webapp in further commits since
message edit UI will be updated as well. We just make sure that no
notifications are sent when editing topic using pencil icon in
message header.
We also change the API default for moving a topic to only notify the
new location, not the old one; this matches the current defaults in
the web UI.
Includes many tests.
We also update the puppeteer tests to test only content edit as
we are going to change the UI to not allow topic editing from
message edit UI. Also fixing the existing tests to pass while
doing topic edits is somewhat complex as notification message
is also sent to new topic by default.
Fixes#21712.
Co-authored-by: Aman Agrawal <amanagr@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This commit adds the OPTIONAL .realm attribute to Message
(and ArchivedMessage), with the server changes for making new Messages
have this set. Old Messages still have to be migrated to backfill this,
before it can be non-nullable.
Appropriate test changes to correctly set .realm for Messages the tests
manually create are included here as well.
Previously, we included all three message edit related settings
("allow_message_editing", "message_content_edit_limit_seconds" and
"edit_topic_policy") in the event data and api response irrespective
of which of these settings were changed. Now, we only include changed
settings and separate events are sent for each setting if more than
one of them is changed.
Note that the previous typed in event_schema.py for
`message_content_edit_limit_seconds` incorrectly did not allow `None`
as a value, which is used to encode no limit.
Unfortunately, doing so requires forking common API documentation
text, since we're not making any changes to other endpoints that don't
allow unauthenticated requests at all.
Follow-up on #21995.
We need to move this function to a separate actions file specifically
for `user_status` because otherwise we will have a circular import
between `actions/user_settings.py` and `actions/presence.py` in an
upcoming commit.
Prep commit for migrating "unavailable" user status feature to
"invisible" user presence feature.
Fixes#22821.
As explained in the comment in the code:
Topics can be large enough that this request will inevitably time out.
In such a case, it's good for some progress to be accomplished, so that
full deletion can be achieved by repeating the request. For that purpose,
we delete messages in atomic batches, committing after each batch.
The additional perk is that the ordering of messages should prevent some
hypothetical deadlocks - ref #19054