If we get a topic change, we can change the subject outside the
loop, since we are passed in event.orig_subject. Doing it inside
the loop was mostly harmless, since after you encountered the first
message with the old topic, the condition to change the subject
evaluated to false, but it was still technically O(N), and it was
kind of confusing.
This commit changes behavior in the edge case that you have the
compose box open for a changing subject, but you are in a narrow
that does not have any of the affected messages. After this commit,
the topic in the compose box will still change, which I believe
is the correct behavior.
(imported from commit 2363e432ebe7ae8e07379324ee0bfb52051428e6)
Before this change, we were incorrectly trying to do local
filtering on negated has searches.
(imported from commit d1a6f1feef6b3cc1c984eb91a73cd16c4e66874e)
We use this error page for all 5xx errors, so I'm removing the error
number from the text.
(imported from commit c0c4c8829d466dd20c76dbbc920fc57cafbd6e6c)
We still don't show this in the frontend, aside from our usual "Not
delivered" message that we also show when you send to a non-existent
user.
Addresses #2349
(imported from commit 2f348b15a4d539987ddbcccbbf40e2be87c1f92d)
We show a user as "on mobile" if:
* They are only active on mobile
* They are inactive on all devices and can receive push notifications
(imported from commit 0510b9371727cd19c72f6990df7112921c36ad48)
This doesn't affect code when not in testing. It shaves 7 seconds off of casper
test time on my machine.
(imported from commit 7e27fa781bcf16f36d9c8f058427ba57c41068bd)
Normally, casper delays checking the waitFor condition for 100 milliseconds and
further does not act on that check for another 100 milliseconds. This is just
silly.
(imported from commit ad046ceda81abda5c609ce25ef0d4fb27d3da716)
send_message -> then_send_message
send_many -> then_send_many
wait_and_send -> then_wait_and_send
Hopefully this makes it clearer that they should not be called inside of steps.
(imported from commit 4fcc971817b25056100311ba55303da2c5527f0f)
Casper was calling casper.then(then) instead of calling the callback directly.
This meant that the callback was being added as a step, which worked, but was
not consistent with the rest of the casper model.
(imported from commit b3bf916f7c56dd3d4e7be3569ebdf9d3045cd085)
This speeds up CasperJS tests by 25 seconds per main app page load.
When we switched the SockJS, the casper tests got inexplicably slower. I
finially figured out what's going on. The first SockJS XHR request (remember
that we don't get websockets in the test suite) gets considered part of the page
load and therefore the PhantomJS onLoadFinished handler doesn't get called until
the SockJS XHR finishes, which happens at the heartbeat, 25 seconds later. To
fix this, we simply don't create the SockJS object on page load since it will be
created on demand, anyway.
(imported from commit 845a97526c5102df426cd6fc26182a734e7fcab6)
Catch any exceptions that happen in the process of triggering
the message_rendered.zulip event. This addresses #2356.
(imported from commit ce771483cd2533d312fbd68e9c2753c80b3c8d49)
Our restructuring of the messages (especially grouping) seems to be the culprit for message copy and paste
(imported from commit 14632a67f55efea4f1b53cc718a4f655ac83b387)
This will make it slightly easier to consume the data from our clients.
Ref:
RFC 6585 §4
(imported from commit 6d323dc25db78a6d84a163add950f039e03e73d3)
This addresses #2351. While I could see the argument for
wanting to edit a message without changing your selection,
I think it's just very surprising behavior and inconsistent
with the rest of the UI.
(imported from commit 3bb4faca0656258b76bfaafbd7f4a645810578f6)
Steve Howell
Allen Rabinovich
Tim Abbott
Luke Faraone
Waseem Daher
Zev Benjamin
acrefoot
Jessica McKellar
Leo Franchi