This commit updates 'test_user_ids_unmuting_topic' to make
an api_post call to '/api/v1/user_topics' instead of
calling the internal function 'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy'
to verify the logic.
This commit adds a new endpoint, 'POST /user_topics' which
is used to update the personal preferences for a topic.
Currently, it is used to update the visibility policy of
a user-topic row.
Primary goal of library replacement is improving execution speed.
This commit should not affect the functionality of the system
or make any changes to it.
Previously, there was a stale code that didn't verify
if 'muted_topics' and 'user_topic' events are sent correctly.
This commit updates the test to verify if the expected
users are notified via 'muted_topics' and 'user_topic'
events.
This commit updates the move-topic codepath to perform
bulk database operations on the UserTopic record using
user_profiles for each visibility_policy instead of
previously looping over each user_profile one by one.
This commit refactors 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to perform bulk database operations and the related changes.
There is an increase in database query count because requests
to delete user_topic rows now take two queries instead of one.
This is required for logging the info for a request to delete
a non-existent user_topic row while performing bulk operations
at the same time.
The overall query count will be lower while performing
bulk operations (multiple user_profiles instead of one).
This commit updates the 'do_update_message' codepath to
update the UserTopic records regardless of visibility policy
during the "move-topic" operation.
This is required before offering new visibility policies
in the UI.
Previously, UserTopic records were moved or deleted only
for objects with a MUTED visibility policy.
Fixes: #24574
This is a prep commit that renames 'set_topic_mutes' and
'topic_is_muted' to 'set_topic_visibility_policy' and
'topic_has_visibility_policy' respectively, and refactors
them to work with any visibility_policy, not only MUTED.
Previously, tests that exercised code paths that added local
uploads did not always clean up `settings.LOCAL_UPLOADS_DIR`
after the test was complete.
Updates the `ZulipTestCase` class to remove any local uploads
in the unique `settings.LOCAL_UPLOADS_DIR` in `tearDown` for
all tests.
This commit adds code to create a "Nobody" system user group
to realms which will be used in settings to represent "Nobody"
option.
We also add a migration to add this group to existing realms.
This commit adds a new helper submit_realm_creation_form,
similar to existing submit_reg_form_for_user, to avoid
duplicate code for creating realms in tests.
In previous commits, we updated the realm creation flow to show
the realm name, type and subdomain fields in the first form
when asking for the email of the user. This commit updates the
user registration form to show the already filled realm details
as non-editable text and there is also a button to edit the
realm details before registration.
We also update the sub-heading for user registration form as
mentioned in the issue.
Fixes part of #24307.
We now use PreregistrationRealm objects in registration_helper
function when creating new realms instead of PreregistrationUser
objects.
Fixes part of #24307.
Previously, when a user moves a message to another topic, the Notification
bot will post a message saying "This topic was moved here from..." This is
confusing when the topic already contains messages. The changes aims to make
the messages more clear by changing the logic for the Notification bot. When
there is already messages in the topic, the bot will post "A message was
moved here from..." or "N messages were moved here from...". The bot will
post "This topic was moved here from (somewhere) by (someone)." when the
topic is empty.
Fixes#23267.
"check_add_user_group" is a safer helper function than
"create_user_group" to use when creating user_groups. It does
error handling and notify the client with the appropriate event.
Note that the populate_db command still uses "create_user_group"
because we do not need to enqueue events at that point.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since this function creates a new user group into the database,
it is more appropriate to have it not as a generic "lib" function
but as an "action".
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Prior to commit a9b3a9c, the server implementation for documented
search operators with dashes, also implicitly supported clients
sending those same operators with underscores. This has been the
case sense the server side support for narrow filtering was
introduced in commit 3af2bf345a.
Updates the stricter version of mapping operator strings to `by*`
functions, to also include the underscore version of any operators
that have dashes. Adds a note that these undocumented versions are
tied to the support for the documented versions.
We previously created RealmAuditLog entries for user notification
settings only. This commit changes the code to create entries for
all user settings. We cannot backfill the entries since we don't
have the data to do that.
When a new realm is created, a notification message is sent to
the realm configured as the settings.SYSTEM_BOT_REALM if there
is a "signups" stream that exists in that realm. This is used
for Zulip Cloud, but is an undocumented feature.
The topic of the message has been the subdomain of the new realm,
and the message content has been "Signups enabled" translated
into the default language of the new realm.
In order to make these messages more explicitly for Zulip Cloud,
the settings.CORPORATE_ENABLED is checked before sending these
messages.
To make these messages more useful, the topic for these
notifications is changed to be "new organizations". The content
of these messages is updated to have the new realm name (with a
link to the admin realm's activity support page for the realm),
subdomain (with a link to the realm), and organization type.
`render_markdown_path` renders Markdown, and also (since baff121115)
runs Jinja2 on the resulting HTML.
The `pure_markdown` flag was added in 0a99fa2fd6, and did two
things: retried the path directly in the filesystem if it wasn't found
by the Jinja2 resolver, and also skipped the subsequent Jinja2
templating step (regardless of where the content was found). In this
context, the name `pure_markdown` made some sense. The only two
callsites were the TOS and privacy policy renders, which might have
had user-supplied arbitrary paths, and we wished to handle absolute
paths in addition to ones inside `templates/`.
Unfortunately, the follow-up of 01bd55bbcb did not refactor the
logic -- it changed it, by making `pure_markdown` only do the former
of the two behaviors. Passing `pure_markdown=True` after that commit
still caused it to always run Jinja2, but allowed it to look elsewhere
in the filesystem.
This set the stage for calls, such as the one introduced in
dedea23745, which passed both a context for Jinja2, as well as
`pure_markdown=True` implying that Jinja2 was not to be used.
Split the two previous behaviors of the `pure_markdown` flag, and use
pre-existing data to control them, rather than an explicit flag. For
handling policy information which is stored at an absolute path
outside of the template root, we switch to using the template search
path if and only if the path is relative. This also closes the
potential inconsistency based on CWD when `pure_markdown=True` was
passed and the path was relative, not absolute.
Decide whether to run Jinja2 based on if a context is passed in at
all. This restores the behavior in the initial 0a99fa2fd6 where a
call to `rendar_markdown_path` could be made to just render markdown,
and not some other unmentioned and unrelated templating language as
well.
This adds tests for more corner cases, in exchange for dropping the
query count tests, which were of dubious utility. It also adds the
time-machine library to mock the current time to test that the limits
do expire.
This commit updates 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to not raise an error when deleting a UserTopic row and the user
doesn't have a visibility_policy for the topic yet, or when setting
the visibility_policy to its current value.
Also, it includes the changes to not send unnecessary events
in such cases.
Currently, there is a checkbox setting for whether to
"Include realm name in subject of message notification emails".
This commit replaces the checkbox setting with a dropdown
having values: Automatic [default], Always, Never.
The Automatic option includes the realm name if, and only if,
there are multiple Zulip realms associated with the user's email.
Tests are added and(or) modified.
Fixes: #19905.
Anders Kaseorg
Prakhar Pratyush
Alex Vandiver
Daniil Fadeev
Mateusz Mandera
Lauryn Menard
Sahil Batra
Joelute
Zixuan James Li
Alya Abbott
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas