The inconsistent style between these three buttons looked bad.
We have to take some care with the "Starred messages" and "Edit" ones,
to make sure they live-update properly.
Previously, when the user presses 'Enter' within a input
field while keyboard focus in is in the topic edit textbox
it incorrectly opened the dropdown list widget.
This is because the dropdown button had the default type attribute of
'submit' which triggers the click event binded to it. Fix it by
explicitly defining it's type attribute to be a button.
Fixes#18415
Previously, the focus event tends to skip the first
element within the dropdown list when the user presses
the down arrow.
Added a stopPropogation event for keydown handler within
dropdown_list_widget which propoerly binds the focus
event to the dropdown list items.
We record Git details about the merge-base with upstream branches in
the zulip-git-version file, if the upstream repository is available.
Note that the first Git upgrade after merging the parent commit will
not include the merge-base details, since the upstream repository will
not have been available.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This ensures that the `git describe` queries that we run for caching
Zulip's Git version are guaranteed to include recent releases.
This change ensures that we have accurate output even if we're pointed
at a fork of Zulip that never updates its tags.
Additionally, it will make it possible to record the
`git merge-base upstream/master` in future commits.
Note that because we run this code before unpacking the new version,
the pre-upgrade version of this code runs.
As a result, we cannot assume that the upstream repository exists.
These logs were pretty spammy, and there have long been much better
ways to communicate to system administrators that the incoming email
gateway is great, including, most importantly, in the section of the
emails themselves that explains how replying works.
Previously, the "Move topic" option was only displayed to organization
administrators, despite the new setting making who can move topics
between streams configurable.
Making this migration requires us to remove the text on the previous
"Admin actions" divider, and just make it an hrule, to avoid confusing
normal users, while still providing a hint that moving topics is a
non-personal operation.
We also change the ordering for consistency.
This commit adds the dropdown in 'Stream settings' section of organization
permissions page to control who can move messages between streams and
also hides the stream-edit UI in message-edit form accordingly.
Fixes#14499.
This commit extracts the logic for testing user_can_invite_others_to_realm
user_can_create_streams, and user_can_subscribe_other_users to a single
function test_policy and this function test_policy is called passing
different policies and validation functions as arguments.
This helps in removing a lot of duplicated code.
Previously only admins were allowed to move messages between streams
and admins are allowed to post in any stream irresepctive of stream
post policy, so there was no need to check for stream post policy.
But as we now allow other members to also move messages, we need
to check whether the user who is moving the message is allowed
to post to the target stream (i.e. stream to which the messages
are being moved) and thus we allow moving messages only if the
user is allowed to post in target stream.
b7b1ec0aeb made our checks of the response
format stronger, to enforce that the json translates to a valid dict.
However, old client code (zulip_botserver) was using "" as equivalent to
response_not_required - so we need to keep backward-compatibility to not
break things built on it.
This also handles a few other places missed earlier like
narrow headings, beacuse they use the same function.
We already rerender the PM list for events, so there's no
need to do anything special when someone is muted/unmuted.
`people.get_full_names` is now only used in the settings pages
while creating ListWidgets etc, so we add a new test for
it to ensure coverage.
Currently, moving messages between streams is an action limited to
organization administrators. A big part of the motivation for that
restriction was to prevent users from moving messages from a private
stream without shared history as a way to access messages they should
not have access to.
Organization administrators can already just make the stream have
shared history if they want to access its messages, but allowing
non-administrators to move messages between would have
introduced a security bug without this change.
This completes the effort to make it possible to use
bulk_access_message in contexts where there are more than a handful of
messages without creating performance issues.
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
aryanshridhar
Steve Howell
Alex Vandiver
sahil839
Mateusz Mandera
akshatdalton
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas