Various pieces of our thumbor-based thumbnailing system were already
merged; this adds the remaining pieces required for it to work:
* a THUMBOR_URL Django setting that controls whether thumbor is
enabled on the Zulip server (and if so, where thumbor is hosted).
* Replaces the overly complicated prototype cryptography logic
* Adds a /thumbnail endpoint (supported both on web and mobile) for
accessing thumbnails in messages, designed to support hosting both
external URLs as well as uploaded files (and applying Zulip's
security model for access to thumbnails of uploaded files).
* Modifies bugdown to, when THUMBOR_URL is set, render images with the
`src` attribute pointing /thumbnail (to provide a small thumbnail
for the image), along with adding a "data-original" attribute that
can be used to access the "original/full" size version of the image.
There are a few things that don't work quite yet:
* The S3 backend support is incomplete and doesn't work yet.
* The error pages for unauthorized access are ugly.
* We might want to rename data-original and /thumbnail?size=original
to use some other name, like "full", that better reflects the fact
that we're potentially not serving the original image URL.
This adds support to the event queue system for triggering
missed-message notifications (whether push or email) to support the
stream push notifications feature.
This modifies the logic for formatting outgoing missed-message emails
to support the upcoming stream email notifications feature (providing
a new format for the subject, etc.).
Because we're passing through the trigger for notifications to
do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip, we don't need to go back
to the database to determine which messages actually mentioned the
user.
This change converts our logic for determining whether the current
user was mentioned in a group of messages from the implicit "if it was
sent to a stream, it's a mention" to the explicit "we actually know
there was a mention in the message". This is an important
prerequisite for our upcoming feature to support getting email
notifications for streams always (even without a mention).
Previously, maybe_enqueue_notifications had this very subtle logic,
where it set the notice variable only inside the block for push
notifications, but then also used it inside the block for email
notifications.
This "worked", because previously the conditions for push
notifications were always true if the conditions for email
notifications were, but the code was unnecessarily confusing. The
only good reason to write it this way is if build_offline_notification
was expensive; in fact, the most expensive thing it does is calling
time.time(), so that reason does not apply here.
This was further confusing, in that in the original logic, we relied
on the fact that push notification code path edited the "notice"
dictionary for further processing.
Instead, we just call it separately and setup the data separately in
each code path.
This data will be required for correctly implementing the upcoming
stream_push_notify feature; it also helps support cleaning up the code
for the existing stream mentions logic.
Because in upcoming commits, we'll want to pass additional per-message
data into do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip, we need to
expand the format for how we represent messages to account for that.
This refactors the generate_topic_history_from_db_rows function to not
depend upon the assumption of rows passed as parameter to be sorted in
reverse order of max_message_id field.
Additionally, we add sorting and some tests that verify correct
handling of these cases.
In this commit we add a new endpoint so as to have a way of fetching
topic history for a given stream id without having to be logged in.
This can only happen if the said stream is web public otherwise we
just return an empty topics list. This endpoint is quite analogous
to get_topics_backend which is used by our main web app.
In this commit we also do a bit of duplication regarding the query
responsible for fetching all the topics from DB. Basically this
query is exactly the same as what we have in the
get_topic_history_for_stream function in actions.py. Basically
duplicating now is the right thing to do because this query is
really gonna change when we add another criteria for filtering
messages which is:
Only topics for messages which were sent during the period the
corresponding stream was web public should be returned.
Now when we will do this, the query will change and thus it won't
really be a code duplication!
We already include the issue title in the topic. But if one chooses
to group all gitlab notifications under one topic, the message body
is misleading in the sense that only the Issue ID and the description
are displayed, not the title, which isn't super helpful if the topic
doesn't tell you the title either.
I think we should err on the side of always including the title in
the main message body, which is what this commit does.
Fixes#9913.
This migrates Zulip to use a dramatically better set of names and
aliases for our emoji set, defined in emoji_names.py (which is in turn
manually generated from our hand-curated CSV file).
This should significantly improve the experience of using Zulip's
emoji picker and emoji typeahead for finding what one is looking for.
Fixes#7665
In case of invitation events, 'invites_changed' event without
any real payload is sent to all the realm admins and the user.
The event is handled by reloading the list to view recent changes.
Commit tweaked by shubhamdhama:
* Send an `invite_changed` event when an user accept an invite.
Also, added the test for the same.
* No need to delete the invite list in frontend, current logic
handles the case when the invite data is changed properly.
* Extracted the common logic for sending an event into
`notify_invites_changed`.
Some of the arguments in our REST API have to be sent as JSON objects,
which only accept double quotes for strings.
If we display the examples as normal Python objects, the syntax would be
quite similar but it would use simple quotes, which is invalid JSON (and
isn't accepted by the server).
That's why all the examples should be JSON-serialized in order to comply
with the API's requirements.
Until now, we were displaying an empty "Arguments" section in the REST
API docs whenever an endpoint didn't use input arguments.
In the case of OpenAPI-based docs, that was also annoying because it
required removing the {generate_api_arguments_table|...} template tag or
leaving an empty "parameters" field in zulip.yaml.
After this, we show a paragraph indicating that the endpoint doesn't
need arguments under the "Arguments" section.
If the argument table generator isn't able to reach a file that is
supposed to read, the two most likely causes are:
- The source .md documentation file that is requesting the table has a
typo in the path.
- The file with the arguments isn't there, for some reason.
In either case, we don't want the server to fail silently-ish and
display the docs as if there was no arguments for that endpoint. That's
why the most logic thing to do is to raise an exception and let the
admins know that there's something wrong.
<script charset=…>, <script type=…>, and <style type=…> are “obsolete
but conforming” in HTML5. They make the validator.nu output noisier
and real problems a little harder to find.
(type was required in HTML 4, which is not relevant to us.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
POST and DELETE operations in /users/me/alert_words may leave the
user's list of alert words in an unknown state: POSTing adds words to a
list that the client may not know from the begining, and the same with
DELETE.
Replying with the current status of the alert words list is the best way
of letting the client alter the list and knowing its contents after
being updated with a single query.
This is especially useful taking into account that POSTing words that
were already present and DELETing non-existing words both produce a
successful response.
An extra test has been added to avoid leaving GET /users/me/alert_words
too untested.
Querying an endpoint with no information (thus a noop) and it producing
a successful response doesn't seem to be expected.
Given the case that the client makes such query with no content it will
probably be unintentional and the API should let them know about it.
For importing huddles we have to have unique huddle hashes.
Huddle hashes are extracted from the list of users participating
in a huddle. So to extract these user ids, we first use huddle
id to getting the matching recipient, and then we use subscription
to get the user ids from the recipient id.
Added tests for the same (tests slightly tweaked by tabbott).
The tests for GET /users were looking for a specific user, asuming that
it would always be in the same position. Since the users' sorting isn't
guaranteed in any way, this can lead to errors in the tests.
Now we make sure the user we grab from the list is the one we need by
checking its email address.
This is just a hotfix that addresses the short-term problem: we have
already made some efforts to make sure these tests are more
deterministic, and now we only need to finish the migration of the old
enpoints to the new system as a long-term solution.
This is all the plumbing that makes it possible to enable the
stream_email_notifications setting via the Zulip API. The flag still
doesn't do anything yet, but this is a nice checkpoint along the way
to implementing this feature.
This commit creates a new field called delivery_email. For now, it is
exactly the same as email upon user profile creation and should stay
that way even when email is changed, and is used only for sending
outgoing email from Zulip.
The purpose of this field is to support an upcoming option where the
existing `email` field in Zulip becomes effectively the user's
"display email" address, as part of making it possible for users
actual email addresses (that can receive email, stored in the
delivery_email field) to not be available to other non-administrator
users in the organization.
Because the `email` field is used in numerous places in display code,
in the API, and in database queries, the shortest path to implementing
this "private email" feature is to keep "email" as-is in those parts
of the codebase, and just set the existing "email" ("display email")
model field to be something generated like
"username@zulip.example.com" for display purposes.
Eventually, we'll want to do further refactoring, either in the form
of having both `display_email` and `delivery_email` as fields, or
renaming "email" to "username".
This commit adds a Markdown tree-processor extension that renders
multi-line code blocks that are nested inside lists with the
formatting. Note that the code block could be nested inside multiple
list levels and would still get rendered correctly.
Tim: This fixes the need for unpleasant workarounds like
f5bfa4e793 and makes nested code blocks
in our documentation look exactly how users would expect them to.
Given that we allow adding emoji reactions by only using the
emoji_name, we should offer the same possibility for removing
reactions to make the experience for API clients not require looking
up emoji codes.
Since this is an additional optional parameter, this also preserves
backward compatibility.
Complete, correct implementations of Zulip's emoji reactions API need
to send both emoji_code and emoji_name in order to add a reaction;
this is important for corner cases around clicking on a reaction in a
message that was first reacted to a year ago, when the emoji
name->code mappings have changed for the given code point in the
intervening time.
However, for folks building tools using the Zulip API, that corner
case is not particularly common; as a result, it makes sense to offer
an interface that allows adding a reaction by only specifying the
emoji name.
This is why the only field that needs to be required is emoji_name,
which can now be mapped to a single emoji. Both fields will be
necessary when "voting" an old reaction, but since we stil allow
specifying the two of them, these changes offer retrocompatibility.
This adds a new settings, SOCIAL_AUTH_SUBDOMAIN, which specifies which
domain should be used for GitHub auth and other python-social-auth
backends.
If one is running a single-realm Zulip server like chat.zulip.org, one
doesn't need to use this setting, but for multi-realm servers using
social auth, this fixes an annoying bug where the session cookie that
python-social-auth sets early in the auth process on the root domain
ends up masking the session cookie that would have been used to
determine a user is logged in. The end result was that logging in
with GitHub on one domain on a multi-realm server like zulipchat.com
would appear to log you out from all the others!
We fix this by moving python-social-auth to a separate subdomain.
Fixes: #9847.
* If `zerver_realmauditlog` is present in the exported data,
`RealmAuditLog` would be imported normally.
* If it is not present, `create_subscription_events`
function in would create the `subscription_created`
events for RealmAuditLog. The reason this function
is in `import_realm` module and not in the individual
export tool scripts (like Slack) is because this
function would be common for all export tools.
This fixes#9846 for users who have not already done an import of
their organization from Slack.
Fixes#9846.
Vishnu Ks
amanagr
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Aditya Bansal
Sarah
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Harshit Bansal
Aastha Gupta
Yago González
Rhea Parekh
Joshua Pan