This has always been in the global namespace. Pretending that it’s
scoped when it isn’t and giving it a short name will lead to
confusion.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Flatpickr had been unconditionally using the light theme in automatic
color scheme mode; this fixes it to follow the system preference like
the rest of the app.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Updates the descriptions of content parameters (optional and
required) to note that the maximum size of the message content
should be based on the `max_message_length` value returned by
the register endpoint.
Previously these descriptions had a hardcoded value of 10000
bytes as the maximum message size.
Also, updates the description of `max_message_length` to clarify
that the value represents Unicode code points.
The password parameter being passed in the `_do_test` helper
function for `TestAuthenticatedJsonPostViewDecorator` tests was
being ignored, as the user needs to be logged in. Removes the
parameter from the helper function and updates the success test
to use `assert_json_success` instead of just checking the status
code.
Also adds a test case for when a user is not logged in to confirm
that it returns an UnauthorizedError.
This reverts commit 851d68e0fc.
That commit widened how long the transaction is open, which made it
much more likely that after the user was created in the transaction,
and the memcached caches were flushed, some other request will fill
the `get_realm_user_dicts` cache with data which did not include the
new user (because it had not been committed yet).
If a user creation request lost this race, the user would, upon first
request to `/`, get a blank page and a Javascript error:
Unknown user_id in get_by_user_id: 12345
...where 12345 was their own user-id. This error would persist until
the cache expired (in 7 days) or something else expunged it.
Reverting this does not prevent the race, as the post_save hook's call
to flush_user_profile is still in a transaction (and has been since
168f241ff0), and thus leaves the potential race window open.
However, it much shortens the potential window of opportunity, and is
a reasonable short-term stopgap.
The post-delete signal on AlertWord clears the realm cache; when it is
called repeatedly, this results in re-fetching the realm object O(n)
times, where n scales by number of users in the database.
Disconnect this cache-clearing signal before removing the AlertWord
entries, and reconnect it afterwards. This is not thread-safe, but
this section is single-threaded. It is also probably unnecessary to
re-connect the signal, as rest of `./manage.py populate_db` does not
delete AlertWord objects, but cleanliness dictates doing the
re-connection.
This drops the time to repeatedly run:
python3 ./manage.py populate_db --num-messages=0 --extra-users=1000
...from 47 seconds to 36 seconds.
5db55c38dc switched from `ensure => present` to the more specific
`ensure => directory` on the premise that tarballs would result in
more than one file being copied out of them. However, we only extract
a single file from the wal-g tarball, and install it at the output
path. The new rule attempts to replace it with an empty directory
after extraction.
Switch back to `ensure => present` for the tarball codepath.
The Client.name field is only 30 characters long, but there is no
limit to the length of parsed User-Agent value which we may attempt to
store in it. This can cause requests with long user-agents to 500
when the creation of the Client row fails.
Truncate the name at 30 characters for the cache key, and passing
`name` to `get_or_create`.
The design of this element was changed midway through #22504, and
despite a separate placeholder icon using used, the preview was still
reset to the default avatar -- but is always hidden when so set.
This will allow us to re-use this logic later, when we add support for
re-checking notification settings just before sending email/push
notifications to the user.
Also, since this is essentially part of the notifiability logic,
this better belongs to `notification_data.py` and this change will
hopefully reduce the reading complexity of the message-send codepath.
This commit basically updates the frontend code to directly use
delivery_email field instead of functions like show_email or
email_for_user_settings at places where we want to show email.
We can do this change since we recently updated the server code
to always pass "delivery_email" code in the user objects with its
value being null if the real email is not accessible.
Showing email or "hidden" or nothing at various places in UI like
in users list, subscriber list, user profile popover and modal is
same as before.
Major points -
- Removed show_email and email_for_user_settings functions since we
directly use delivery_email field now as explained above.
- While sorting by emails in the users list, users with real emails
hidden are always shown in last when sorting alphabetically and at
the top when sorting reverse alphabetically. Also, those users with
real emails hidden, are sorted by name among themselves. As we did
before, we do not allow sorting by email when all emails are hidden.
- There is no change in typeahead behavior at this point. We either
hide the email completely or show the real or fake email based on
user level setting.
- Added code to handle delivery_email events and appropriately add/remove
delivery_email field from person objects.
This commits update the code to use user-level email_address_visibility
setting instead of realm-level to set or update the value of UserProfile.email
field and to send the emails to clients.
Major changes are -
- UserProfile.email field is set while creating the user according to
RealmUserDefault.email_address_visbility.
- UserProfile.email field is updated according to change in the setting.
- 'email_address_visibility' is added to person objects in user add event
and in avatar change event.
- client_gravatar can be different for different users when computing
avatar_url for messages and user objects since email available to clients
is dependent on user-level setting.
- For bots, email_address_visibility is set to EVERYONE while creating
them irrespective of realm-default value.
- Test changes are basically setting user-level setting instead of realm
setting and modifying the checks accordingly.
Previously, user objects contained delivery_email field
only when user had access to real email. Also, delivery_email
was not present if visibility setting is set to "everyone"
as email field was itself set to real email.
This commit changes the code to pass "delivery_email" field
always in the user objects with its value being "None" if
user does not have access to real email and real email otherwise.
The "delivery_email" field value is None for logged-out users.
For bots, the "delivery_email" is always set to real email
irrespective of email_address_visibility setting.
Also, since user has access to real email if visibility is set
to "everyone", "delivery_email" field is passed in that case
too.
There is no change in email field and it is same as before.
This commit also adds code to send event to update delivery_email
field when email_address_visibility setting changes to all the
users whose access to emails changes and also changes the code to
send event on changing delivery_email to users who have access
to email.
These being possibly `display: block` in some settings resulted in
them taking up visible space oddly if the asset failed to load.
tabbott could not reproduce the original bug, perhaps because changes
in the emoji CSS do `display: inline-block` on div.emoji, but the
logical intent for this component suggests it should be a span in any
case.
Fixes#23516.
The previous logic incorrectly tried to map elements of the list of
user IDs beyond 4 senders to their `.id` fields, which were undefined;
the correct thing to do is just use the list of user IDs that we
already have.
Due to `max-width: min-content` being used and `min-width: max-content`
not being applied since it is not present outside of development
environment, the text wrapped after every word.
The intention of this CSS was to restrict the max-width of the
`white-box` and I think 800px is a good max-width after which
content should wrap.