Updates text of generate-webhook-url-basic.md to replace the use of
the "Create the channel" step.
Removes {!create-channel.md!} from all the integrations docs that
also include {!generate-webhook-url-basic.md!}.
Fixes#32269.
This is preparatory work towards adding a Topic model.
We plan to use the local variable name as 'topic' for
the Topic model objects.
Currently, we use *topic as the local variable name for
topic names.
We rename local variables of the form *topic to *topic_name
so that we don't need to think about type collisions in
individual code paths where we might want to talk about both
Topic objects and strings for the topic name.
This kind of payload that's loaded from json in the body of the request
is not only used for webhooks, but also in the push bouncer, and may get
used elsewhere too - so a general name is better.
Instead of a WildValue, the JSON/Sentry webhook expect the request body to be a
dict.
For the JSON webhook, json.dumps accepts other types of input as well and the
constraint is not necessary, but this serve as a good example of an alternative
use of WebhookPayload to describe a payload that is intended to be parsed from
the entire request body from JSON, into a type other than WildValue.
Previously, if a user tried to create a webhook using the Webhooks
plugin in Sentry and used the "Test plugin" to test the webhook,
the server would send a 500 error, even though the integration
worked perfectly. This led users to believe that the integration
was not working.
Fixes#26173.
markdown-include is GPL licensed.
Also, rewrite it as a block processor, so that it works correctly
inside indented blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
The reason for this bug is because of different striping
processes in the backend and frontend, i.e The frontend
checks if the message's `raw_content` has changed to
decide if the `content` of the message should be sent in
the request to the backend, or not. So, it removes the
leading new line ('\n') from the message `raw_content`
when checking it, which is causing the "Error saving edit:
You don't have permission to edit this message" error.
This commit fixes it by removing the leading new line
when cleaning message content.
The bug was explained by @punchagan and its solution
by @timabbott.
Since FIXTURE_DIR_NAME is the name of the folder that contains the view
and tests modules of the webhook and another folder called "fixtures" that
store the fixtures, it is more appropriate to call it WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME,
especially when we want to refer to the view module using this variable.
Sentry allows adding simple webhooks without going through the process
of creating an Internal Integration in Sentry's Integration
Platform[1] (which our docs recommend).
The payload from sent from such a (simple) webhook integration is
slightly different from the payload sent by an Internal Integration
webhook. This commit tries to wrangle this payload into a form that is
usable by our webhook handler to send a notification message.
[1]: https://sentry.io/integration-platform/
Any exception is an "unexpected event", which means talking about
having an "unexpected event logger" or "unexpected event exception" is
confusing. As the error message in `exceptions.py` already explains,
this is about an _unsupported_ event type.
This also switches the path that these exceptions are written to,
accordingly.
8e10ab282a moved UnexpectedWebhookEventType into
`zerver.lib.exceptions`, but left the import into
`zserver.lib.webhooks.common` so that webhooks could continue to
import the exception from there.
This clutters things and adds complexity; there is no compelling
reason that the exception's source of truth should not move alongside
all other exceptions.
Sentry may get reported multiple exceptions stacks, in the case where
a `raise ...` was caught, and a new exception was `raise`d. In this
case, the `filename` is the most recent exception -- but the
exceptions are stored in the `exception` key in the order in which
they occurred. As such, taking the first value with a `stacktrace`
will result in showing the wrong line, or in no stack trace being
resolved at all.
Look from the last `exception` backwards, for matching stacks.
oscar
Lauryn Menard
adnan-td
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
Prakhar Pratyush
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Zixuan James Li
Satyam Bansal
abdullahm1
Matt Keller
Lauryn Menard
Riken Shah
PIG208
Puneeth Chaganti