We still need to write to these globals with set_global because the
code being tested reads from them, but the tests themselves should
never need to read from them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit makes it so that MessageListData
methods always attempt to filter muted messages.
We later, in a new function
(`messages_filtered_for_topic_mutes`)
check if `excludes_muted_topics` is true or not,
and skip the filtering work if it isn't.
This new function consistently returns a new list.
This refactor will later allow us to write clean
and concise code as part of mute users.
This commit also refactors the muting tests
for MessageListData, which were earlier
spread across two `run_test` functions.
These tests should remain organized,
since similar tests will be added as part of
user mutes in future commits.
Previously, the `muting_enabled` property of
MessageListData class was used to indicate whether
some messages in the message list need to be
filtered due to topic muting, depending on the
narrow. For example, we exclude messages belonging
to muted topics from stream narrows, but not from
search narrows.
The name `muting_enabled` is a bit confusing, and hence is
changed to `excludes_muted_topics`.
It is also important that the name be specific, since
a similar new property will be added for user mutes
in future commits.
user_profile.id was confused for user_profile.recipient_id. These bugs
are particularly sneaky as they can go undetected by tests due to ids of
objects accidentally coinciding. We add a mitigation for this class of
mistakes by shifting the Recipient.id sequence in test db.
This was introduced in dda3ff41e1.
On the rare occasion where user_profile.id would coincide with
recipient_id passed to the function, we would return the wrong value.
That is, instead of correctly returning recipient_id, we would return
sender.recipient_id - recipient id of the sender of the message, thus
possibly returning user_profile.recipient_id (if user_profile is the
sender) - exactly the situation the function wanted to avoid
with the `if recipient_id == my_recipient_id:` if. Ultimately resulting
in incorrect/malformed data in
state['raw_recent_private_conversations'].
nlargest is the natural fit for selecting n biggest items
from an unsorted list. It's more readable as well as more
efficent (even though we don't care much about the efficeny
in this particular case).
The current logic doesn't display data types when the additionalProperties
variables are not object, but are array of strings, etc. Changed the if
condition to allow rendering in such cases.
I have a local branch with a hacked up version of
zjquery that lets you basically detect when zjquery
stubs are never actually invoked by real code.
There are some nuances to that kind of audit, so
I haven't pushed the auditing code, but these
are low hanging fruit.
I now just use inline the code to create stubs
for the line items in the markdown_content
container, and I don't add methods to the
zjquery stubs.
And then I use the new "children" feature in
zjquery's `$.create(sel, opts)` to set up
$(".markdown_content"), which means I don't
have to stub `each` any more.
It's actually pretty rare in our codebase to
call methods like `$(...).map` or `$(...).each`,
but we now support them better in zjquery.
You can pass a list of child elements now to
`$.create(...)`.
Fixes the sorting button labels in stream settings, which were
regressed by commit f8fbae4d8e (because
the HTML was not marked as being HTML).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
zerver/lib/users.py has a function named access_user_by_id, which is
used in /users views to fetch a user by it's id. Along with fetching
the user this function also does important validations regarding
checking of required permissions for fetching the target user.
In an attempt to solve the above problem this commit introduces
following changes:
1. Make all the parameters except user_profile, target_user_id
to be keyword only.
2. Use for_admin parameter instead of read_only.
3. Adds a documentary note to the function describing the reason for
changes along with recommended way to call this function in future.
4. Changes in views and tests to call this function in this changed
format.
Changes were tested using ./tools/test-backend.
Fixes#17111.