A user can subscribe to a stream and sometimes (depending
on stream permissions) see messages from the stream
that were sent before they subscribed, and that user
won't have a UserMessage row for that message.
In order to do things like star a message, we need
to create UserMessage records on the fly.
In the past we wisely constrained this logic to the
specific use cases. But I think we can generalize
the logic now. For example, we are now building a
feature to mark messages as unread, and it motivates
the same need to auto-create UserMessage rows.
So now we handle this in a more generalized fashion.
Refactors and cleans up the shared `MessagesBase` schema in
the OpenAPI so that it accurately reflects the general base
for message objects for endpoints that use it as a reference.
A follow-up to adding `edit_history` as a property of message
objects. And a prepartory commit for `GET /messages/{msg_id}`
to return not only the raw content of the message but also
the message object.
We loop through edit history entries and see if any of them
are more interesting than a (un)resolve topic edit, extending
the existing loop we had.
We also update the associated node tests.
Fixes#19919.
Co-authored by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
Updates the simulated edit history entries that are saved when
`update_messages` events are received for the modern data
structure on the server for `message.edit_history` entries.
Also cleans up a misnamed field in said entries, `edited_by`.
When removing notifications, we skip the access control on if the user
still can read them -- they should not have a notification of them,
both because they currently cannot read the message, as well as
because they have already done so.
Uses the `rendering_only` field in the `update_message` event
to filter the addition of `last_edit_timestamp` to the message,
which is what triggers the addition of an `Edited` notification
when a message is rerendered in the web app.
Also, removes the deletion of `msg.last_edit_timestr` since this is
regenerated every time the message is rendered, and so it did nothing
beyond confusing the code.
We already show the error if topic input is empty and it is
not allowed to send messages without topic in the organization,
and this commit also shows error when topic is "(no topic)".
The topic is set to "(no topic)" when someone sends a message
with empty topic input box and when it is allowed to send message
without topics in the organization.
This is not ideal behavior as we may want to treat "(no topic)"
differently from empty topic, but we can fix this in future and
this commit can be a short term fix.
Fixes#21344.
Translators found it confusing, since it's not at all obvious that the
word "quote" should not be translated.
I'm not altogether happy with the code formatting for this.
While we're changing this, also standardize on the "```` quote" style
of quote blocks to ensure code/quote blocks in stream descriptions are
unlikely to conflict with this syntax.
In some instances (e.g. during upgrades) we run `restart-server` and
not `start-server`, even though we expect the server to most likely
already be stopped. `supervisorctl restart servicename` if the
service is stopped produces the perhaps-alarming message:
```
restart-server: Restarting servicename
servicename: ERROR (not running)
servicename: started
```
This may cause operators to worry that something is broken, when it is
not.
Check if the service is already running, and switch from "restart" to
"start" in cases where it is not.
The race condition here is safe -- if the service transitions from
stopped to started between the check and the `start` call, it will
merely output:
```
servicename: ERROR (already started)
```
...and continue, as that has exit status 0.
If the service transitions from started to stopped between the check
and the `restart` call, we are merely back in the current case, where
it outputs:
```
servicename: ERROR (not running)
servicename: started
```
In none of these cases does a call to "restart" fail to result in the
service being stopped and then started.
In steady-state, requests to FCM take about a second; however, in
cases where the remote FCM server is unstable, the request has been
observed to block for more than a minute.
As noted in the previous commit, pushes must complete within 30s;
fail fast, and let the retries and exponential backoff handle errors.
The worst-case total time taken with timeouts and errors for an FCM
notification is 19.5s. Unfortunately, `aioapns` does not appear to
have any timeouts, and thus this commit cannot guarantee a total of
fewer than 30s.
This reverts bc15085098 (which provided
not justification for its change) and moves further, down to 2 retries
from the default of 5.
10 retries, with exponential backoff, is equivalent to sleeping 2^11
seconds, or just about 34 minutes (though the code uses a jitter which
may make this up to 51 minutes). This is an unreasonable amount of
time to spend in this codepath -- as only one worker is used, and it
is single-threaded, this could effectively block all missed message
notifications for half an hour or longer.
This is also necessary because messages sent through the push bouncer
are sent synchronously; the sending server uses a 30-second timeout,
set in PushBouncerSession. Having retries which linger longer than
this can cause duplicate messages; the sending server will time out
and re-queue the message in RabbitMQ, while the push bouncer's request
will continue, and may succeed.
Limit to 2 retries (APNS currently uses 3), and results expected max
of 4 seconds of sleep, potentially up to 6. If this fails, there
exists another retry loop above it, at the RabbitMQ layer (either
locally, or via the remote server's queue), which will result in up to
3 additional retries -- all told, the request will me made to FCM up
to 12 times.
This model is by designed intended to exist on a 1:1 relationship with
Realms, and we attempt to ensure that with application code, but we
should have a unique constraint too, since a database with duplicate
such entries would be corrupted.
We do this via the standard Django OneToOneField.
We have two different frontend implementations of computing the
un-resolved form of a topic name, and they have a subtle -- but
intentional -- difference in behavior.
Factor them both out into the resolve_topic module, along with
their inverse, and with comments and tests.
These two conditionals are each relying on the other to trigger
on the same condition, and to do complementary things. Move them
together to a single place so that that relationship is easy to see,
and to refactor.
The most notable change here is that when you are adding
subscribers to a stream as part of creating the stream,
you can now use the same essential pill-based UI for
adding users as we do when you edit subscribers for an
existing stream.
We don't try to exactly mimic the edit-stream UI or
implementation, since when you are adding subscribers
during create-stream, we are just updating a list in
memory, whereas in the edit-stream UI, we immediately
send info to the server.
Fixes#20499
It was there to work around https://bugs.python.org/issue17519. This
workaround with del seems like a partial improvement.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We want TypedDicts that have actual teeth.
In order to make type checks meaningful, we want
to avoid Any, object, or crazy Union types when
we aggregate each type of message, so we replaced
a generic function with three concrete functions.
The effective date on the DPA should have been February 7, because we
didn't actually update the zulip.com website until that day.
(This commit was added to the internal zulip.com branch during
deployment of the last DPA update, so users always saw the correct
information).
Provide stream privacy and description in stream notification events
when stream is created.
In function "send_messages_for_new_subscribers" for when stream is
created, put policy name and description of the stream.
Fixes#21004
Ubuntu 22.04 pushed a post-feature-freeze update to Python 3.10,
breaking virtual environments in a Debian patch
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.10/+bug/1962791).
Also, our antique version of Tornado doesn’t work in 3.10, and we’ll
need to do some work to upgrade that.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This unfortunately requires somewhat ugly duplicated code, but I think
it's the best option for now.
I expect we will somewhat soon work on the transition to no longer
have two duplicate fetches here, and doing so will let us remove this
secondary code path.
Fixes#21304.
I made the header sections above all our settings
panel lists more consistent.
Before this change:
* some lists had titles, others didn't
* the placement of the filter box was random
* alerts strangely went between the filter box
and the list
* filter boxes were too large
* CSS was haphazard
* forms were squished against tables
Now all the settings with list have consistent
HTML, CSS, and look-and-feel in the area directly above
their list of items.
With the exception of Custom Profile Fields, all the
lists with headers above them happen to be based on
ListWidget, but the header styling is not coupled
to ListWidget, because we want consistent headers
even if Custom Profile Fields has a non-ListWidget
list (due to its drag&drop features).
Previously, this had different hover behavior from the adjacent
elements, which seems like a bug.
The CSS for this component is shared with Recent Topics; we migrate
the styling for on_hover_topic_read for consistency.
Fixes#21273.
Because Zulip Mobile supports some older iOS browser versions that
don't have replaceAll support yet, and mobile is averse to doing the
infrastructure work required to add a, polyfill we avoid using them in
the shared module for now.
See https://caniuse.com/mdn-javascript_builtins_string_replaceall
Steve Howell
Lauryn Menard
Tim Abbott
Alya Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Lauryn Menard
Sahil Batra
prashantpaidi
Anders Kaseorg
Greg Price
byshen-dev
Mateusz Mandera
Dinesh
NerdyLucifer
Junchen Liu
Greg Price
Austin Riba