We send a remove mobile push notification to the users who were
no longer mentioned after the content of the message was edited.
This also corrects the notification count for the mobile apps
where a user was prior mentioned in a muted stream / topic and the
message was edited and the user is no longer mentioned now.
Hence, fixing the case where user has read all his unreads
but the notification badge on the app is still positive.
Fixes#15428.
do_clear_mobile_push_notifications_for_ids can now be used to
clear push_notification for multiple users at once. This method
loops over users, so no performance optimization is gained.
We've been seeing an exception in server_event_dispatch.js in
production where in large organizations, sometimes when a new user
joined, every other browser in the organization would throw an
exception processing some sort of realm_user/update event.
It turns out the cause was that when a user copies their profile from
an existing user account with a user-uploaded avatar, the code path we
reused to set the avatar properly send a realm_user/update event about
the avatar change -- for a user that hadn't been fully created and
certainly hadn't have the realm_user/add event sent for.
We fix this and add tests and comments to prevent it recurring.
(Removed an incorrect docstring while working on this).
The restart event was always handled pretty similarly
to pointer, so I use restart events now for this
test (in preparation of eliminating pointer events).
This eval function performs the inverse of the implicit
stringification that’s implied by this type-incorrect assignment in
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed:
field_value.value = field['value']
We believe there’s sufficient validation for the data being passed to
this eval that it could only have been exploited by a PostgreSQL
administrator editing the database manually.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Tim thought commit 51acca2672 was needed
because he had an extra social_django directory in his checkout.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This fixes an issues that causes HTML entities inside of inline code
blocks to be converted rather than being displayed literally.
The upstream python-markdown now handles this correctly, so we just use
their implementation with our changes for removing .strip(). As a result
of this migration, we switch backtick pattern to an inline processor
too.
Fixes#12056.
For the codeblock counterpart of this issue, we should follow the
upstream PR https://github.com/Python-Markdown/markdown/pull/990.
Co-authored-by: Rohitt Vashishtha <aero31aero@gmail.com>
* Reordered the settings relevant without stream creation to the top.
* Removed useless/misleading defaults for optional parameters.
* Clarified description of the announce and authorization_errors_fatal settings.
* Clarified that `invite_only` only applies for stream creation.
(It's annoying to do so for its friends because they are including
common description content and OpenAPI doesn't have a way to have
extra content in a place you included something)
Fixes#14705.
Now we are consistent about validating color/description.
Ideally we wouldn't need to validate the
`streams_raw` parameters multiple times per
request, but the outer function here changes
the error messages to explicitly reference
the "delete" and "add" request variables.
And for the situation where the user-supplied
parameters are correct, the performance penalty
for checking them twice is extremely negligible.
So it's probably fine for now to just make sure
we use the same validators in all the relevant
places.
There's probably some deeper refactor that we
can do to eliminate the whole `compose_views`
scheme. And it's also not entirely clear to
me that we really need to support the update
endpoint. But that's all out of the scope of
this commit.
Note that I don't actually convert the
checker from check_dict to check_dict_only,
because that would be a user-facing change,
but I think we can sweep a lot of things
like this after the next release.
This avoids some code duplication as well
as adding some missing fields.
We also use check_dict_only to prevent
folks from adding new fields to the
relevant events without updating these
tests. (A bigger sweep comes later.)
As the code comment indicates, we just
use a strict check here rather than
pretending that the test exercises a
more complicated schema for the config
data, which is dynamic in nature.
Cleaning up config_data is outside the
scope of this PR; my main goal is to
eliminate check_dict calls (usually in favor
of check_dict_only).
Because of other validation on these values, I don't believe any of
these does anything different, but these changes improve readability
and likely make GitHub's code scanners happy.
The helper should be used instead of constructing the dict manually.
Change get_account_data_dict, on GitHubAuthBackendTest
class, so it has a third argument, user_avatar_url.
This is a preparation for support using GitHub avatar
upon user resgistration (when the user logs using
GitHub).
If your browser width was between 701px and 750px you got the mobile
view without the mobile header preventing you from changing sections in
the settings menu.
This was caused by a media-query mismatch:
subscriptions.scss used @media (max-width: 750px)
settings.scss however used @media (max-width: 700px)
Comments added by tabbott to help avoid future bugs like this.
* Don't annoyingly open the first section when switching
between the Settings and Organization tabs.
* Don't highlight currently active section in the settings list
(we don't display the currently active section in the mobile settings
list so it isn't actually active).
* Remove nearly invisible and buggy no-border logic.
Update the REQ check for profile_data in
update_user_backend by tweaking `check_profile_data`
to use `check_dict_only`.
Here is the relevant URL:
path('users/<int:user_id>', rest_dispatch,
{'GET': 'zerver.views.users.get_members_backend',
It would be nice to unify the validator
for these two views, but they are different:
update_user_backend
update_user_custom_profile_data
It's not completely clear to me why update_user_backend
seems to support a superset of the functionality
of `update_user_custom_profile_data`, but it has
this code to allow you to remove custom profile fields:
clean_profile_data = []
for entry in profile_data:
assert isinstance(entry["id"], int)
if entry["value"] is None or not entry["value"]:
field_id = entry["id"]
check_remove_custom_profile_field_value(target, field_id)
else:
clean_profile_data.append({
"id": entry["id"],
"value": entry["value"],
})
Whereas the other view is much simpler:
def update_user_custom_profile_data(
<snip>
) -> HttpResponse:
validate_user_custom_profile_data(user_profile.realm.id, data)
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed(user_profile, data)
# We need to call this explicitly otherwise constraints are not check
return json_success()
This tightens our checking of user-supplied data
for this endpoint:
path('users/me/profile_data', rest_dispatch,
{'PATCH': 'zerver.views.custom_profile_fields.update_user_custom_profile_data',
...
We now explicitly require the `value` field
to be present in the dicts being passed in
here, as part of `REQ`. There is no reason
that our current clients would be sending
extra fields here, and we would just ignore
them anyway, so we also move to using
check_dict_only.
Here is some relevant webapp code (see settings_account.js):
fields.push({id: field.id, value: user_ids});
update_user_custom_profile_fields(fields, channel.patch);
settings_ui.do_settings_change(method, "/json/users/me/profile_data",
{data: JSON.stringify([field])}, spinner_element);
The webapp code sends fields one at a time
as one-element arrays, which is strange, but
that is out of the scope of this change.
The flake was caused due to the fact that current_msg_list was not
populated with any messages in rare cases. We were missing a check
to guard against current message list having no messages. The
failure screenshot show no messages to prove this.
Relevant error:
Evaluation failed: TypeError: Cannot read property 'raw_content' of undefined
After some discussion, everyone seems to agree that 3.0 is the more
appropriate version number for our next major release. This updates
our documentation to reflect that we'll be using 3.0 as our next major
release.
Ubuntu 20.04 "focal" comes up to runlevel 5 several seconds before it
is able to successfully resolve hosts, causing `prepare-base` to fail
while fetching from the apt repositories.
Add an additional check to verify that outbound networking is running
before returning from `lxc-wait`.
`/api/v1/fetch_api_key`'s response had a key `email` with the user's
delivery email. But its JSON counterpart `/json/fetch_api_key`, which
has a completely different implementation, did not return `email` in
its success response.
So to avoid confusion, the non-API endpoint, `/json/fetch_api_key`
response has been made identical with it's `/api` counterpart by
adding the `email` key. Also it is safe to send as the calling user
will only see their own email.
We now have our muted topics use tuples internally,
which allows us to tighten up the annotation
for get_topic_mutes, as well as our schema
checking.
We want to deprecate sub_validator=None
for check_list, so we also introduce
check_tuple here. Now we also want to deprecate
check_tuple, but it's at least isolated now.
We will use this for data structures that are tuples,
but which are sent as lists over the wire. Fortunately,
we don't have too many of those.
The plan is to convert tuples to dictionaries,
but backward compatibility may be tricky in some
places.
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Chris Heald
Mateusz Mandera
Clara Dantas
Gittenburg
Priyank Patel
Eeshan Garg
Alex Vandiver
orientor